Limitations of Similarity Principle in Indentation Testing of Small Samples

Jaroslav Menčík

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.586.47

Paper Titles

Effect of Crystallographic Orientation on Hardness and Indentation Modulus in Austenitic Stainless Steel
p.31

Nanohardness vs. Friction Behavior in Magnetron Sputtered and PECVD W-C Coatings
p.35

Estimation of Local Plastic Deformation of Polycrystalline Materials
p.39

Determination of the Elastic-Plastic Properties of 15Kh2MFA Steel with Austenitic Cladding
p.43

Limitations of Similarity Principle in Indentation Testing of Small Samples
p.47

Indentation Size Effects in Ductile and Brittle Materials
p.51

Nanoindentation Applied to Materials with an Inner Structure
p.55

Mechanical Properties of Aluminum Alloys by Instrumented Indentation: Case Study on Almigo Hard
p.59

Experimental Analysis of Local Stress State and Deformation in the Critical Area of Combustion Engine Cylinder
p.63

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 586Limitations of Similarity Principle in Indentation...

Limitations of Similarity Principle in Indentation Testing of Small Samples

Abstract:

The paper summarizes principles of similarity and shows where they loose their validity in material tests by indentation and what should be considered in their preparation and evaluation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 586)

Pages:

47-50

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.586.47

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Jaroslav Menčík

Keywords:

Mechanical Property, Nanoindentation, Response Mode, Similarity, Testing

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

References

[1] T. Szirtes, Applied Dimensional Analysis and Modeling, McGraw-Hill, New York, (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Menčík et al., Determination of elastic modulus of thin layers using nanoindentation, J. Mater. Res. 12 (1997) 2475-2484.

DOI: 10.1557/jmr.1997.0327

Google Scholar

[3] Y.T. Cheng, C.M. Cheng, Scaling, dimensional analysis, and indentation measurements, Mat. Sci. Eng. R44 (2004) 91-149.

Google Scholar

[4] K. Peter, Sprödbruch und Mikroplastizität von Glas in Eindruckversuchen, Glastechn. Ber. 37 (1964) 333-345.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Němeček, Nanoindentation based analysis of heterogeneous structural materials, in: J. Němeček (Ed. ), Nanoindentation in Materials Science, InTech, Rijeka, 2012, pp.89-108.

Google Scholar

[6] G. Constantinides et al., Grid indentation analysis of composite microstructure and mechanics: Principles and validation, Mater. Sci. Eng. A430 (2006) 189-202.

Google Scholar

[7] K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1985).

Google Scholar

[8] J. Menčík, Uncertainties and errors in nanoindentation, in: J. Němeček (Ed. ), Nanoindentation in Materials Science, InTech, Rijeka, 2012, pp.53-86.

Google Scholar

[9] W.D. Nix, H. Gao, Indentation size effects in crystalline materials: a law for strain gradient plasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 46 (1998) 411-425.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5096(97)00086-0

Google Scholar

[10] J.N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces, 2nd ed., Academic Press, London, (1992).

Google Scholar

[11] J. Menčík, Low-load nanoindentation: Influence of surface forces and adhesion. Chem. Listy 106 (2012) 481-484.

Google Scholar

[12] J. Menčík, Determination of parameters of visco-elastic materials by instrumented indentation. Part 3: Rheological model and other characteristics, Chem. Listy 104 (2010) 275-278.

Google Scholar