Analysis of Tangential Position Error or Removal Function Error in Ultrasonic-Magnetorheological Combined Finishing

Abstract:

Ultrasonic-magnetorheological combined finishing (UMCF) is a new technique for the ultra precision machining of aspheric surfaces, especially for high quality work pieces with small curvature radius concave surfaces. The goal with UMCF is to minimize surface figure errors by optimizing the dwell time and tool path, and the current approach typically results in low amplitude form errors. However, discrepancies exist between the predicted and observed form errors. The major sources of such errors are machine axes positioning errors and unpredicted variations of the removal function. Errors that can produce discrepancies between actual and predicted removal profiles were modelled. A diagnostic method was developed to determine the residual error induced by two types of error. Their effects were examined with numerical simulations and the simulation result was presented. Finally, UMCF experiments are performed on a variety of optical surfaces. The final residual error after polishing is less than 2.6 nm PV values. The successful figuring results prove the validity and advantages of UMCF.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 516)
• Pages: 390-395
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.516.390
• Online since: June 2012
• Authors: Fei Hu Zhang, Xing Bin Yu, Yong Zhang
• Keywords: Positioning Error, Removal Function Error, Residual Error, Ultrasonic-Magnetorheological Combined Finishing

References

[1] H.M. Pollicove, E.M. Fess, J.M. Schoen, Deterministic manufacturing processes for precision optical surfaces, Proc. of the SPIE, 5078(2003) 90-96.

DOI: 10.1117/12.487105

[2] H.J. Wang, F.H. Zhang, H. Zhao, D.R. Luan, Y.C. Chen, Study on optical polishing of optical glass by means of ultrasonic-magnetorheological compound finishing, Proc. of the SPIE. 6722 (2007) 67221P1-6722195.

DOI: 10.1117/12.783019

[3] S. Jha, V.K. Jain, Design and development of the magnetorheological abrasive flow finishing (MRAFF) process, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 44 (2004) 1019-1029.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.03.007

[4] D. Golini, K. William, P. Dumas, S. Hogan, Magnetorheological finishing in commercial precision optics manufacturing, Proc. of the SPIE 3782(1999) 80-91.

DOI: 10.1117/12.369174

[5] C.H. Lim, Y.J. Kim, S.H. Lee, W.B. Kim, S.J. Lee, Proc. of the 5th Korean MEMS Conference (2003), p.127.

[6] F. Shi, Y.F. Dai, X.Q. Peng, C. Song, J. Natl. Univ. Def. Technol. 31(2009), p.103.

[7] F.H. Zhang, X.B. Yu, Y. Zhang, Y.Y. Lin, D.R. Luan, Experimental Study on Polishing Characteristics of Ultrasonic- Magnetorheological Compound Finishing, Adv. Mat. Res. 76-78 (2009) 235-239.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.76-78.235