Elastic Blocks: Hydrogel-Embedded Granules as Bone Grafting Substitutes

Article Preview

Abstract:

NanoBone® Block is the alternative to autogenous bone blocks and offers doctors a rapid, simple operating procedure in combination with a low risk of complications. Aim of this work was to develop a bone grafting block with elastic properties for dental and orthopedic surgery which is ready to use. An easy handling has to be connected with quick regeneration. Therefore, NB granules have been combined with an elastic hydrogel carrier based on Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and silica sol. Mechanical properties were optimized for an enhanced handling by cross linking and simultaneous sterilization of the PVP with gamma radiation. Cross linked PVP has the capability of swelling in water without being solved. To approve biocompatibility of adjusted material an in vivo study was analyzed using a standardized bone defect model in rat tibiae. Defect was filled with elastic bone grafting material. After 21 and 63 days rats were sacrificed and tibias analyzed. Histomorphological analysis showed an increased bone formation but even a decelerated resorption of elastic biomaterial. Quantitative compositional analysis showed a decrease in silicon content of granules as a process of matrix change.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

414-419

Citation:

Online since:

November 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] C. Mertens and H. Steveling: Use of Synthetic Bone Blocks as an Alternative to Autologous Bone Block Grafts. Implants, International Magazine of Oral Implantology 2009, 4: 30-32.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Xu, G. Holzhüter, H. Sorg, D. Wolter, S. Lenz, T. Gerber, B. Vollmar: Early matrix change of a nanostructured bone grafting substitute in the rat. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials 2009, 91: 692–699.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31445

Google Scholar

[3] S. Benamer, M. Mahlous, A. Boukrif, B. Mansouri, S. Larbi Youcef: Synthesis and characterisation of hydrogels based on poly(vinyl pyrrolidone). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Pyhsics Research 2006, B248, pp.284-290.

DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2006.04.072

Google Scholar

[4] A. B. Lugao, S. M. Malmonge: Use of radiation in the production of hydrogels. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research 2001, B 185: 37-42.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-583x(01)00807-2

Google Scholar

[5] C. Ganz, W. Xu, G. Holzhüter, W. Götz, B. Vollmar, T. Gerber: Comparison of bone substitutes in a tibia defect model in Wistar-rats. Key Engineering Materials 2012, Vols. 493-494, pp.732-738.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.493-494.732

Google Scholar

[6] M. Kirchhoff, S. Lenz, K.O. Henkel, B. Frerich, G. Holzhüter, S. Radefeldt, T. Gerber: Lateral augmentation of the mandible in minipigs with a synthetic nanostructured hydroxyapatite block. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B Applied Biomaterials 2011 Feb, 96(2), pp.342-50.

DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31775

Google Scholar

[7] W. Xu, C. Ganz, U. Weber, M. Adam, G. Holzhüter, D. Wolter, B. Frerich, B. Vollmar, T. Gerber: Evaluation of injectable silica-embedded nanohydroxyapatite bone substitute in a rat tibia defect model. International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6: 1543-52.

DOI: 10.2147/ijn.s19743

Google Scholar