A Survey of Surface Texture Characterization with Two and Three-Dimensional Contact Methods

Abstract:

Nowadays there is a huge interest in new and improved three-dimensional techniques of surface finishing degree measuring and behaviour investigation. Several fields of application are mainly dependent of advances in surface metrology, as for instance aerospace and rail transport, telecommunications or micro-technology. All 3D measuring tools must be designed starting from a bi-dimensional basis and keeping a clear knowledge of their operating principle. This is then the key that defines the borders of this works path. Looking at the finishing degree of three differently obtained surfaces, preliminary comparison of results in two and three dimensions will be finally presented. All constraints defined by this problems conditions must be taken in consideration once the results are analysed.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 615)
• Pages: 3-8
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.615.3
• Online since: June 2014
• Authors: Felix Calvo, Alfredo Sanz-Lobera*, Adrian A. Negre, Roberto Fernandez
• Keywords: 3D Measurement, Roughness, Surface Finishing, Waviness

References

[1] Thomas, T.R., 1999. Rough Surfaces, World Scientific Publishing Company, 2nd Edition ISBN: 978-1-86094-100-9.

[2] Li, T., 2011. Softgauges for surface texture, PhD thesis, University of Huddersfield.

[3] ISO 25178-6: 2010, Geometric specification of products (GPS) Finishing Quality: Areas. Part 6: Methods classification for Finishing Quality Measurement.

[4] National Institute of Standards and Technology. Mechanical Metrology Division. Reference Software for 3D Surface Analysis 2013. http: /physics. nist. gov/VSC/jsp/index. jsp.

[5] Greenwood ,J.A., Williamson, J. B. P., 1966. Contact of Nominally Flat Surfaces, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Vol 295, 1442 pp.300-319.

DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1966.0242

[6] Sahoo, P., Ghosh, N., 2007. Finite Element Contact Analysis of Fractal Surfaces, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, Vol. 40, pp.4245-4252.

DOI: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/14/021

[7] Popov, V.L., Filippov, A.E., 2010. Force of friction between fractal rough surface and elastomer, Technical Physics Letters , vol 36, num 6 pp.525-527.

DOI: 10.1134/s1063785010060118

[8] Gao ,J., Fu, X., 2012. Fractal Model for the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Goose Down Assembly, Advanced Science Letters, vol 10, num 1 pp.666-668.

DOI: 10.1166/asl.2012.3367

[9] Torkhov, N.A., Bozhkov, V.G., 2009. Fractal character of the distribution of surface potential irregularities in epitaxial n-GaAs, Semiconductors, vol 43, num 5, pp.551-556.

DOI: 10.1134/s1063782609050017

[10] Robbe-Valloire, F., 2001. Statistical analysis of asperities on a rough surface, Wear, Vol 249, num 5–6 401-408.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(01)00548-8

[11] Antoniadis, A., Savakis, C., Bilalis, N., Balouktsis, A., 2003. Prediction of Surface Topomorphy and Roughness in Ball-End Milling, Int J of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol 21, num 12, pp.965-971.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-002-1418-8

[12] Wu, J.J., 2000. Simulation of rough surfaces with FFT, Tribology International, vol 33, num 1, pp.47-58.

[13] Nemoto, K., Yanagi, K., Aketagawa, M., Yoshida, I., Uchidate, M., Miyaguchi, T., Maruyama, H., 2009. Development of a roughness measurement standard with irregular surface topography for improving 3D surface texture measurement, Meas Sci Tech, vol 20 num 8. pp.1-7.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/20/8/084023