A Virtual Instrument for SEM Uncertainty Analysis

Abstract:

To assure the metrological traceability of a measurement, it is required to perform an analysis of the measurement uncertainty specific to the measurement task. An approach to estimate the measurement uncertainty for complex systems is the so-called virtual measuring instrument: The measuring process is simulated taking into account its influencing parameters and a statistical analysis is performed by means of Monte-Carlo calculations. We present the development of such a virtual measuring instrument for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) which allows to estimate the measurement uncertainty in compliance with GUM for dimensional measuring tasks in nano- and microsystems technology. By application of this virtual instrument, model based corrections of systematic errors are made possible and the cognition of the strength of different perturbing influences can lead to recommendations to optimize measurement instruments and methods. The virtual model programmed in MATLAB is called ‘vREM’, it includes all essential components of the measuring chain of an SEM as modules: The electron source, the electron-optical lens-system, the scan-generator, the interaction of the electrons within the object, electron detectors, simple analysis procedures and consideration of external disturbances. By adjusting parameters uncertainty contributions can be assigned to the virtual probe, the virtual specimen and the virtual detector signals.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 613)
• Pages: 101-107
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.613.101
• Online since: May 2014
• Authors: Dominic Gnieser*, Carl Georg Frase, Harald Bosse, Rainer Tutsch
• Keywords: Measurement SEM, Measurement Uncertainty, Monte Carlo Simulation, Virtual Instrument (VI)

References

[1] R. Schmitt et al.: Virtuelle Messgeräte. Definition und Stand der Entwicklung. Technisches Messen 75 (2008) 5, pp.298-309.

[2] Frase, C. G., Gnieser D., Bosse H. (2009): Model-based SEM for dimensional metrology tasks in semiconductor and mask industry (Topical Review); J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42, 183001 (17pp).

DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/18/183001

[3] D. Gnieser, C.G. Frase, H. Bosse, R. Tutsch: MCSem - a modular Monte Carlo simulation for various applications in SEM metrology and SEM photogrammetry. Poster: 14th European Microscopy Congress (EMC 2008) 1. -5. September 2008, Aachen.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85156-1_275

[4] L. Reimer: Scanning Electron Microscopy. Physics of Image Formation and Microanalysis. Springer Series in Optical Science Vol. 36, 4th edition (1997).

[5] J. Frosien, E. Plies, and K. Anger: Compound magnetic and electrostatic lenses for low voltage applications, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 7, 1874 (1989).

DOI: 10.1116/1.584683

[6] W. Häßler-Grohne, K. Hahm, W. Mirande, H. Bosse, M. Arnz: Calibration of test reticles for qualification of imaging properties of microlithographic projection lenses. Proc. SPIE 4764, 142-150 (2002).

DOI: 10.1117/12.479346

[7] F. Salvat, R. Mayol: Elastic scattering of electrons and positrons by atoms. Schrödinger and Dirac partial wave analysis. Computer Physics Communications 74, 358-374 (1993).

DOI: 10.1016/0010-4655(93)90019-9

[8] H.A. Bethe: Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Korpuskularstrahlen durch Materie. Ann. Phys. 5, 325-400 (1930).

DOI: 10.1002/andp.19303970303