Analysis of Machining Operations of a Femoral Prosthesis Using CAM Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

The studies of biomaterials machinability applied in the medical field are extensive, however many of these studies use models of regular geometry and use elementary machining operations. In this work, a femoral prosthesis with a complex geometric shape was experimental milled using two different commercial Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM) applications. The toolpaths defined in both CAM applications were similar and carefully selected according with the femoral prosthesis geometry. Roughing, semi-finishing and finishing passes were applied in this work. The influence of toolpath strategy was studied and predicted results from software’s simulation were compared with milled part.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

2029-2037

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] B. Ravi , M. Agarwal, Computer-aided Development of Mega Endo-Prostheses, in Bopaya Bidanda and Paolo Bartolo (Eds.), Bio-Materials and Prototyping Applications in Medicine, 2007, pp.1-19.

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-47683-4_10

Google Scholar

[2] Information on http://orthopedics.about.com/od/hipkneereplacement/a/implants.htm

Google Scholar

[3] Information on http://bonesmart.org/hip/hip-replacement-implant-materials/

Google Scholar

[4] J. Lee, H. Chen, C. Luo, F. Chang, Rapid Prototyping and Multi-axis NC Machining for the Femoral Component of Knee Prosthesis, Life Science Journal, Vol. 6, No 3 (2009), pp.73-77.

Google Scholar

[5] N. Galanis, D. Manolakos, Investigation of cutting parameters in manufacturing of femoral heads, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol II, WCE 2009, July 1 - 3, (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] G. Tompkins, P. Lachiewicz, R. DeMasai, A prospective study of a femoral component for cemented total hip arthroplasty, Journal Arthroplasty, nº 6, (1994), pp.623-630.

DOI: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90116-3

Google Scholar

[7] J. Walczak, F. Shahgaldi, F. Heatley, In vivo corrosion of 316L stainless-steel hip implants: morphology and elemental compositions of corrosion products, Biomaterials, 19(1-3), (1998), pp.229-237.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(97)00208-1

Google Scholar

[8] D. Hansen, Metal Corrosion in the Human Body: The Ultimate Bio-Corrosion Scenario, The Electrochemical Society Interface, (2008), pp.31-34.

DOI: 10.1149/2.f04082if

Google Scholar

[9] P. Hallam, F. Haddad, J. Cobb, Pain in the well-fixed, aseptic titanium hip replacement, The Journal of bone and joint surgery, Vol. 86-B, N.º 1, (2004), pp.27-30.

DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b1.14326

Google Scholar

[10] D. Costa, S. Lajarin, Comparison of cranioplasty implants produced by machining and by casting in a gypsum mold, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 58, (2012), pp.1-8.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3388-1

Google Scholar

[12] M. Balažic, J. Kopač, Machining of Titanium Alloy Ti-6Al-4V for Biomedical Applications, Strojniški vestnik - Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 56, (2010), pp.1-5.

Google Scholar

[13] J. Ramsden, D. Allen, D. Stephenson, J. Alcock, G. Peggs, G. Fuller and G. Goch, The Design and Manufacture of Biomedical Surfaces, Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 56/2, (2007), pp.687-711.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.10.001

Google Scholar

[14] J. Abellán-Nebot, H. Siller, C. Vila, C. Rodríguez, An experimental study of process variables in turning operations of Ti–6Al–4V and Cr–Co spherical prostheses, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 63, (2012), p.887–902.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-3955-0

Google Scholar

[15] N. Elmagrabi, C. Hassan, C. Jaharah, F. Shuaeib, High Speed Milling of Ti-6Al-4V Using Coated Carbide Tools, European Journal of Scientific Research, Vol. 22, Nº.2, (2008), pp.153-162.

Google Scholar

[16] A. Wernera, Z. Lechniak, K. Skalski, K. KeÎdzior, Design and manufacture of anatomical hip joint endoprostheses using CAD/CAM systems, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 107, (2000), pp.181-186.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(00)00682-8

Google Scholar

[17] B. Rawal, R. Ribeiro, R. Malhotra, N. Bhatnagar, Design and manufacturing of femoral stems for the Indian population, Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 14, (2012), p.216–223.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2011.12.004

Google Scholar

[18] M. Monreal, C. Rodrigues, Influence of tool path strategy on the cycle time of high-speed milling, Computer-Aided Design, Nº 35, (2003), pp.395-401.

DOI: 10.1016/s0010-4485(02)00060-x

Google Scholar

[19] E. Oberg, F. D. Jones, H. L. Horton, H. Ryffell, Machinery's Handbook (26th edition), in C. J. McCauley,R. Heald and M. I. Hussain (Eds.), Industrial Press Inc, New York, (2000).

Google Scholar

[20] D. Misra, V. Sundararajan, P. Wright, Zig-Zag Tool Path Generation for Sculptured Surface Finishing, in R. Janardan, M. Smid and D. Dutta (Eds.), Geometric and Algorithmic Aspects of Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing, V. 67 (2003), pp.265-279.

DOI: 10.1090/dimacs/067/10

Google Scholar

[21] Y. Huang, J. Oliver, NC Milling Error Assessment and Tool Path Correction, Proceedings of the 21st annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, (1994), pp.287-294.

DOI: 10.1145/192161.192231

Google Scholar