Test Procedures and Simulation Model Calibration Strategies for Nonlinear Stiffness Behavior of Joints in Large-Scale Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

State-of-art models for mechanical joints in large scale structures typically consider only the linear behavior of the joint zones with lower complex approaches, such as rigid or elastic beams or a merge of opposite sheet metal nodes. In the present study several feasible methods to model nonlinear joint behavior and the connection between sheets and joint are investigated and evaluated. A preferred combination based on nonlinear springs was chosen, which meets the requirements for application in large scale structure models: low computation time, mesh independence and availability in several FEM software packages. For the calibration of the joint zone models a 2-point-tension-specimen was used. Five different joint types and the two sheet material combinations aluminium/aluminium as well as steel/steel were investigated. With the calibrated models a more complex 5-point-tension-specimen was used to consider the local interoperation of the joints. Some deviations were determined especially for highly stressed joint zones. Hence an average function was defined to consider both, the local deformations in the joint zone and additionally the more global sheet deformations. Finally, the simplified joint models were used in a complex specimen model with 22 joints. The comparisons between experimentally and numerically determined results show a good accordance. The nonlinear joint behavior is captured very well. A method is presented, which uses 2-point-specimens to calibrate simplified joint models with nonlinear deformation characteristics. The efficient application in large scale structure models is possible due to simplicity, stability, low computation times and mesh independent implementation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)

Pages:

2400-2413

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Dannbauer, C. Gaier and C. Halaszi: Development of a Model for Self-piercing Rivets to Predict Stiffness and Fatigue Life of Automotive Structures, SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-2857, 2003.

DOI: 10.4271/2003-01-2857

Google Scholar

[2] M. Al-Emrani and R. Kliger: FE analysis of stringer-to-floor-beam connections in riveted railway bridges, In: Journal of Constructional Steel Research 59 (2003), pp.803-818.

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(02)00114-1

Google Scholar

[3] B.M. Imam, T.D. Righiniotis and M.K. Chryssanthopoulos: Numerical modelling of riveted railway bridge connections for fatigue evaluation, In: Engineering Structures 29 (2007), pp.3071-3081

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.02.011

Google Scholar

[4] G.J. van der Vegte and Y. Makino: Numerical simulations of bolted connections: The implicit versus the explicit approach, In: Connections in Steel Structures V, Amsterdam - June 3-4 (2004), pp.89-98

Google Scholar

[5] O.S. Bursi and J.P. Jaspart: Benchmarks for Finite Element Modelling of Bolted Steel Connections, In: J. Construct. Steel Res. Vol. 43 (1997), pp.17-42

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(97)00031-x

Google Scholar

[6] O.S. Bursi and J.P. Jaspart: Calibration of a Finite Element Model for Isolated Bolted End-Plate Steel Connections, J. Construct. Steel Res. Vol. 44 (1997), pp.225-262

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(97)00056-4

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Shi, Z. Lin, P. Zhu and S. Han: Impact modeling of the weld line of tailor-welded blank, In: Materials and Design 29 (2008), pp.232-238

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.005

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Zhang and D. Taylor: Optimization of spot-welded structures, In: Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 37 (2001), pp.1013-1022

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-874x(01)00046-4

Google Scholar

[9] F. Vivio: A new theoretical approach for structural modelling of riveted and spot welded multispot structures, In: International Journal of Solids and Structures 46 (2009), pp.4006-4024

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2009.07.021

Google Scholar

[10] O.K. Bedair and G.F. Eastaugh: A numerical model for analysis of riveted splice joints accounting for secondary bending and plates/rivet interaction, In: Thin-Walled Structures 45 (2007), pp.251-258

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2007.03.001

Google Scholar

[11] D. Heiserer, M. Charging and J. Sielaft: High performance, process oriented, weld spot approach, In: First MSC Worldwide Automotive User Conference, Munich, Germany, September (1999)

Google Scholar

[12] A. Beevers, S.M. Steidler, J. Durodola and M. Coackley: Analysis of stiffness of adhesive joints in car bodies, In: Journal of Materials Processing Technology 118 (2001), pp.96-101

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(01)00895-0

Google Scholar

[13] M. Palmonella, M.I. Friswell and J.E. Mottershead and A.W. Lees, In: Finite element models of spot welds in structural dynamics: review and updating, In: Computers and Structures 83 (2005), pp.648-661

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.11.003

Google Scholar

[14] J. Mackerle: Finite element analysis of fastening and joining: A bibliography (1990-2002), In: International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping 80 (2003), pp.253-271

DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(03)00030-9

Google Scholar

[15] R. Neugebauer, F. Jesche, R. Mauermann and S. Hensel: Stiffness analysis of spot joints as a condition for the numeric modelling - new test methods, In: International Journal of Material Forming, August 2009, Volume 2, Issue 1 Supplement, pp.331-334

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-011-1046-7

Google Scholar

[16] R. Neugebauer, S. Hensel and W. Hanel: FE-Ersatzmodelle für Fügepunkte mit nichtlinearem Steifigkeitsverhalten. Hannover : EFB, 2012, 126 pp, EFB-Forschungsbericht 344, ISBN 978-3- 86776-382-0

Google Scholar