Determination of Flow Curve Using Bulge Test and Calibration of Damage for Ito-Goya Models

Article Preview

Abstract:

The standard uniaxial tensile test is the widely accepted method to obtain relevant properties of mechanical characterization of sheet metal materials. However the range of strain obtained from tensile test is limited. The bulge test is an alternative to obtain ranges of deformation, higher than tensile test, thus permitting a better characterization for material behaviour. This paper presents a sensitivity analysis for some influencing variables used in bulge measurements, thus giving some guidelines for the evaluation of the stress-strain curve from experimental results using a developed experimental mechanical system. Additionally, using bulge test up to fracture shall give material information regarding damage, which in turn may be used to evaluate and calibrate damage models. A methodology is presented to be used for evaluation and calibration of Ito-Goya damage model of damage prediction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

182-189

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Slota, J. and E. Spisak, Determination of flow stress by the hydraulic bulge test. Metallurgy, 2008. 47(1): pp.13-17.

Google Scholar

[2] Stachowicz, F., Biaxial stress-strain relationship of sheet metal from hydraulic bulging test, in International multidisciplinary conference 2003: Vancouver B.C. pp.469-474.

Google Scholar

[3] Keller, S., W. Hotz, and H. Friebe, Yield curve determination using the bulge test combined with optical measurement, in Proceedings of IDDRG 2009, Golden, Colorado, USA. pp.319-330.

Google Scholar

[4] Mutrux, A., B. Hochholdinger, and P. Hora, Procedure for evaluation and validation of hydraulic biaxial experiment, in Numisheet2008: Switzerland Numisheet. pp.67-71.

Google Scholar

[5] Gutscher, G., H.-C. Wu, G. Ngaile, and T. Altan, Determination of flow stress for sheet metal forming using the viscous pressure bulge (VPB) test. Journ. Mat. Proc. Tech., 2004. 146(1): pp.1-7.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00838-0

Google Scholar

[6] Atkinson M., Accurate determination of biaxial stress-strain relationships from hydraulic bulging tests of sheet metals. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 1997. 39(7): pp.761-769.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(96)00093-8

Google Scholar

[7] Ranta-Eskola, A.J., Use of the hydraulic bulge test in biaxial tensile testing. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 1979. 21(8): pp.457-465.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(79)90008-0

Google Scholar

[8] Ito, K., K. Satoh, M. Goya, and T. Yoshida, Prediction of limit strain in sheet metal forming processes by 3D analysis of localized necking. Int. J. Mech. Sciences, 2000. 42(11): pp.2233-2248.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(00)00004-7

Google Scholar

[9] Stören, S. and J.R. Rice, Localized necking in thin sheets. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1975. 23(6): pp.421-441.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(75)90004-6

Google Scholar

[10] M&M Research Inc., NXT Defect Evaluator, 2012.

Google Scholar

[11] Xu Le, Constitutive Modeling of High Strength Steel Sheets, Dep. Ferrous Technology, Graduate Institute of Ferrous Technology, Pohang Univ. Science Technology, Doct. Diss, 2011.

Google Scholar

[12] M.C. Oliveira, J.L. Alves, L.F. Menezes, N.Mori, Gen Uemura, K. Ito, Prediction of fracture limit by instability condition for cleaving action on shear band after 3 dimensional localized bifurcation, Forming Tech. Forum 2012, IVP, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, pp.33-38

Google Scholar

[13] P. Teixeira, F.M.A. Pires, A.D. Santos, J.M.A. César de Sá, K. Ito, N. Mori, Coupled and uncoupled criteria for fracture prediction in sheet metal forming, Forming Tech. Forum 2012, IVP, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, pp.105-108.

Google Scholar