The Influence of Microstructure of Medium Carbon Heat-Treatable Steel on its Tribological Properties

Article Preview

Abstract:

The hereby work presents the influence of microstructure on the tribological properties of medium carbon heat-treatable steel. These steel is used for various elements of which in addition to high wear resistance a high plasticity is required. For tested steel there different heat treatments were performed in order to obtain the different microstructure and properties. Each sample was hardened from the same temperature, which has been selected on the basis of standards for these steel and it was equal 890 °C. Two samples were quenched after austenitising in water. After quenching one of the samples was cooled in liquid nitrogen for 30 minutes (sub-zero treatment). After that these two samples were tempered in the preheated furnace at 200 °C for 2 hours. The third sample immediately after austenitising was quenched in mixture of molten salts heated to 200 °C (fused salt quenching). After these three carried out heat treatments the various microstructures were obtained with preserved high hardness. After heat treatment samples for the tribological test were prepared. The test was performed using the T-05 type roll-block test machine. This type of test machine is used to obtain the resistance to friction wear of metals and others. Thanks to these tribological tests and mass loss measurements the best heat treatment, which significantly increase of the wear resistance for tested steels was indicated.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

132-135

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.F. Stratton, in.: Proc. of the 1st Int. Conf. on Heat Treatment and Surf. Eng. of Tools and Dies, Pula, Croatia, 8. -11. 6. 2005, p.11 – 19.

Google Scholar

[2] D.N. Collins, J. Dormer, Deep Cryogenic Treatment of a D2 Cold-Work Tool Steel, in: Heat Treatment of Metals 24 1997, p.71 – 74.

DOI: 10.1179/174951508x446376

Google Scholar

[3] P. Jurči, J. Sobotová, J. Cejp, P. Salabová and O. Prikner, Effect of Sub-zero Treatment on Mechanical Properties of Vanadis 6 PM Ledeburitic Tool Steel, in: Metal 2010 18. – 20. 5. 2010, Rožnov pod Radhoštěm, Česká Republika.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2014.10.004

Google Scholar

[4] D. Candane, N. Alagumurthi and K. Palaniradja, Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on Microstructure and Wear Characteristics of AISI M35 HSS, in: International Journal of Materials Science and Applications. Vol. 2, 2013, pp.56-65.

DOI: 10.11648/j.ijmsa.20130202.14

Google Scholar

[5] A. Akhbarizadeh, A. Shafyei and M.A. Golozar, Effects of cryogenic treatment on wear behavior of D6 tool steel, in: Materials and Design 30 , 2009, p.3259–3264.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.11.016

Google Scholar

[6] T.V. Sreerama Reddy, T. Sornakumar, M. Venkatarama Reddy and R. Venkatram, Machining Performance of Low Temperature Treated P-30 Tungsten Carbide Cutting Tool Inserts, in: Cryogenics 48, 2008, p.458–461.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.06.001

Google Scholar

[7] V. Leskovesk, M. Kalin and J. Vizintin, Influence of Deep-Cryogenic Treatment on Wear Resistance of Vacuum Heat-Treated HSS, in: Vacuum 80, 2006, p.507 – 518.

DOI: 10.1016/j.vacuum.2005.08.023

Google Scholar

[8] K. Vadivel, R. Rudramoorthy, Performance Analysis of Cryogenically Treated Coated Carbide Inserts, in: International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 42, 2009, p.222 – 232.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1597-z

Google Scholar

[9] B.R. Ramji, H.N. Narasimha Murthy and M. Krishna, Analysis of Roughness and Flank Wear in Turning Grey Cast Iron Using Cryogenically Treated Cutting Tools, in: Research Journal of Applied Sciences , Engineering and Technology 2(5), 2010, pp.414-417.

Google Scholar

[10] R.F. Barron, Low Temperature Properties of Engineering Materials, Cryogenic Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996, p.15–23.

Google Scholar

[11] T.P. Sweeny, Deep Cryogenics: The Great Cold Debate, in: Heat Treat., 18(2), 1986, p.28–32. D.N. Collins, Deep Cryogenic Treatment of Tool Steels, A Review, in: Heat Treat. Met., 1996, 2, p.40–42.

Google Scholar

[12] E.S. Zhmud, Improved Tool Life After Shock Cooling, in: Met. Sci. Heat Treat., 22 (10), 1980, p.3–5.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00700558

Google Scholar

[13] R.F. Barron, Do Treatment at Temperature Below 120 F Help Increase the Wear Resistance of Tool Steels? Here Are Some Research Findings That Indicate They Do, in: Heat Treat., p.14–17.

Google Scholar

[14] S.S. Gill, J. Singh, R. Singh and H. Singh, Effect of Cryogenic Treatment on AISIM2 High Speed Steel: Metallurgical and Mechanical Characterization, in: Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance 21 (7), (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-011-0032-z

Google Scholar

[15] R. Dziurka, J. Pacyna and T. Tokarski, Effect of Heating Rate on Phase Transformations During Tempering of Cr-Mn-Mo Alloy Steels, in: Metal 2013: 22nd International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials 2013 pp.700-705.

Google Scholar

[16] P. Bala, J. Pacyna and J. Krawczyk, The microstructure changes in high-speed steels during continuous heating from the as-quenched state, in: Kovove Materialy-Metallic Materials, 49, 2011, pp.125-130.

DOI: 10.4149/km_2011_2_125

Google Scholar