Substrate Selection and Management Strategies for Aqueous EPD

Abstract:

Classical EPD has typically been conducted in organic solvent media. Many suitable solvents are volatile and highly flammable and this limits the industrial application of the technique on the basis of safety alone. Aqueous EPD may be seen as a safer method, but issues relating to electrolysis and surface energy phenomena become prominent and can create interferences and variability unless the substrate type and its preparation are compatible with the aqueous EPD chemistry and its deposition method. As EPD layers become thinner, factors such as substrate surface structure and wettability become more critical. Industrial processes utilising some principles of EPD for applying paint from water-based preparations are well established in the metal finishing sector. Consequently there is a significant body of practical experience available from this sector that can be of use in translating classical EPD from a solvent to an aqueous technique while avoiding interferences inherent in the use of water as the deposition medium. In this paper, substrate selection is discussed in relation to the electrolyte content of the system where phenomena such as dissolution and micro-arcing can occur. The initial wetting of the substrate must be considered prior to applying voltage. Surface preparation techniques and the methods of introducing the substrate into the EPD dispersion all can have an impact on the final result. Note: This paper is based on the authors’ personal and practical experience of industrial electrophoretic painting over more than 40 years. Only metal substrates are discussed because these have been almost exclusive in this sector during that time. Non-metal substrates such as conductive plastics, graphite and carbon fibre have also been coated with electrophoretic paints but this is not yet at any significant scale and so no general principles have been established

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 654)
• Pages: 10-14
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.654.10
• Online since: July 2015
• Authors: Peter Hope*, Janet Hope
• Keywords: Cleaning, Metallurgy, Pretreatment, Substrate, Surface Energy, Water Electrolysis

References

[1] H. C. Hamaker, Formation of a deposit by electrophoresis, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1940, 35, 279.

DOI: 10.1039/tf9403500279

[2] Wheeler P. Davey, Process for making and applying japan, U.S. Patent 1, 294, 627. (1919).

[3] William Arthur Williams, Electrodeposition of rubber, U.S. Patent 1, 769, 659. (1930).

[4] J.B. Brennan, Leona Marsh, Corrosion resistant coating, U.S. Patent 2, 346, 658. (1944).

[5] R. G. Hart, H.E. Townsend, Mechanism of Cathodic Electrocoat Primer Cratering, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. USA, (1983).

DOI: 10.4271/831818

[6] G.L. Burnside, G.E.F. Brewer, Electrophoretic coating process, U.S. Patent 3, 200, 057 (1965).

[7] P. Hope, Electrolyte control in small scale industrial Electrocoat painting processes, in: A.R. Boccaccini, O. Van der Biest, J.B. Talbot (Eds. ), Electrochemical Society Proceedings, 2002, 21, 167-174.

[8] P. Hope, The role of particle filtration in industrial scale EPD processes, in: A.R. Boccaccini, O. Van der Biest, R. Clasen (Eds. ), Key Engineering Materials Vol. 314, Trans Tech Publications Switzerland, 2006, 251-256.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.314.251

[9] Robert N. Wenzel, Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water, Ind. Eng. Chem. 1936, 28, 988-994.

DOI: 10.1021/ie50320a024

[10] A.B.D. Cassie, S. Baxter, Wettability of porous surfaces, Trans. Faraday Soc., 1944, 40, 546-551.

DOI: 10.1039/tf9444000546