Topology Optimization in Support of Spaceborne Device Based on Variable Density Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Support is not load bearing components, but also carrier of other component. To reduce the valid load, mass of the support should be low down under the condition of enough stiffness and strength. Topology optimization is employed here to solve the problem. The finite model must be built up according to the basic structure of analysis object in topology optimization. The supports are typical box-style part with thin-wall. Thus, solid model is adopted in ANSYS, and the element shell93 is employed here. Definition of optimization function based on linear-static analysis was employed here. Take maximum flexibility as the constrain conditions of the structure. And the optimality criterion (OC) method was adapted to the problem due to it is suitable for the problem which target is volume. Define the base plate, face and back of the support as the topology area separately. Main part of support is optimization with the variable density method. The results before and after the optimization are compared. When the topology form is unknown, the best topology relation of the structure in the initiate design stage of the whole product has very important meanings.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

109-113

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. Z. Li, D. Y. Yu, X. R. Ma. Application of Truss Topology Optimization in Spacecraft Structures Engineering. Chinese spacecraft and technology. 4 (2009)1~7.

Google Scholar

[2] H. C. Gea, J. Luo. Topology Optimization of Structures with Geometrical Nonlinearities. Computers and Structures. 79(2001)1977~(1985).

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(01)00117-1

Google Scholar

[3] J. Kiusalass, R. C. J. Shew. Algorithm for Optimal Structural Design with Frequency Constraints. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 13(1978)283~295.

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Luo, L. P. Chen, J. Z. Yang, et al. Fuzzy Tolerance Mutilevel Approach for Structural Topology Optimization. Computers and Structures, 84(2006) 127~140.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.10.001

Google Scholar

[5] M. Zhou, G. N. Rozvany. The COC Algorithm, Part1: Topological, Geometry and Generalized Shape Optimization. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering. 89(1991)197~224.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(91)90046-9

Google Scholar

[6] M. Zhou, G. N. Rozvany. An Optimality Criteria Method for Large System Part2: Algorithm. Structural Optimization. 6(1993)250~262.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01743384

Google Scholar

[7] R. C. Joseph, R. H. Frisbee, J. H. Gilland, etc. Recent Advances in Nuclear Powered Electric Propulsion for Space Exploration. Energy Conversion and Management, 49 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2007.10.015

Google Scholar