Applications of Self-Organizing Maps in Structural Health Monitoring

Article Preview

Abstract:

The Structural Health Monitoring process includes several steps like feature extraction and probabilistic decision making, which need some form of data fusion and information condensation. These take place after data acquisition and before being able to decide, if a monitored structure has faced damage. Although feature selection is an important step, the processing and suitable preparation of these data are significant, influencing the potential of decision making in various ways. With Self-Organizing Maps (SOM) a multi-purpose instrument for these tasks of pattern recognition and data interpretation is presented here. Self-Organizing Maps belong to the group of artificial neural networks and by using the special map character provide the opportunity of additional visualization. Especially when monitoring a structure over a long period of time, environmental changes often occur, which can mask the effects of damage on the dynamic behavior of the structures. As one potential application of SOM, the possibility of distinguishing between environmental changes and damage of the structure is shown. In this application a self-organizing network is trained with data of the undamaged structure and via calculation of the distance to the map a damage indicator is developed. Moreover, the distinction between different damage modes of piezoelectric sensors is presented using SOM as a tool of pattern recognition and visualization. This application uses data recorded from different damage modes extracted from one specimen of a piezoelectric element. The trained network can be compared with other piezoelectric elements mounted in a similar way to be able to detect possible sensor damage. This helps avoiding false alarms even under changing environmental conditions. Both applications have been successfully used to analyze experimental data on coupon level showing the applicability of the presented concepts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

37-46

Citation:

Online since:

July 2012

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Kohonen, Self-Organizing Maps, Springer, (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] T. Kohonen, Data Management by Self-Organizing Maps, Proc. of WCCI 2008 Plenary/Invited Lectures, LNCS 5050(2008) 309–332, Springer.

Google Scholar

[3] L. E. Mujica, J. Vehí, J. Rodellar, Non-destructive Testing for Assessing Structures by Using Soft-Computing, Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Artificial Neural Networks, vol. 4131 (2006) 982 – 991.

DOI: 10.1007/11840930_102

Google Scholar

[4] L. E. Mujica, J. Vehí, W. Staszewski, K. Worden, Multivariate Statistics Process Control for Dimensionality Reduction on Structural Health Monitoring, Proc. of 3rd EWSHM (2006), 601-608, Spain.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.05.001

Google Scholar

[5] E. Figueiredo, G. Park, C. R. Farrar, K. Worden, J. Figueiras, Machine learning algorithms for damage detection under operational and environmental variability, Journal of Structural Health Monitoring, (2011), 559-572.

DOI: 10.1177/1475921710388971

Google Scholar

[6] P. Kraemer, C. -P. Fritzen, Sensor Fault Detection and Signal Reconstruction using Mutual Information and Kalman Filters, Proc. of International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, Leuven, Belgium (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] G. Park, C.R. Farrar, F. Lanza di Scalea, S. Coccia, Performance assessment and validation of piezoelectric active-sensors in structural health monitoring, Smart Materials and Structures (2006) 1673–1683.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/15/6/020

Google Scholar

[8] B. Eckstein, C. -P. Fritzen, M. Bach, Advancements in Self-Diagnosis of Bonded Piezoelectric Transducers, Proc. 4th European Workshop SHM, (2008) 430-437, Cracow, Poland.

Google Scholar

[9] S. J. Lee, H. Sohn, J. -W. Hong, Time Reversal Based Piezoelectric Transducer Self-diagnosis under Varying Temperature, Journal Nondestructive Evaluation, (2010) 75-91; Springer.

DOI: 10.1007/s10921-010-0067-3

Google Scholar

[10] V. Lämsa, J. Kullaa, Nonlinear Factor Analysis in Structural Health Monitoring to Remove Environmental Effects, Proc. 6nd Intl. Workshop on SHM, Stanford: (2007) 1092-1099.

Google Scholar

[11] A. -M. Yan, G. Kerschen, P. De Boe, J. -C. Golinval, Structural damage diagnosis under varying environmental conditions - part 2: local PCA for non-linear cases, Mechanical Systems and Processing, 19(2005) 865-880.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2004.12.003

Google Scholar

[12] H. Sohn, Effects of environmental and operational variability on structural health monitoring, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, (2007) 365: 539-560.

DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1935

Google Scholar

[13] Information on Laboratory of Computer and Information Science, http: /www. cis. hut. fi/somtoolbox/, Helsinki, University of Technology. (2010).

Google Scholar

[14] A. C. Rencher, Methods of Multivariate Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, (2002).

Google Scholar

[15] P. Kraemer, I. Buethe, C. -P. Fritzen, Damage detection under changing operational and environmental conditions using Self Organizing Maps, Proc. of SMART'11 (2011), Saarbrücken, Germany.

Google Scholar