Residual Stresses in Machining of AISI 52100 Steel under Dry and Cryogenic Conditions: A Brief Summary

Abstract:

Residual stress is one of the most important surface integrity parameter that can significantly affect the service performance of a mechanical component, such as: contact fatigue, corrosion resistance and part distortion. For this reason the mechanical state of both the machined surface and subsurface needs to be investigated. Residual stress induced by dry and cryogenic machining of hardened AISI 52100 steel was determined by using the X-ray diffraction technique. The objective was to evaluate the influence of the tool cutting edge geometry, workpiece hardness, cutting speed, microstructural changes and cooling conditions on the distribution of the residual stresses in the machined surface layers. The results are analysed in function of the thermal and mechanical phenomena generated during machining and their consequences on the white layer formation.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 611-612)
• Pages: 1236-1242
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.611-612.1236
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Serafino Caruso*, J.C. Outeiro, Domenico Umbrello, António Castanhola Batista
• Keywords: AISI 52100, Cryogenic Cooling, Hard Turning, White Layer

References

[1] N.R. Dhar, S. Paul, A.B. Chattopadhyay, Role of cryogenic cooling on cutting temperature in turning steel, Transactions of the ASME 124, 2002, p.146–154.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1413774

[2] N.R. Dhar, M. Kamruzzaman, Cutting temperature, tool wear, surface roughness and dimensional deviation in turning AISI-4037 steel under cryogenic condition, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 47, 2007, p.754–759.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.09.018

[3] J.A. Bailey, S. Jeelani, S.E. Becker, Surface integrity in machining AISI 4340 steel, Ttrans. ASME, J. Eng. Ind, 1999, 98/3: pp.999-1006.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3438986

[4] J.C. Outeiro, A.M. Dias, J.L. Lebrun, V.P. Astakhov, Machining residual stresses in AISI 316L steel and their correlation with the cutting parameters, Machining Science and Technology, 2002, 6/2: pp.251-270.

DOI: 10.1081/mst-120005959

[5] C.R. Liu, M.M. Barash, Variables governing patterns of mechanical residual stress in a machined surface, ASME J. Eng. Ind., 1982; 104: p.257–264.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3185828

[6] H.K. Tonshoff, H.G. Wobker, D. Brandt, Hard turning influences on the workpiece properties, Trans. NAMRI/SME, 1995, XXIII: pp.215-220.

[7] J. Barry, G. Byrne, Chip formation, acoustic emission and surface white layers in hard machining, Ann. CIRP, 2002; 51: p.65–70.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61467-x

[8] S. Akcan, S. Shah, S.P. Moylan, P.N. Chabra, S. Chandrasekar, H.T.Y. Yang, Formation of white layers in steels by machining and their characteristics, metallurgical and materials transactions, 2002, 33: pp.1245-1254.

DOI: 10.1007/s11661-002-0225-z

[9] D. Umbrello, S. Caruso, J.C. Outeiro, L. Filice, F. Micari, An experimental investigation of residual stresses in hard machining of AISI 52100 steel, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 19, pp.67-72.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.081

[10] I.C. Noyan, J.B. Cohen, Residual stress – measurement by diffraction and interpretation, springer, New York, (1987).

[11] D. Umbrello, Influence of material microstructure changes on surface integrityt in hard machining of AISI 52100 steel, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 54 (9): pp.887-898.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-3003-x

[12] D. Umbrello, S. Caruso, S. Di Renzo, A.D. Jayal, O.W. Dillon, I.S. Jawahir, Dry vs. Cryogenic Orthogonal Hard Machining: an Experimental Investigation, 14th International Esaform Conference on Material Forming, Belfast (United Kingdom), 27–29 April, 2011, Vol. 1353, pp.627-632.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3589585

[13] D. Umbrello, F. Micari, I.S. Jawahir, The effects of cryogenic cooling on surface integrity in hard machining: a comparison with dry machining, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 61, (1), 2012: pp.103-106.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.052

[14] J.D. Thiele, S.N. Melkote, R.A. Peascoe, T.R. Watkins, Effect of cutting-edge geometry and workpiece hardness on surface residual stresses in finish hard turning of AISI 52100 steel, ASME J. Manuf. Sc. & Eng., 2000; 122: pp.642-649.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1286369

[15] Z. Zurecki, R. Ghosh, J.H. Frey, Investigation of white layer formed in conventional and cryogenic hard turning of steels, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Washington, November 2003, pp.16-21.

DOI: 10.1115/imece2003-42313

[16] Field M, Kahles JF. Review of surface integrity of machined components, Ann CIRP 1971, 20: p.107–8.

[17] Bannantine J, Comer J, Handrock J. Fundamentals of metal fatigue analysis, Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall; 1990. p.13–17.

[18] Huang Q, Ren JX. Surface integrity and its effects on the fatigue life of the nickel-based superalloy GH33A, Int J Fatigue 1991; 13: p.326–32.

DOI: 10.1016/0142-1123(91)90359-7

[19] Abrao A, Aspinwall D. The surface integrity of turned and ground hardened bearing steel,. Wear 1996; 196: p.279–84.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(96)06927-x

[20] Matsumoto Y, Hashimoto F, Lahoti G. Surface integrity generated by precision hard turning, Ann CIRP 1999; 48: p.59–62.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63131-x

[21] Y. Matsumoto, F. Hashimoto, G. Lahoti, Surface integrity generated by precision hard turning, Ann. CIRP 48 (1999), p.59–62.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)63131-x