Uncertainty Assessment in Terrestrial Laser Scanner Measurements

Article Preview

Abstract:

Abstract. The essential purpose of this study is to develop the measurement procedures in order toevaluate the quality of the observations carried out using Terrestrial Laser Scanner (TLS) equipment.It tries, in addition, to estimate an uncertainty value that allows the users to know the reliability of theinstrument measurements. The fundamental idea of this paper is to show the metrological control'sneed, and the quality of measure's evaluation for TLS equipment and to describe a working methodology,able to be reproducible, without the essential need of having a very complex infrastructure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

88-94

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] http: /hds. leica-geosystems. com/en/Mining-Exploration_853. htm.

Google Scholar

[2] D. D. Lichti and S. J. Gordon: Error Propagation in Directly Georeferenced Terrestrial Laser Scanner Point Clouds for Cultural Heritage Recording. FIG Working Week 2004. Athens, Greece (2004).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Alba, F. Roncoroni, A. Giussani, M. Scaioni and P. Valgoi: Geometric Modelling of Large Dams by Terrestrial Laser Scanning. XXIII FIG International Congress, Munich, Germany (2006).

Google Scholar

[4] I. Greenway: Standards-their vital role. XXIII FIG International Congress, Munich, Germany (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML: JCGM 100: 2008 Evaluation of Measurement Data-Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (2008).

Google Scholar

[6] http: /www. bipm. org.

Google Scholar

[7] R. Kaarls: BIPM Proc. -Verb. Com. Int. Poids et Mesures 49, A1-A12 (1981).

Google Scholar

[8] R. Staiger: Push the Button - or Does the Art of Measurement Still Exist?. International Federation of Surveyors. Article of the Month (2009).

Google Scholar

[9] http: /www. geotrade. hu/index. php?page=letoltes&spage=fajl&id=57.

Google Scholar

[10] http: /www. oceanscan. net/gallery/PDFs/Leica%20HDS6200%20BRO_en. pdf.

Google Scholar

[11] http: /hds. leica-geosystems. com/downloads123/hds/hds/ScanStation%20C10/brochuresdatasheet/Leica_ScanStation_C10_DS_en. pdf.

DOI: 10.1179/sre.2006.38.302.703

Google Scholar

[12] R. Staiger: Geometrical Quality of Laser Scans. FIG Working Week 2005 and GSDI-8, Cairo, Egypt (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] J. M. Rüeger and R. Gottwald: Field Tests and Checks for Electronic Tacheometers. Trans Tasman Surveyor, 4, 18-26 (2001).

Google Scholar

[14] Y. Reshetyuk: Calibration of Terrestrial Laser Scanners Callidus 1. 1, Leica HDS 3000 and Leica HDS 2500. Survey Review, 38(302), 703-713 (2006).

DOI: 10.1179/sre.2006.38.302.703

Google Scholar

[15] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology: JCGM 101: 2008. Evaluation of measurement data. Supplement 1 to the Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo method (2008).

Google Scholar