Some Recent Developments in Structural Health Monitoring

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper is concerned with reporting some recent developments in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) research conducted within the Dynamics Research Group at the University of Sheffield. The particular developments discussed are concerned with arguably the two main problems facing data-based approaches to SHM, namely: how to obtain data from damage states of a structure for supervised learning and how to remove environmental and operational effects from data when unsupervised learning (novelty detection) is indicated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

298-318

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C.R. Farrar, K. Worden, An introduction to structural health monitoring, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A 365 (2007) 303-315.

Google Scholar

[2] K. Worden, C.R. Farrar, G. Manson, G. Park, The fundamental axioms of structural health monitoring, Proceedings of the Royal Society, Part A 463 (2007) 1639-1664.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2007.1834

Google Scholar

[3] H. Sohn, Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Part A, 365 (2007) 539-559.

Google Scholar

[4] H. M. Kim, T. J. Bartkowicz, An experimental study for damage detection using a hexagonal truss, Computers and Structures, 79 (2001) 173-182.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(00)00126-7

Google Scholar

[5] L. Y. Cheung, K. Worden, J. A. Rongong, Damage detection in an aircraft component model, Proceedings of the 19th International Modal Analysis Conference, IMAC XIX, Kissimmee, Florida, (2001) 1234-1241.

Google Scholar

[6] E. Papatheou, G. Manson, R.J. Barthorpe, K. Worden, The use of pseudo-faults for novelty detection in SHM, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 329 (2010) 2349-2366.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.07.020

Google Scholar

[7] M. Weiland, M. Link, Matfem 99 User's Guide, Version 26-May-2000, University of Kassel, (2000).

Google Scholar

[8] R. Blevins, Formulas for natural frequency and mode shape, Krieger Publishing Company, (1984).

Google Scholar

[9] K. Worden, G. Manson, N. R. J. Fieller, Damage detection using outlier analysis, Journal of Sound and Vibration 229 (2000) 647-667.

DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1999.2514

Google Scholar

[10] V. Barnett, T. Lewis, Outliers in Statistical Data, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, (1994).

Google Scholar

[11] K. Worden, A.J. Lane, Damage identification using support vector machines, Smart Materials and Structures, 10 (2001) 540-547.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/10/3/317

Google Scholar

[12] N. Christianini, J. Shawe-Taylor, An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel-based Learning Methods, Cambridge University Press, (2000).

DOI: 10.1017/s0263574700232827

Google Scholar

[13] J. Robinson, Support vector machine learning, Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG (2008).

Google Scholar

[14] B. Schölkopf, A.J. Smola, Learning with kernels, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press Ltd. (2002).

Google Scholar

[15] C.W. Hsu, C.J. Lin, A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 13 (2002) 415-25.

DOI: 10.1109/72.991427

Google Scholar

[16] S.R. Gunn, Matlab Support Vector Machine Toolbox, 2. 1 ed, School of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton (2001).

Google Scholar

[17] C.M. Bishop, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, Oxford University Press, (1995).

Google Scholar

[18] T. Anderson, The statistical analysis of time series, Wiley, New York, (1971).

Google Scholar

[19] R. Perman, Cointegration: an introduction to the literature, Journal of Economic Studies, 18 (1993).

Google Scholar

[20] E.J. Cross, K. Worden, Q. Chen, Cointegration; a novel approach for the removal of environmental trends in structural health monitoring data, Proceedings of the Royal Society – Series A, 467 (2011) 2712-2732.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.2011.0023

Google Scholar

[21] D. Dickey, W. Fuller, Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root, Journal of the American statistical association, (1979) 427–431.

DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531

Google Scholar

[22] D. Dickey, W. Fuller, Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with a unit root, Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49 (1981) 1057–1072.

DOI: 10.2307/1912517

Google Scholar

[23] W.A. Fuller, Introduction to statistical time series, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, Wiley Interscience, second edition, (1996).

Google Scholar

[24] S. Johansen, Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models, Oxford University Press, (1995).

DOI: 10.1093/0198774508.003.0002

Google Scholar

[25] G. Manson, Identifying damage sensitive, environment insensitive features for damage detection, Proceedings of the IES conference, Swansea, UK, (2002).

Google Scholar

[26] D. Montgomery, Introduction to statistical quality control, John Wiley and Sons, (2009).

Google Scholar

[27] E.J. Cross, K. Worden, G. Manson, S.G. Pierce, Cointegration for the removal of environmental trends in SHM feature data, an application to Lamb wave-based SHM, Submitted to Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series A, (2011).

Google Scholar