Multi-Response Parameters Optimisation for Energy-Efficient Injection Moulding Process via Dynamic Shainin DOE Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Process parameters optimisation has been identified as a potential approach to realise a greener injection moulding process. However, reduction in the process energy consumption does not necessarily imply a good part quality. An effective multi-response optimisation process can be demanding and often relies on extensive operational experience from human operators. Therefore, this research focuses on an attempt to develop a more user-friendly approach which could simultaneously deal with the requirements of energy efficiency and part quality. This research proposes a novel approach using a dynamic Shainin Design of Experiment (DOE) methodology to determine an optimal combination of process parameters used in the injection moulding process. The Shainin DOE method is adopted to pinpoint the most important factors on energy consumption and the targeted part quality whereas the ‘dynamic’ term refers to the signal-response system. The effectiveness of the proposed approach was illustrated by investigating the influence of various dominant parameters on the specific energy consumption (SEC) and the Charpy impact strength (CIS) of polypropylene (PP) material after being injection-moulded into impact test specimens. From the experimental results, barrel temperature was identified as the signal factor while mould temperature and cooling time were used as control factors in the full factorial experiments. Then, response function modelling (RFM) was built to characterise the signal-response relationship as a function of the control factors. Finally, RFM led to a trade-off solution where reducing part-to-part variation for CIS resulted in an increase of SEC. Therefore, the research outcomes have demonstrated that the proposed methodology can be practically applied at the factory shop floor to achieve different performance output targets specified by the customer or the manufacturer’s intent.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

1669-1682

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] PlasticsEurope, Plastics - the Facts 2011: An Analysis of European Plastics Production, Demand and Recovery for 2010, 2011.

Google Scholar

[2] ResearchInChina, Global and China Plastic Injection Molding Machine Industry Report, 2009-2010, July 2010.

Google Scholar

[3] R. Kent, Energy Management in Plastics Processing: Strategies, Targets, Techniques and Tools, 1st ed., Plastics Information Direct, Bristol, UK, 2008.

Google Scholar

[4] Reduced Energy Consumption In Plastics Engineering, 2005 European Benchmarking Survey of Energy Consumption and Adoption of Best Practice, September 2005.

Google Scholar

[5] P. Jarosch, J. Wortberg, and T. Kamps, Comparison of Drive Concepts on Injection Molding Machines under Production Conditions, in Proceedings of the Society of Plastics Engineers Annual Technical (ANTEC) Conference, 2004.

Google Scholar

[6] B.F. Taylor, T.W. Womer, and R. Kadykowski, Efficiency Gains and Control Improvements using Different Barrel Heating Technologies for the Injection Molding Process, in Proceedings of the Society of Plastics Engineers Annual Technical (ANTEC) Conference, 2007.

Google Scholar

[7] J.A. Myers, M. Ruberg, R. Waterfield, M. Elsass, and S. Kelsay, Experimental Study on the Energy Efficiency of Different Screw Designs for Injection Moulding, in Proceedings of the Society of Plastics Engineers Annual Technical (ANTEC) Conference, 2008.

Google Scholar

[8] Z.W. Jiao, P.C. Xie, Y. An, X.T. Wang, and W.M. Yang, Development of Internal Circulation Two-Platen IMM for Thermoplastic Polymer, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 211 (2011) 1076-1084.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2011.01.010

Google Scholar

[9] J.M. Dealy, Energy Conservation in Plastics Processing: A Review, Polymer Engineering & Science. 22 (1982) 528-535.

DOI: 10.1002/pen.760220903

Google Scholar

[10] I. Ferreira, O. de Weck, P. Saraiva, and J. Cabral, Multidisciplinary Optimization of Injection Molding Systems, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 41 (2010) 621-635.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-009-0435-8

Google Scholar

[11] A. Weissman, A. Ananthanarayanan, S.K. Gupta, and R.D. Sriram, A Systematic Methodology for Accurate Design-Stage Estimation of Energy Consumption for Injection Molded Parts, in Proceedings of the ASME 2010 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference 2010, Montreal, Quebec, Canada 2010.

DOI: 10.1115/detc2010-28889

Google Scholar

[12] Reduced Energy Consumption In Plastics Engineering, Low Energy Plastics Processing: European Best Practice Guide, October 2006.

Google Scholar

[13] A. Miller and C.F.J. Wu, Parameter Design for Signal-Response Systems: A Different Look at Taguchi's Dynamic Parameter Design, Statistical Science. 11 (1996) 122-136.

DOI: 10.1214/ss/1038425656

Google Scholar

[14] D.V. Rosato, D.V. Rosato, and M.G. Rosato, Injection Molding Handbook, 3rd ed., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, 2000.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-4597-2_16

Google Scholar

[15] S.B. Li, Y. Liu, and D.M. Wu, Influencing Factor of Plasticizing Capacity and Energy Consumption of the Screw in Injection Molding Machine, Plastics. 37 (2008) 85-87 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[16] F. Li, H. Cheng, G.B. Wang, R. Bai, and L. Lu, The Effect of Plasticizing Parameters on the Energy Consumption of Injection Molding Machine, Engineering Plastics Application. 39 (2011) 44-47 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[17] Y. Tian, B.R. Yan, Y.D. He, C.L. Xin, and Q.C. Li, Study on Energy Distribution of Plastic Injection Molding Process Based on LabVIEW, China Plastics. 25 (2011) 105-110 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[18] S.L. Mok, C.K. Kwong, and W.S. Lau, Review of Research in the Determination of Process Parameters for Plastic Injection Molding, Advances in Polymer Technology. 18 (1999) 225-236.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2329(199923)18:3<225::aid-adv3>3.0.co;2-3

Google Scholar

[19] P.K. Bharti, M.I. Khan, and H. Singh, Recent Methods for Optimization of Plastic Injection Molding Process - A Retrospective and Literature Review, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 2(2010) 4540-4554.

Google Scholar

[20] P. Lin, Study on Injection Energy Consumption in the Injection Moulding Machine Experimental System, Master's Thesis in Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China, 2008 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[21] N.Y. Lu, G.X. Gong, Y. Yang, and J.H. Lu, Multi-Objective Process Parameter Optimization for Energy Saving in Injection Molding Process, Journal of Zhejiang University - Science A. 13 (2012) 382-394.

DOI: 10.1631/jzus.a1100250

Google Scholar

[22] C.M. Pang, Study of Injection Molding Process Parameters for Saving Energy, Master's Thesis in Ta Hwa Institute of Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan, 2011 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[23] K. Bhote and A. Bhote, World Class Quality: Using Design of Experiments to Make It Happen, 2nd ed., Amacom, New York, NY, 2000.

DOI: 10.2307/1269965

Google Scholar

[24] J. Antony and A.H.Y. Cheng, Training for Shainin's Approach to Experimental Design using a Catapult, Journal of European Industrial Training. 27 (2003) 405-412.

DOI: 10.1108/03090590310498540

Google Scholar

[25] J. Goodman and D.C. Wyld, The Hunt for the Red X: A Case Study in the Use of Shainin Design of Experiement (DOE) in an Industrial Honing Operation, Management Research News,. 24 (2001) 1-17.

DOI: 10.1108/01409170110782919

Google Scholar

[26] S. Sharma and A.R. Chetiya, Simplifying the Six Sigma Toolbox through Application of Shainin DOE Techniques, Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers. 34 (2009) 13-29.

DOI: 10.1177/0256090920090102

Google Scholar

[27] J. de Mast, A Methodological Comparison of Three Strategies for Quality Improvement, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 21 (2004) 198 - 213.

DOI: 10.1108/02656710410516989

Google Scholar

[28] J. Ledolter and A. Swersey, Dorian Shainin's Variables Search Procedure: A Critical Assessment, Journal of Quality Technology. 29 (1997) 237-247.

DOI: 10.1080/00224065.1997.11979766

Google Scholar

[29] S.H. Steiner, R.J. MacKay, and J.S. Ramberg, An Overview of the Shainin System™ for Quality Improvement, Quality Engineering. 20 (2007) 6-19.

DOI: 10.1080/08982110701648125

Google Scholar

[30] M. Tanco, E. Viles, and L. Pozueta, Comparing Different Approaches for Design of Experiments (DoE), in S.L. Ao and L. Gelman (Editors), Advances in Electrical Engineering and Computational Science, Springer, London, UK, 2009, pp.611-621.

DOI: 10.1007/978-90-481-2311-7_52

Google Scholar

[31] J. Antony, Spotting the Key Variables using Shainin's Variables Search Design, Logistics Information Management. 12 (1999) 325-331.

DOI: 10.1108/09576059910284140

Google Scholar

[32] A.J. Thomas and J. Antony, A Comparative Analysis of the Taguchi and Shainin DOE Techniques in an Aerospace Environment, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 54 (2005) 658-678.

DOI: 10.1108/17410400510627516

Google Scholar

[33] D.C. Montgomery, Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 5th ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2005.

Google Scholar

[34] C. Maier and T. Calafut, Polypropylene: The Definitive User's Guide and Databook, William Andrew Publishing / Plastics Design Library, Norwich, NY, 1998.

Google Scholar

[35] J. Mattis, P. Sheng, W. DiScipio, and K. Leong, A Framework for Analyzing Energy Efficient Injection-Molding Die Design, in Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, Dallas, Texas, United States, 1996.

DOI: 10.1109/isee.1996.501879

Google Scholar

[36] Haitian Plastics Machinery, MA1200 Injection Moulding Machine Instruction Manual, A ed., Ningbo, China, 2010.

Google Scholar