Application of Tube Hydroforming in Square Cross-Section Die for Inverse Identification Method Validation

Abstract:

Tube hydroforming processes are an excellent way for manufacturing reduced weight parts with complex shapes in widespread fields. Accurate numerical simulation of tube hydroforming process is particularly based on precise material parameters deduced from experimental tests. The free bulge test is widely employed for the parameter identification of tubular material behavior models by means of analytical [1] and numerical methods [2]. In this context, an inverse identification methodology using free bulge tests was developed. These tests were carried out by means of a new home-designed and manufactured bulge forming machine. The objective of this work is the validation of the inverse identification method using tube hydroforming in square cross-section die. The analysis of this particular hydroforming process with respect to material parameters is performed. For this purpose, circular section tubes made of low carbon steel S235 and aluminum alloy AA6063-O are hydroformed against square-cross sectional die using our bulge forming machine. Afterwards, FE model is constructed to simulate square-sectional hydroformed parts. The influence of some parameters, such as strain hardening exponent, anisotropy parameter and friction coefficient, on numerical square cross-sectional hydroformed part thickness is analyzed. It permits to assess the sensitivity of the thickness relative to used material parameters in the FE model. In order to validate the inverse identification procedure for both materials, experimental thicknesses along the profile of cross-sectional hydroformed parts are measured and compared with the corresponding numerical thicknesses predicted by FE model. It is proven after analyzing the obtained results that the chosen response, i.e. thickness distribution along the profile of the tube hydroforming against the square cross-section die, used for the validation is sensitive to the identified material properties. Particularly, it is demonstrated for low carbon steel S235 that numerical thickness is in good agreement with experimental data. However, for aluminum alloy AA6063-O, a discrepancy between experimental and predicted thicknesses is noticed. Anyway, it is demonstrated that inverse identification approach leads to sufficiently accurate parameters used for numerical tube hydroforming simulations. Furthermore, it seems that Hill48’s yield criterion is more suitable for describing steels plastic behavior than aluminum alloys for tube hydroforming processes. Concerning aluminum alloy, certainly the choice of appropriate yield criterion is of paramount importance on the prediction of tubular plastic behavior in tube hydroforming. Consequently, it is shown that the use of simple tube hydroforming in square-section die is suitable for the validation of FE model which is identified by inverse method using free bulge test.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 554-557)
• Pages: 966-973
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.966
• Online since: June 2013
• Authors: Ali Khalfallah, Temim Zribi, Hedi Belhadj Salah
• Keywords: Flow Stress, Inverse Identification, Square Cross-Section Part, Tube Hydroforming

References

[1] F. Dohmann, Ch. Hartl, Hydroforming – a method to manufacture light-weight parts, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. Vol. 60 (1996) 669-676.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(96)02403-x

[2] S. Fuchizawa, M. Narazaki, Bulge test for determining stress-strain characteristics of thin tubes, In: Advanced technol. Plast. 4th ICTP. (1993) 488-493.

[3] Y.M. Hwang, C.W. Wang, Flow stress evaluation of zinc copper and carbon steel tubes by hydraulic bulge tests considering their anisotropy, J. Mater Proc. Technol. 9 (2009) 4423-4428

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.10.033

[4] P. Bortot, E. Ceretti, C. Giardini The determination of flow stress of tubular material for hydroforming applications, J. Mater. Proc. Technol. 203 (2008) 381-388.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.10.047

[5] R. Velasco, N. Boudeau, G. Michel, Determination of tube hardening law using bulging tets, Int. J. Mater. Form. Suppl 1 (2008) 331-334.

DOI: 10.1007/s12289-008-0062-8

[6] Y. Lianfa, G. Cheng, Determination of stress-strain relationship of tubular material with hydraulic bulge test, Thin-Walled Structures, Vol. 46, (2008) 147-154.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2007.08.017

[7] T. Zribi, A. Khalfallah, H. Belhadjsalah, Inverse Method for flow stress parameters identification of tube hydroforming considering anisotropy, Int. J. of Mechatronics and Manufacturing systems, Vol. 4 N° 5 (2011) 441-453.

DOI: 10.1504/ijmms.2011.043081

[8] M. Strano, T. Altan, An inverse energy approach to determine the flow stress of tubular materials for hydrauforming applications. J. Mater. Process Technol. 146 (2004) 92-96.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2003.07.016

[9] Y. Xu, L.C. Chan, Y.C. Tsein, L. Gao, P.F. Zheng, Prediction of work-hardening coefficient and exponential by adaptive inverse finite element method for tubular material. J. Mater. Process Technol. 201 (2008) 413-418.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.11.269

[10] X. Xianghe, L. Shuhui, Z. Weigang, L. Zhongqin, Analysis of thickness distribution of square sectional hydroformed parts, J. Mater. Process Technol. 209 (2009) 158-164.

[11] Y.M. Hwang, W.C. Chen, Analysis of tube hydroforming in square cross-sectional die, Int. J. of Plasticity 21 (2005) 1815-1833.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.09.004

[12] J.A. Nelder, R. Mead, A simplex method for function minimization, Computer Journal, Vol.7, N°4 (1965) 34-40.