Standing Contact Fatigue Analyse of Steels with Different Microstructures

Article Preview

Abstract:

A Standing Contact Fatigue (SCF) test set up has been developed in order to facilitate quick testing of contact fatigue resistance of material surfaces. In this method the sample is pressed against a hard ball rapidly and the resulting crack formation is studied in order to evaluate the SCF resistance. Induction hardened surfaces of cam-ring steel and steels with pearlitic, martensitic, bainitic, ausferritic and quench and tempered microstructures have been studied. Characterization was performed by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and hardness measurements. Ring-cone cracks were found at the edge of the indentations but inside the indent in the surface hardened cam-ring steel samples. Sectional views revealed that these cracks also grow underneath the indentation. Radial cracks were found in non-surface hardened samples. The test of the SCF resistance of steels with different microstructures showed that the ausferritic microstructures tested shoved better SCF resistance than the quench and tempered samples with similar hardness. A comparison between different tempering temperatures of surface hardened steels showed that samples tempered at the higher temperature 240 °C resulted in better SCF resistance.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 592-593)

Pages:

622-626

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Glaeser W. A., Shaffer S. J. Contact fatigue. In ASM Handbook Fat. and Frac. Vol. 19 (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Alfredsson B., Olsson M. Fat. & Fract. of Eng. Mat. & Struc. Vol. 22 (1999) No. 3 pp.225-237.

Google Scholar

[3] Alfredsson B., Olsson M. International journal of fatigue. Vol. 23 (2001) No. 6 pp.533-548.

Google Scholar

[4] Alfredsson B., Olsson M. Fat. & Fract. of Eng. Mat. & Struc. Vol. 26 (2003) No. 7 pp.589-602.

Google Scholar

[5] Ramesh R., Gnanamoorthy R. Materials & design Vol. 27 (2006) No. 2 pp.141-146.

Google Scholar

[6] Cadario A., Alfredsson B. Eng. Fracture mechanics. Vol. 72 (2005) No. 11 pp.1664-1690.

Google Scholar

[7] Dahlberg J., Alfredsson B. Fat. & Fract. of Eng. Mat. & Struc. Vol. 28 (2005) pp.599-613.

Google Scholar

[8] Morris E., Chung F., Chung Y-W. In ASM Handbook Fatigue and Fracture. Vol. 19 (1997).

Google Scholar

[9] Christ H-J. In ASM Handbook Fatigue and Fracture. Vol. 19 (1997).

Google Scholar

[10] Suresh S. Fatigue of materials. Cambridge University Press (1998).

Google Scholar

[11] Ringsberg J. PhD thesis. Chalmers Tekniska Högskola. Göteborg, Sweden (2000).

Google Scholar

[12] Alfredsson B., Olsson M. Engineering Fracture Mechanics. Vol. 65 (2000) No. 1 pp.89-106.

Google Scholar

[13] Ashby M.F. Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. 4th Edition. ISBN 9781856176637.

Google Scholar