The Development of Wool-Based Passive Filters Toimprove Indoor Air Quality

Article Preview

Abstract:

It is well known that wool carpets and upholstery permanently remove many gaseous pollutants from the air, thus improving indoor air quality, and peoples’ wellbeing. The aim of the work reported here was to develop wool-based filters that could be used in homes and offices to improve indoor air quality. The abilities of wool, jute, and some other materials used in building interiors, to absorb common indoor air pollutants, formaldehyde, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides were compared. Testing was conducted in a chamber that reproduced the conditions found in a typical room. Wool and jute were found to give high levels of absorption and the results were used to design six types of wool-based filters that were intended to be compact, with high rates and capacities of absorption. The filters were passive, relying on high surface areas and diffusion, rather than forced air circulation, thus minimising their net environmental impact. Filters based on wool yarn, roving, balls and unbacked carpet, were all very effective, absorbing between 94 and 96% of the air pollutants over six hours. This study has shown that wool-based passive filters can significantly improve indoor air quality, and represent a new use for wool.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

219-224

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B.O. Brooks, W.F. Davis, Understanding Indoor Air Quality, CRC, Boca Raton, USA, (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] P.E. Ingham, S.M. Causer, R.C. McMillan, The role of wool carpets in controlling indoor air pollution, Proc. Text. Inst. Conf. Blackpool, UK, (1994).

Google Scholar

[3] S. McNeil, Removal of Indoor Air Contaminants by Wool Carpet, AgResearch Technical Bulletin, AgResearch, Christchurch, New Zealand, (2014).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Walsh, A. Black, A. Morgan, G.H. Crawshaw, Sorption of SO2 by typical indoor surfaces, Atmos. Environ. 11 (1977) 1107-1111.

DOI: 10.1016/0004-6981(77)90242-6

Google Scholar

[5] P. Ingham, Fire Safety of Wool Carpets, WRONZ Technical Bulletin, Wool Research Organisation of New Zealand, Christchurch, New Zealand, (1999).

Google Scholar

[6] S. McNeil, Acoustic Advantages of Wool Carpeting, AgResearch Technical Bulletin, AgResearch, Christchurch, New Zealand, (2014).

Google Scholar

[7] P. Martini, M.J. Spearpoint, P.E. Ingham, Low-cost wool-based fire blocking inter-liners for upholstered furniture, Fire Safety J. 45 (2010) 238-248.

DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.03.005

Google Scholar

[8] R.A. McCall, S.J. McNeil, Comparison of the energy, time and water usage required for maintaining carpets and hard floors, Indoor Built Environ. 16 (2007) 482-486.

DOI: 10.1177/1420326x07082781

Google Scholar

[9] W. Meade, Consumer Properties of Carpets, WRONZ Technical Bulletin, Wool Research Organisation of New Zealand, Christchurch, New Zealand, (1998).

Google Scholar

[10] S.J. McNeil, M.R. Sunderland, L.I. Zaitseva, Closed-loop wool carpet recycling, Resour. Conserv. Recy. 51 (2007) 220-224.

DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.09.006

Google Scholar

[11] W.H. Rees, Heat insulation properties of carpets, Carpet Rev. 23 (1969) 39-51.

Google Scholar

[12] P.E. Ingham, M.R. Sunderland, S.J. McNeil, R. Marazzi, Lanasan NCF: Nanoparticles enhance carpet performance, Int. Dyer, 191 (2006) 23-25.

Google Scholar

[13] S.J. McNeil, L.S. Tapp, The design and initial evaluation of visual cues in carpets to assist walking, J. Text. Inst. ahead-of-print (2015).

Google Scholar

[14] K. Corscadden, J. Biggs, D. Stiles, Sheep's wool insulation, Res. Cons. Recy. 86 (2014) 9-15.

Google Scholar

[15] N.A.G. Johnson, E.J. Wood, P.E. Ingham, S.J. McNeil, I.D. McFarlane, Wool as a technical fibre, J. Text. Inst, 94 (2003) 26-41.

Google Scholar

[16] U.R. Amrit, Bedding textiles and their influence on sleep. AUTEX Res. J. 8 (2007) 252-254.

Google Scholar

[17] C. Garrow, L.J. Stephens, M.R. Ewing, Evaluation of surgical masks: The potential of resin-treated wool, Surgery, 69 (1971) 881-883.

Google Scholar

[18] S.J. McNeil, Heavy metal removal using wool filters, Asian Text. J. 10 (2001) 88-90.

Google Scholar

[19] J.A. Schutz, W. Humphries, A Study of wool/polypropylene nonwovens as an alternative to the Hansen filter, Text. Res. J. 80 (2010) 1265-1277.

Google Scholar

[20] S.J. Leighs, S.J. McNeil, W.J. Meade, Wool filtration media opportunities and applications. Visions for Fibres and Textiles Conference, Melbourne, Australia, (2012).

Google Scholar

[21] T. Kinney, Wool: Master's Design Thesis, University of Texas, Austin, USA, (2014).

Google Scholar

[22] R.H.T. Barker, M.E. Taylor, P. Johnstone, C. van Koten Biodegradation of Wool Carpet Pile, AgResearch Technical Bulletin, AgResearch, Christchurch, New Zealand, (2013).

Google Scholar

[23] P. Gibbs, The land recycling option for wool carpet. Carpet Recycling UK Conference, 2009, UK.

Google Scholar

[24] V.V. Kadam, L.R. Meena, S. Singh, D.B. Shakyawar, S.M.K. Naqvi, Utilization of coarse wool in agriculture for soil moisture conservation. Indian J. Small Ruminants, 20 (2014) 83-86.

Google Scholar

[25] R.S. Górecki, M.T. Górecki, Utilization of waste wool as substrate amendment in pot cultivation of tomato, sweet pepper, and eggplant. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 19 (2010) 1083=1087.

Google Scholar

[26] V.D. Zheljazkov, Wool-waste as organic nutrient source. Waste Management, 29 (2009) 2160-2164.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.03.009

Google Scholar

[27] Information on www. campaignforwool. org/2014/10/14/biodegradable-wool-test-complete.

Google Scholar