Lamb Wave Based Monitoring of Fatigue Crack Growth Using Principal Component Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fatigue crack growth in metallic plates was monitored using Lamb waves which were generated and captured by surface-mounted piezoelectric wafers in a pitch-catch configuration. Instead of directly pinpointing signal segments to quantify wave scattering caused by the existence of crack damage and related severity, principal component analysis (PCA), as an efficient approach for information compression and classification, was undertaken to distinguish different structural conditions due to fatigue crack growth. For this purpose, a variety of statistical parameters in the time domain as damage indices were extracted from the wave signals. A series of contaminated counterparts with different signal-to-noise ratios were also simulated to increase the statistical size of the data set. It was concluded that PCA is capable of reducing the dimensions of a complex set of original data, whose information can be represented and highlighted by the first few principal components. With the assistance of PCA, the different structural conditions attributable to crack growth can be classified.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

260-267

Citation:

Online since:

June 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Su, Z., L. Ye, and Y. Lu, Guided Lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: a review. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006. 295(3-5): pp.753-780.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020

Google Scholar

[2] Grondel, S., et al., Fatigue crack monitoring of riveted aluminium strap joints by Lamb wave analysis and acoustic emission measurement techniques. NDT & E International, 2002. 35(3): pp.137-146.

DOI: 10.1016/s0963-8695(01)00027-5

Google Scholar

[3] Staszewski, W., B.C. Lee, and R. Traynor, Fatigue crack detection in metallic structures with Lamb waves and 3D laser vibrometry. Measurement Science and Technology, 2007. 18: p.727–739.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/18/3/024

Google Scholar

[4] Leong, W.H., et al., Structural health monitoring using scanning laser vibrometry: III. Lamb waves for fatigue crack detection. Smart Materials and Structure, 2005. 14: p.1387–1395.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/14/6/031

Google Scholar

[5] Kim, S.B. and H. Sohn, Continuous fatigue crack monitoring without baseline data. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 2008. 31: p.644–659.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.2008.01254.x

Google Scholar

[6] Kim, S.B., et al., Applications of an instantaneous damage detection technique to plates with additional complexities. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 2010. 29: p.189–205.

DOI: 10.1007/s10921-010-0077-1

Google Scholar

[7] Rokhlin, S.I., et al., Nondestructive sizing and localization of internal microcracks in fatigue samples. NDT & E International, 2007. 40: p.462–470.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2007.02.001

Google Scholar

[8] Kim, J.-Y. and S.I. Rokhlin, Surface acoustic wave measurements of small fatigue cracks initiated from a surface cavity. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2002. 39: p.1487–1504.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(01)00286-4

Google Scholar

[9] Ihn, J.-B. and F.-K. Chang, Detection and monitoring of hidden fatigue crack growth using a built-in piezoelectric sensor/actuator network: I. Diagnostics. Smart Materials and Structure, 2004. 13: pp.609-620.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/13/3/020

Google Scholar

[10] Staszewski, W.J., C. Boller, and G.R. Tomlinson, Health Monitoring of Aerospace Structures: Smart Sensor Technologies and Signal Processing. New York:: J. Wiley, 2004.

DOI: 10.1002/0470092866

Google Scholar

[11] Mujica, L.E., et al., Q-statistic and T2-statistic PCA-based measures for damage assessment in structures. Structural Health Monitoring, 2011. 10(5): pp.539-553.

DOI: 10.1177/1475921710388972

Google Scholar

[12] Cammarata, M., et al., Application of principal component analysis and wavelet transform to fatigue crack detection in waveguides. Smart Structures and Systems, 2010. 6(4): pp.349-362.

DOI: 10.12989/sss.2010.6.4.349

Google Scholar

[13] Mathwork Inc., Statistics Toolbox, User's Guide,Version 4. 2001.

Google Scholar

[14] Li, F.C., et al., Multiple damage assessment in composite laminates using a Doppler-effect-based fiber-optic sensor. Measurement Science and Technology, 2009. 20: p.115109.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/20/11/115109

Google Scholar

[15] Wang, D., et al., Probabilistic damage identification based on correlation analysis using guided wave signals in aluminum plates. Structural Health Monitoring, 2010. 9(2): pp.133-144.

DOI: 10.1177/1475921709352145

Google Scholar

[16] Lu, Y., et al., Time-domain analyses and correlations of Lamb wave signals for damage detection in a composite panel of multiple stiffeners. Journal of Composite Materials, 2009. 43(26): pp.3211-3230.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998309345332

Google Scholar