Paper Titles

Preface, Committees, Symposia, Acknowledgements and Support

Bioactivity Assessment of Niobate Apatite
p.3

Bioactivity of a Poly(70lactic-co-30glycolic acid)/15CaO-85SiO₂ Composite with a Dual Pore Structure
p.7

The Influence of Biogenic and Synthetic Starting Materials on the Properties of Porous Hydroxyapatite Bioceramics
p.11

Biocompatible Porous Scaffolds from Derivatized PVA Composites
p.17

Biomimetic Apatite Deposition within Casein-Loaded Hydrogel Scaffolds
p.22

Comparison between the Microstructure of the Mineral Phase in Two Types of Composite Beads for Bone Regeneration
p.26

Effect of Silicon-Doped Calcium Phosphate Bone Substitutes on Bone Formation and Osteoblastic Phenotype Expression In Vivo
p.31

Influence of Time on Thermal Oxidation of CP-Ti Grade II at 850 °C
p.35

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 614Biocompatible Porous Scaffolds from Derivatized...

Biocompatible Porous Scaffolds from Derivatized PVA Composites

Article Preview

Abstract:

Introduction: Many polymer supports for cell seeding formulations based on chitosan are usually prepared by chemical cross-linking with glutaraldehyde, urea formaldehyde, epichlorohydrine, even if the chemical cross-linking agents possibly induce toxicity and other undesirable effects. Experimental: Derivatized poly (vinyl alcohol) was blended and foamed with chitosan to produce porous scaffolds with improved elastic and mechanical properties and also acceptable water solubility. Derivatized PVA (in example phosphorylated PVA) (P-PVA) also exhibited improved hydrophilicity, anionic properties and molecular electrostatic repulsion, and retained the bulk morphological features, compatible property, and solution stability. Results: Porous scaffolds formed by derivatized PVA crosslinked with chitosan proved a good cytocompatibility for human fibroblasts. Viability and apoptosis assays were performed indicating that this porous scaffold allow cell multiplication and scarce apoptotic induction. Conclusion: Tested porous scaffolds may represent an interesting support for three dimensional cell cultures destined to simulate tumor or normal tissue microenvironment.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Bioceramics 25: Supplement

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 614)

Pages:

17-21

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.614.17

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Tudor Petreus, Carmen Elena Cotrutz, Paul Dan Sirbu*, Lucian Barbu Tudoran, Doinita Olinici, Laurentiu Badescu, Oana Petreus, Bogdan Alexandru Stoica

Keywords:

Biocompatibility, Phosphorylated Foams, Porous Scaffold

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M.T. Taghizadeh, N. Sabouri, B. Ghanbarzadeh, SpringerPlus, 2 (2013) 376.

[2] Y.G. Song, H. Jang, K.D. Park, M.D. Kim, C.W. Kim, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy, (2013).

DOI: 10.3109/13645706.2013.826674

[3] S. Tsujiyama, A. Okada, Biotechnol Lett, 35 (2013) 1907-(1911).

[4] A.F. Leitao, S. Gupta, J.P. Silva, I. Reviakine, M. Gama, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 111C (2013) 493-502.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2013.06.031

[5] D. Cristancho, Y. Zhou, R. Cooper, D. Huitink, F. Aksoy, Z. Liu, H. Liang, J.M. Seminario, Journal of molecular modeling, 19 (2013) 3245-3253.

DOI: 10.1007/s00894-013-1828-6

[6] A. Abdulkhani, E. Hojati Marvast, A. Ashori, Y. Hamzeh, A.N. Karimi, International journal of biological macromolecules, 62C (2013) 379-386.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.08.050

[7] M. Albert, M.V. Kiefer, W. Sun, D. Haller, D.L. Fraker, C.M. Tuite, S.W. Stavropoulos, J.I. Mondschein, M.C. Soulen, Cancer, 117 (2011) 343-352.

DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25387

[8] C.P. Derdeyn, C.J. Moran, D.T. Cross, H.H. Dietrich, R.G. Dacey, Jr., AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 16 (1995) 1335-1343.

[9] R.C. DiLuccio, M.A. Hussain, D. CoffinBeach, G. Torosian, E. Shefter, A.R. Hurwitz, Pharmaceutical research, 6 (1989) 844-847.

DOI: 10.1023/a:1015900303534

[10] X. Li, M.A. Kanjwal, L. Lin, I.S. Chronakis, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 103 (2013) 182-188.

DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2012.10.016

[11] A. Javadi, Q. Zheng, F. Payen, A. Javadi, Y. Altin, Z. Cai, R. Sabo, S. Gong, ACS applied materials & interfaces, 5 (2013) 5969-5975.

DOI: 10.1021/am400171y

[12] Z. Qi, C. Yamamoto, N. Imori, A. Kinukawa, K.C. Yang, G. Yanai, E. Ikenoue, Y. Shen, Y. Shirouzu, A. Hiura, K. Inoue, S. Sumi, Cell transplantation, 21 (2012) 525-534.

DOI: 10.3727/096368911x605448

[13] D.L. Deskins, S. Ardestani, P.P. Young, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, (2012).

[14] M.I. Baker, S.P. Walsh, Z. Schwartz, B.D. Boyan, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 100 (2012) 1451-1457.

[15] H. Dashtdar, M.R. Murali, A.A. Abbas, A.M. Suhaeb, L. Selvaratnam, L.X. Tay, T. Kamarul, Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2723-5

[16] B.S. Wong, S.L. Yoong, A. Jagusiak, T. Panczyk, H.K. Ho, W.H. Ang, G. Pastorin, Advanced drug delivery reviews, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.08.005

[17] A. Islam, M. Riaz, T. Yasin, International journal of biological macromolecules, 59 (2013) 119-124.

[18] L.L. Dias, H.S. Mansur, C.L. Donnici, M.M. Pereira, Biomatter, 1 (2011) 114-119.

[19] J. van Meerloo, G.J. Kaspers, J. Cloos, Methods in molecular biology, 731 (2011) 237-245.