Analysis of Silicone Rubber Elastomer Elastic Failure in Small-Size Flexible Joint at Low Temperature

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to study the performance on silicone rubber elastomer in small-size flexible joint at different temperatures, a series tests for two miniature flexible joints (joint-SR1 and joint-SR2) with the same structure and different formula of silicon rubber elastomer (phenyl silicon rubber and dimethyl silicon rubber) were conducted. Axial compressive stiffness and bending stiffness at various temperatures (-60 °C~20 °C) and vessel pressures (1MPa~8MPa) were studied. Results show that the axial compressive stiffness and bending stiffness of joint-SR1 remain stable throughout the temperature range of-60 °C~20 °C, while those remain stable throughout the temperature range of-40 °C~20 °C and become to be infinite at-50 °C due to the elastic failure of elastomer material for the joint-SR2. Analysis indicates that the reason that elastomer of joint-SR2 lost elasticity at-50 °C is not glass-transition but crystallization. The phenomenon of elastic failure did not appear throughout the temperature range-60 °C~20 °C for the joint-SR1 elastomer is due to the existence of phenyl side-group substitute. The modified chain content of silicone rubber not only affects the process of crystallization inhibition but also the crystallization rate. The rubber with phenyl or other bulky side-group could destroy the crystal of silicone rubber at low temperatures, which is beneficial to be applied in small-size flexible joint.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 575-576)

Pages:

427-433

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Zheng Wang, Yongqiang Hu. Solid rocket motor. Beijing: Astronautics Press, (1993).

Google Scholar

[2] U hrig G, Roussille C. Design drivers and technologies for solid propulsion of interceptors. 1st AAAF International conference on Missile Defense. Arcachon, France, February 3-5, (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] Avio. Aster 30 http: /www. aviogroup. com/files/catalog/pdf/motore_per_aster_30_25. pdf.

Google Scholar

[4] Anon. Solid rocket thrust vector control. NASA SP-8114, 1974: 48-52, 37-39, 44-45.

Google Scholar

[5] Lui C Y. Asbestos-free nozzle flexible boot load characterization for the Space Shuttle solid rocket booster. AIAA 96-2778.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1996-2778

Google Scholar

[6] Graves S R, Fonnesbeck J E, Roth R B. Development and certification of the Space Shuttle redesigned solid rocket motor nozzle. AIAA 89-2418.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1989-2418

Google Scholar

[7] Shani S, Putter S, Peretz A. Development of a high-performance flexible joint for thrust vector control. AIAA 95-3017.

DOI: 10.2514/6.1995-3017

Google Scholar

[8] Shengyu Feng, Jie Zhang, Meijiang Li et al. Organic silicone polymer and application. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] Zhengtao Su, Huanghai Qian, Zhian Mi, et al. Dynamic property studies of phenyl silicone rubber. World Rubber Industry, 2005, 32 (8): 3.

Google Scholar

[10] Zhenhua Tang, Zhijian Xie, Liangjing Qu, et al. Phenyl-content effects on the properties of methyl vinyl phenyl silicone rubber. China Rubber Industry, 2007, 54 (11): 610.

Google Scholar

[11] Shuyu Han, Yumin Lei. Researches on domestic phenyl-silicone rubber. Special Purpose Rubber products, 1981 (3): 7.

Google Scholar

[12] Lihua Liu, Shiyan Yang, Zhijie Zhang, et al. Study on ultralow temperature resistance silicone rubber. Silicone material, 2003, 17 (6): 4.

Google Scholar

[13] Fengchun Pi. Studies on processing technologies and applications methyl vinyl phenyl silicone rubber. Special Purpose Rubber Products, 1980: 44.

Google Scholar