Paper Titles

Preface, Scientific Committee and Sponsors

A Survey of Surface Texture Characterization with Two and Three-Dimensional Contact Methods
p.3

Accuracy Analysis of Fringe Projection Systems Based on Blue Light Technology
p.9

A Comparative of 3D Surface Extraction Methods for Potential Metrology Applications
p.15

A Strategy for Geometric Error Characterization in Multi-Axis Machine Tool by Use of a Laser Tracker
p.22

Accuracy and Reliability Control of Machining Operations on Machining Centres
p.32

Comparison of Double Flank Roll Testers for Worm and Worm Gear
p.39

Double Flank Roll Testing as Verification Technique for Micro Gears
p.45

Development of a Behaviour Curve for Quality Evaluation with Optoelectronic Profilometers
p.51

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 615A Comparative of 3D Surface Extraction Methods for...

A Comparative of 3D Surface Extraction Methods for Potential Metrology Applications

Article Preview

Abstract:

The number of factors influencing the CT process for metrology applications increases its complexity and cause the loss of accuracy during CT measurements. One of the most critical is the edge detection also called surface extraction or image segmentation, which is the process of surface formation from the CT`s volume data. This paper presents different edge detection methods commonly used in areas like machine and computer vision and they are analyzed as an alternative to the commonly and commercially used for CT metrology applications. Each method is described and analyzed separately in order to highlight its advantages and disadvantages from a metrological point of view. An experimental comparative between two of them is also shown.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Manufacturing Systems

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 615)

Pages:

15-21

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.615.15

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2014

Authors:

Sinué Ontiveros-Zepeda, José Antonio Yagüe-Fabra*, Roberto Jiménez, Francisco Javier Brosed Dueso

Keywords:

Computed Tomography, Edge Detection, Metrology

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] VDI/VDE 2630-1. 2. Computed Tomography in Dimensional Measurement-Influencing Variables on Measurement Results and Recommendations for Computed Tomography Dimensional Measurements. (2010).

[2] J.P. Kruth, M. Bartscher, S. Carmignato, R. Schmitt, L. De Chiffre, A. Weckenmann. Computed Tomography for Dimensional Metrology. CIRP Annals, 60 (2009) 821-842.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.006

[3] R.C. Gonzalez, R.E. Woods. Digital Image Processing. Addison Wesley (1993).

[4] K. Kiekens, F. Welkenhuyzen, Y. Tan, P. Bleys, A. Voet, J.P. Kruth, W. Dewulf. A test object with parallel grooves for calibration and accuracy assessment of industrial computed tomography (CT) metrology. Measurement Science and Technology, 22 (2011).

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/22/11/115502

[5] H. Kalinic. Atlas-based image segmentation: A Survey. Croatian Scientific Bibliography. (2009).

[6] Ding, F., Leow, W.K., Wang, S.C. Segmentation of 3D CT volume images using a single 2D atlas. ICCV Workshop on Computer Vision for Biomedical Image Applications. 3765 (2005) 459-468.

DOI: 10.1007/11569541_46

[7] D. Pham, C. Xu, J. Prince. Current methods in medical image segmentation. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2 (2000) 315–337.

DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.2.1.315

[8] S. Osher, R. Fedkiwy. Level Set Methods: An Overview and Some Recent Results. Journal of Computational Physics. 169 (2001) 463–502.

DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6636

[9] J. Montagnat, H. Delingette, N. Ayache. A review of deformable surfaces: topology, geometry and deformation. Image and Vision Computing. 19 (2001) 1023–1040.

DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(01)00064-6

[10] Y. J. Zhang. Quantitative Study of 3D Gradient Operators. Image and Vision Computing. 11 (1993) 611-622.

DOI: 10.1016/0262-8856(93)90057-n

[11] P. Bhattacharya, D. Wild. A new Edge Detector for Grey Volumetric Data. Computers in Biology and Medicine. 26 (1996) 315-328.

DOI: 10.1016/0010-4825(96)00003-0

[12] R. Mehrotra, S. Zhan. A Zero-crossing-based Optimal Three-dimensional Edge Detector. CVGIP Image Understanding. 59 (1994) 242-253.

DOI: 10.1006/ciun.1994.1016

[13] O. Monga, R. Deriche, J. M. Rocchisani. 3D Edge Detection using Recursive Filtering. Computer, Vision, Graphics and Image Processing. 53 (1991) 76-87.

DOI: 10.1016/1049-9660(91)90006-b

[14] T. A. Clarke, M. A. R. Cooper, J. G. Fryer. An Estimator for the Random Error in Subpixel Target Location and its use in the Bundle Adjustment. Optical 3-D Measurements Techniques. 2 (1993) 161-168.

DOI: 10.1117/12.169832

[15] A. J. Tabatabai, O. R. MitcheU. Edge Location to Subpixel Valúes in Digital Imagery. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions. 6 (1984) 188-201.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1984.4767502

[16] S. Chitchian, T.P. Weldon, M.A. Fiddy, N.M. Fried. Combined Image-Processing Algorithms for Improved Optical Coherence Tomography of Prostate Nerves. Journal of Biomedical Optics. 15 (2010) 0460141.

DOI: 10.1117/1.3481144

[17] K. Rathnayakaa, T. Sahamaa, M. Schuetza B. Schmutza. Effects of CT image segmentation methods on the accuracy of long bone 3D reconstructions. Medical Engineering & Physics. 33 (2011) 226–233.

DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.10.002

[18] J. Canny. A Computational Approach to Edge Detection. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transaction. 8 (1986) 679–698.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851

[19] R. Duda, P. Hart, D. Stork. Pattern classication, second ed., John Wiley & Sons, (2001).

[20] S. Thilagamani1, N. Shanthi. A Survey on Image Segmentation Through Clustering. International Journal of Research and Reviews in Information Sciences. 1 (2011).

[21] P.K. Sahoo, S. Soltani, A.K.C. Wong , Y. Chen. A Survey of Thresholding Techniques. Computer Graphics and Image Process. 41 (1988) 233-260.

DOI: 10.1016/0734-189x(88)90022-9

[22] S.U. Le, S.Y. Chung, R.H. Park. A Comparative Performance Study of Several Global Thresholding Techniques for Segmentation. Graphical Models and Image Processing. 52 (1990) 171-190.

DOI: 10.1016/0734-189x(90)90053-x

[23] C.A. Glasbey. An analysis of histogram-based thresholding algorithms, Graphical Models and Image Processing. 55 (1993) 532-537.

DOI: 10.1006/cgip.1993.1040

[24] L. Shapiro, G. Stockman. Computer Vision. Prentice Hall. (2002).

[25] S.U. Indira, A.C. Ramesh A C. Image Segmentation Using Artificial Neural Network and Genetic Algorithm: A Comparative Analysis. International Conference on Process Automation, Control and Computing (PACC), Coimbatore. 1 (2011) 1-6.

DOI: 10.1109/pacc.2011.5979059

[26] K. Wen-Xiong, Y. Qing-Qiang, L. Run-Peng. The Comparative Research on Image Segmentation Algorithms. First International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science. 2 (2009) 703-707.

[27] S. Beucher, C. Lantuéjoul, Use of watersheds in contour detection. Proceedings of International Workshop on Image Processing, Real-time Edge and Motion Detection/Estimation. (1979).

[28] S. Raut, M. Raghuvanshi, R. Dharaskar, A. Raut. Image Segmentation – A State Of Art Survey for Prediction. International Conference on Advanced Computer Control. (2008) 420-424.

DOI: 10.1109/icacc.2009.78

[29] R. Jiménez, S. Ontiveros, S. Carmignato, J.A. Yagüe. Correction strategies for the use of a conventional micro-CT cone beam machine for metrology applications Procedia CIRP. 2 (2012) 34-37.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2012.05.035

[30] S. Ontiveros, J.A. Yagüe-Fabra, R. Jiménez, G. Tosello, S. Gasparin, A. Pierobon, S. Carmignato, H.N. Hansen. Dimensional Measurement of micro moulded parts by Computed Tomography. Measurement Science and Technology. 23 (2012) 125401.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/23/12/125401