Environmental Comparison between a Hot Extrusion Process and Conventional Machining Processes through a Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Abstract:

Nowadays manufacturing technologies have to be evaluated not only for the technical features they can provide to products, but also considering the environmental perspective as well. As long as the technological feasibility of a given process is guaranteed, processes minimizing resources and energy consumption have to be selected for manufacturing. With respect to this topic, the research studies in the domain of metal processing technologies predominantly focus on conventional material removal processes as milling and turning. Despite some exceptions, many other non-machining technologies, such as metal forming processes, are still not well documented in terms of their energy and resource efficiency, and related environmental impact. In this paper, an environmental challenge between two traditional technologies is developed: the environmental performances of a partial hot extrusion process and of a turning processes are quantified and compared. A Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach is implemented to properly analyze the considered processes. The material production step and the manufacturing phase to obtain a simple axy-symmetric aluminum component is considered for the Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) data collection step. Besides, the material and consumables usage and the consumed electrical power are measured in order to quantify the energy consumption of the manufacturing phase. Further, the environmental impacts related to the manufacturing of the extrusion dies and of the turning process are included in the analysis. The paper presents an early step of a wider research project aiming at identifying the greenest technologies as functions of given product features.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 622-623)
• Pages: 103-110
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.622-623.103
• Online since: September 2014
• Authors: Giuseppe Ingarao*, Paolo Claudio Priarone, Francesco Gagliardi, Rosa Di Lorenzo, Luca Settineri
• Keywords: Aluminum (Al), Hot Extrusion, LCA, Machining, Sustainable Manufacturing

References

[1] J.R. Duflou, J. Sutherland, D. Dornfeld, C. Herrmann , J. Jeswiet, S. Kara, M. Hauschild, K. Kellens, Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A processes and systems approach, CIRP Ann. - Manuf. Technol. 61/2 (2012) 587-609.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2012.05.002

[2] CO2PE! - Cooperative Effort on Process Emissions in Manufacturing, Information on www. co2pe. org.

[3] F. Zhao, W. Z. Bernstein, G. Naik, G. J. Cheng, Environmental assessment of laser assisted manufacturing: case studies on laser shock peening and laser assisted turning, J. Clean. Prod. 18 (2010) 1311-1319.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.04.019

[4] M.F. Rajemi, P.T. Mativenga, A. Aramcharoen, Sustainable machining: selection of optimum turning conditions based on minimum energy considerations, J. Clean. Prod. 18 (2010) 1059-1065.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.025

[5] G. Campatelli, L. Lorenzini, A. Scippa, Optimization of process parameters using a Response Surface Method for minimizing power consumption in the milling of carbon steel, J. Clean. Prod., http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. jclepro. 2013. 10. 025.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.025

[6] A. Vijayaraghavan, M. Helu, Enabling technologies for assuring green manufacturing, in: D.A. Dornfeld (Ed. ), Green Manufacturing: Fundamentals and Applications, Springer Science + Business Media, New York, 2013, pp.255-267.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6016-0_11

[7] J. Yan, L. Li., Multi-objective optimization of milling parameters - the trade-offs between energy, production rate and cutting quality, J. Clean. Prod., http: /dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. jclepro. 2013. 10. 031.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.030

[8] J.C. Aurich, B. Linke, M. Hauschild, M. Carrella, B, Kirsch, Sustainability of abrasive processes, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol. 62 (2013) 653-672.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2013.05.010

[9] K. Kellens, Renaldi, W. Dewulf, J.P. Kruth, J.R. Duflou, Environmental Impact Modeling of Selective Laser Sintering Processes, accepted for publication in the Rapid Prototyping Journal, (2014).

DOI: 10.1108/rpj-02-2013-0018

[10] W.R. Morrow, H. Qi, I. Kim, J. Mazumder, S.J. Skerlos, Environmental aspects of laser-based and conventional tool and die manufacturing, J. Clean. Prod. 15 (2007) 932-943.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.030

[11] G. Ingarao, R. Di Lorenzo, F. Micari, Sustainability issues in sheet metal forming processes: an overview, J. Clean. Prod. 19 (2011) 337-347.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.005

[12] J. P. Santos, M., Oliveira, F. G. Almeida, J. P. Pereira, A. Reis, Improving the environmental performance of machine-tools: influence of technology and throughput on the electrical energy consumption of a press-brake, J. Clean. Prod. 19 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.10.009

[13] G Ingarao, H. Vanhove, K. Kellens, J. R. Duflou, A comprehensive analysis of electric energy consumption of single point incremental forming processes, J. Clean. Prod., http: /dx. doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. jclepro. 2013. 12. 022.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.12.022

[14] M. A. Dittrich, T.G. Gutowski, J. Cao, J.T. Roth, C. Xia, V. Kiridena, F. Ren, H. Henning, Exergy analysis of incremental sheet forming, Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 6 (2012) 69-177.

DOI: 10.1007/s11740-012-0375-9

[15] M.F. Ashby, Materials and the environment, second edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, (2013).

[16] G. Hammond, C. Jones, Inventory of carbon and Energy (ICE), Annex B: how to account for recycling a methodology for recycling, The University of Bath, Bath, UK, (2010).

[17] T. A. Mayyas, A. Qattawi, A. R. Mayyas, M. A. Omar, Life cycle assessment-based selection for a sustainable lightweight body-in-white design, Energy 39 (2012) 412-425.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.12.033

[18] T. Devoldere, W. Dewulf, W. Deprez, B. Willems, J. Duflou, Improvement Potential for Energy Consumption in discrete Part Production machines. Advances in life cycle engineering for sustainable manufacturing businesses, Part 3 (2007) 311-316.

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84628-935-4_54

[19] R. L. Milford, J. M. Allwood, J. M. Cullen, Assessing the potential of yield improvements, through process scrap reduction, for energy and CO2 abatement in the steel and aluminium sectors, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.05.021

[20] R. Kervick, C.A. Blue, P.B. Kadolkar, T. Ando, H. Lu, K. Nakazawa, H. Mayer, G. Mochnal, Enhancement of Aluminum Alloy Forgings through Rapid Billet Heating, final techical report, U.S. department of Energy, Energy efficiency and renewable Energy, (2006).

DOI: 10.2172/886705