Laser Tracker Error Modeling and Kinematic Calibration Strategy

Article Preview

Abstract:

Calibration of Laser Tracker systems is based most times in the determination of its geometrical errors. Some standards as the ASME B89.4.19 [1] and the VDI 2617-10 [2] describe different tests to calculate the geometric misalignments that cause systematic errors in Laser Tracker measurements. These errors are caused not only because of geometrical misalignments and other sources of error must also be taken in count. In this work we want to state the errors in a kinematic form. Errors will be split in two different components, geometric and kinematic errors. The first ones depend on the offsets, tilts and eccentricity of the mechanical and optical components of the system. Kinematic errors are different for every position of the Laser tracker, so they will be formulated as functions of three system variables: distance (R), vertical angle (V) and horizontal angle (H) usually called d, φ and θ. The goal of this work is to set up an evaluation procedure to determine geometric and kinematic errors of Laser Trackers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

63-69

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ASME B89. 4. 19-2006 Standard Performance Evaluation of Laser-Based Spherical Coordinate Measurement Systems. www. asme. org.

Google Scholar

[2] VDI/VDE 2011 Accuracy of Coordinate Measuring Machines: Characteristics and their Checking: Acceptance and Reverification Tests of Laser Trackers (Düsseldorf: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) VDI/VDE 2617 part 10.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Muralikrishnan, D. Sawyer, C. Blackburn, S. Philips, B. Borchardt, W. T. Estler 2009 AMSE B89. 4. 19 performance evaluation tests and geometric misalignments in laser trackers J. Res. Natl Inst. Stand. Technol. pp.114-21–35.

DOI: 10.6028/jres.114.003

Google Scholar

[4] B. Hughes, A. Forbes, A. Lewis, W. Sun, D. Veal, K. Nasr, Laser tracker error determination using a network measurement, Measurement Science and Technology, vol. 22, no. 4 (2011) p.045103.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/22/4/045103

Google Scholar

[5] R. Loser, S. Kyle, Alignment and field check procedures for the Leica Laser Tracker LTD 500, Boeing Large Scale Optical Metrology Seminar (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] J. Denavit, R.S. Hartenberg, A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices, J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME 77 (1955) pp.215-21.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4011256

Google Scholar

[7] S. A. Hayati, M. Mirmirani Improving the absolute positioning accuracy of robot manipulators. s. l. : Journal of Robotics Systems, Vol. 2 (1985) pp.397-413.

DOI: 10.1002/rob.4620020406

Google Scholar

[8] T. Takatsuji, M. Goto, S. Osawa, R. Yin, T. Kurosawa, Whole-viewing-angle cat's-eye retroreflector as a target of laser trackers. Meas. Sci. Technol. 10 (1999) pp.87-90.

DOI: 10.1088/0957-0233/10/7/403

Google Scholar