Damage Variation in Highway Bridge Piers for Rehabilitation with Different Reinforced Options

Article Preview

Abstract:

Bridges are considered as vital components that require a high degree of protection to guarantee their functionality, even after significant earthquakes. So, the damage evaluation of current conditions of these structures is considered a necessary tool for inspection, maintenance and rehabilitation. Seismic fragility curves of a common highway bridge structure, with simple-supported girders, for different seismic scenarios, are evaluated in this paper. The selected bridge is a RC system with rectangular piers, forming a frame substructure; the bridge piers reinforcement is designed using steel jackets. Damage fragility curves are again evaluated for the reinforced system and compared with the initial condition; for that, a non-linear analyses with Ruaumoko program are accomplished, using a Takeda constitutive model and the damage index proposed by Park et al. As an external seismic action, artificial accelerograms are obtained based on signals registered in the most hazardous earthquake zone of Mexico. The probability changes of a certain damage level are verified for the obtained results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 569-570)

Pages:

254-261

Citation:

Online since:

July 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Shinozuka, M. Effect of seismic retrofit of bridges on transportations networks. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibrations, Vol. 2, No. 2, (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] K. Nasserasadi, M. Ghafory-Ashtiany, S. Eshghi, M. R. Zolfaghari. Developing seismic fragility functions of structures by stochastic approach. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp.183-200, (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] ATC-25, Seismic vulnerability and impact disruption of lifelines in the coterminous United States, Technical report, Applied Technology Council, California, USA, (1997).

Google Scholar

[4] M, Shinozuka, Development of bridge fragility curves, Proceedings, US-Italia in Seismic Evaluation and Reinforcing, MCEER, Multidisciplinary Center on Earthquake Engineering, 93-99, (1998).

Google Scholar

[5] W. Liao and C. Loh, Preliminary study on the fragility curves for highway bridges in Taiwan, Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineering, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp.367-375, (2004).

DOI: 10.1080/02533839.2004.9670883

Google Scholar

[6] B. Olmos, M. Jara Curvas de fragilidad de desplazamiento de puentes con subestructura tipo marco, XVIII Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Sísmica, México, (2011). In Spanish.

Google Scholar

[7] B. G. Nielson and R. DesRoches, Analytical seismic fragility curves for typical bridges in the central and Southeastern United States, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 23, No. 3, pp.615-633, (2007).

DOI: 10.1193/1.2756815

Google Scholar

[8] K. R. Karim and F. Yamazaki, Comparison of empirical and analytical fragility curves for RC bridges in Japan, 8th ASCE Special Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability, (2000).

Google Scholar

[9] K. R. Mackie, B. G. Nielson, Uncertainty quantification in analytical bridge fragility curves, Lifeline Earthquake in a Multi-hazard Environment, ASCE, 148. 206. 91. 180. (2009).

DOI: 10.1061/41050(357)9

Google Scholar

[10] J. Y. Zhang, S. Huo, J. Brandenberg, P. Kashighadi, Effects of structural characterization on fragility functions of bridges subjected to seismic shaking and lateral spreading, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibrations, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp.369-382, DOI: 10. 1007/s 1803. 008. 1009-2, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/s11803-008-1009-2

Google Scholar

[11] J. E, Padgett, R. DesRoches. Methodology for the development of analytical fragility curves for retrofitted bridges, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, No. 37, pp.1157-1174. DOI: 10. 1002/eqe. 801m (2008).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.801

Google Scholar

[12] SAP 2000, Advanced 14. 1, integrated solution for structural analyses and design, Computer and Structures INC.

Google Scholar

[13] A. J. Carr, Ruaumoko 3D, Inelastic dynamic analyses, Civil Engineering Department, University of Canterbury, (2004).

Google Scholar

[14] ACI-318, Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete (ACI-318-02) and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Detroit Michigan, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/0262-5075(85)90031-4

Google Scholar

[15] Priestley, M J y Y J Park. Strength and ductility of concrete bridge columns under seismic loading, ACI Structural Journal, Technical Paper, Title No. 84-S8, (1989).

DOI: 10.14359/2800

Google Scholar

[16] Y. K. Wen, A. H. Nag, J. Park. Seismic damage analysis and design of reinforced concrete buildings for tolerable damage. Proceedings 9th WCEE, Japan (1988).

Google Scholar

[17] AISC, Specifications for Structural Steel Buildings, Chapter 1, Design of composite members. American Institute of Steel Constructions, Inc. (2005).

Google Scholar