Effects of Nonconstant Strain Rate on Forming Limit and Efficiency in High Pressure Pneumatic Forming of Ti-Alloy Components

Abstract:

A process with gas pressure up to 70MPa is introduced, which is called High Pressure Pneumatic Forming (HPPF), comparing to superplastic forming (SPF) with pressure lower than 5MPa. HPPF process can be used to form tube blank at lower temperature with high energy efficiency and also at higher strain rate than SPF. With Ti-3Al-2.5V Ti-alloy tube, the potential of HPPF was studied through experiment in the temperature range of 700~850°C. To know the formability of the Ti-alloy tube, HPPF experiments of a large expansion tube and a square cross-section tube were carried out at different temperature and pressure. The limit expansion ratio and limit radius were measured to evaluate the forming limit of Ti-3Al-2.5V tube within HPPF. The results show that the lower the pressure, the better formability and the lower efficiency. At a constant pressure, the strain rate increases exponentially with bulging time during the free bulging procedure, but decreases exponentially during the small corner calibration. Through EBSD pictures, the deformation mechanism of the corner forming process in HPPF was analyzed. Because of a nonconstant strain rate deformation state and complicated stress and strain state during HPPF, the microstructure at the transition zone of the components are also nonhomogenous, but the grains are refined to a certain extent. Key words: HPPF, Ti-3Al-2.5V, limit expansion ratio, corner forming

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 622-623)
• Pages: 347-352
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.622-623.347
• Online since: September 2014
• Authors: Gang Liu*, Jian Long Wang, Ze Jun Tang, Yong Wu
• Keywords: Corner Forming, HPPF, Limit Expansion Ratio, Ti-3Al-2.5V

References

[1] Siegert, K., Haussermann, M., Losch, B., Rieger, R., 2000, Recent developments in hydroforming technology, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, pp.251-258.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(99)00206-x

[2] Doege, E., Elend, L.E., and Meiners, F., 2000, Comparative Study of Massive and Sheet Lightweight Components Formed of Different Lightweight Alloys for Automotive Applications, Automotive & Transportation Technology, pp.87-94.

[3] HE Zhu-bin, TENG Bu-gang. Mechanical properties and formability of TA2 extruded tube for hot metal gas forming at elevated temperature[J]. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2012: 479-484.

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(12)61749-x

[4] G. Liu, K. H. Wang, Y. Xu, B. Wang, S. J. Yuan. An approach to improve thickness uniformity of TA15 tubular part formed by gas bulging process. Advanced Materials Research, 2013: 651-657.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.712-715.651

[5] R. Neugebauer, T. Altan, M. Geiger, M. Kleiner, A. Sterzing. Sheet metal forming at elevated temperatures[J]. Annals of the CIRP, 2006, 55(2): 793-816.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2006.10.008

[6] P. Amborn, K. Kipry, P. Groche, D. Elsenheimer. HEATforming as a Further Development of Tube Hydroforming approaching Massive Forming[J]. Proc of the 9th Forming Colloquium Darmstadt, 2006: 89-103.

[7] R. BOISSIERE, S. TERZI, J.J. BLANDIN, L. SALVO. Quick-plastic forming: similarities and differences with Super-Plastic forming[J]. 6th EuroSPF conference, 2008: 1-9.

[8] L. Vadillo, M.T. Santos, M.A. Gutierrez, I. Pérez, B. González, V. Uthaisangsuk. Simulation and experimental results of the hot metal gas forming technology for high strength steel and stainless steel tubes forming[J]. Materials Processing and Design: Modeling, Simulation and Application, 2007: 1199-1204.

DOI: 10.1063/1.2740973

[9] Pin-Hou Sun, Horng-Yu Wu, Hsin-Han Tsai, Chih-Chao Huang, Ming-Da Tzou. Effect of pressurization profile on the deformation characteristics of fine-grained AZ31B Mg alloy sheet during gas blow forming[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2010: 1673-1679.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.05.021

[10] P. Song, X. S. Wang, C. Han, Y. C. Xu, S. J. Yuan. Filling behavior of transition corner in hydroforming of aluminum alloy rectangular section tube[J]. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2010: 59-64.

DOI: 10.3901/jme.2010.12.059

[11] Liu, G., Tang, Z.J., He, Z.B., et al., 2010, Warm hydroforming of magnesium alloy tube with large expansion ratio, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, p.2071-(2075).

DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(09)60419-2

[12] Yeong-Maw Hwang, Wen-Chih Chen. Analysis of tube hydroforming in a square cross-sectional die[J]. International Journal of Plasticity, 2005: 1815-1833.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2004.09.004

[13] Y. Liu, X. Wu. A microstructure study on an AZ31 magnesium alloy tube after hot metal gas forming process[J]. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 2007: 354-359.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-007-9062-y