Effect of Plasters/Coatings on the Thermo-Physical Behavior of Light Weight Pond Ash Blocks Based on Non Autoclaving Technique

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the present study effect of different plasters like cement plaster, mud, cow dung and coatings like paint, hydrated lime, charcoal on the thermo – physical properties such as thermal conductivity, overall thermal transmittance, resistance of Light Weight Blocks (LWB) using pond ash has been evaluated. Result of the study state that, cow dung is the best amongst all other plasters used. Cow dung increases thermal resistance of Light Weight Block (LWB) from 0.391 to 0.505 m2K/W. Thermal resistance increased by using other plasters lies between 0.391 to 0.505 m2K/W. The study of curing of LWB from 56 days to 90 days has been made and it is found that thermal conductivity is reduced by 5% and thermal resistance is increased by 3% comparing the duration of curing from 56 to 90 days. Further, effect of activator on the compressive strength & demolding time has also been studied. When activator is used, there is an increase in compressive strength at 56 & 90 days at all levels of replacement when compared to without activator. Reduction in demolding time from 48 hrs. varies between 6 – 12 hrs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

78-87

Citation:

Online since:

February 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. R. Samidi: First report research project on lightweight concrete, University Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor Bahru, (1997).

Google Scholar

[2] Application on Litebuilt @ Aerated and Composite Concrete by PTY LTD.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Keertama, S.S. Mani and M Thenmozhi: Utilization of eco sand and flyash in aerated concrete for the richest mix design. Int. Journal of Engg. Science & Tech. Vol3 (2011), pp.299-304.

Google Scholar

[4] M.R. Jones & A. McCarthy : Preliminary views on the potential of foamed concrete as a structural material. Mag. Concr. Res. 57 (1), pp.21-31, (2005).

DOI: 10.1680/macr.2005.57.1.21

Google Scholar

[5] S. Chandra and L Berntsson : Lightweight aggregate concrete: science, technology and applications, Noyes Publications.

Google Scholar

[6] O.A. Kayali and M.N. Haque : A new generation of structural lightweight concrete" ACI, SP-121, pp.569-588, (1997).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Berra and G. Ferrara: Normal weight and total-lightweight high strength concretes: A comparative experimental study, SP-121, pp.701-7334, (1990).

DOI: 10.14359/2576

Google Scholar

[8] J.V. Martins, P.V. Hobbs, R.E. Weiss and P. Artaxo, Sphericity and morphology of smoke particles from biomass burning in Brazil. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 103, No. D24, p.32, 051 - 32, 057, (1998).

DOI: 10.1029/98jd01153

Google Scholar

[9] Q. Tang, G. Liu, C. Zhou and R. Sun, Distribution of trace elements in feed coal and combustion residues from two coal-fired power plants at Huainan, Anhui, China. Fuel, Vol. 107, pp.315-322, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.01.009

Google Scholar

[10] Concrete Masonry Units-Specification, Preformed Foam Cellular Concrete Blocks BIS 2185, (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] Methods of test for autoclaved cellular concrete products, IS 6441 (part V).

Google Scholar

[12] Specifications for 43 grade Ordinary Portland Cement, BIS 8112, (2005).

Google Scholar

[13] C.W. Tang: Hydration behaviour of cement pastes containing high volume mineral admixtures, Computers & Concrete, pp.17-38, (2010).

DOI: 10.12989/cac.2010.7.1.017

Google Scholar

[14] G. Rudnai: Lightweight concretes, Budapest, Akademikiado, (1963).

Google Scholar

[15] IS: 3346, Method for determination of thermal conductivity of thermal insulation materials (Two slab, Guarded hot plate method).

Google Scholar

[16] V. Sood, B.M. Suman, & A. Kumar : Effect of admixtures on the physical properties of non – autoclaved light weight blocks using pond ash, IJoRT, Vol. 3 Issue 8, (2014).

Google Scholar

[17] B.M. Suman & V. Kumar, Thermal behaviour of EPS concrete (2012), The Indian concrete journal Vol. 86 No. 6, pp.56-59, (2012).

Google Scholar

[18] B.M. Suman, R.K. Srivastava & R. Chauhan: Procd. Trends & Challenges in structural engineering & construction technologies, CBRI, (2009).

Google Scholar

[19] BRN 12, Non – erodible mud plaster on mud wall for rural housing, CBRI.

Google Scholar

[20] N. Narayan & K. Ramamurthy, Micro structural investigations on aerated concrete, Cem & Concr Res, pp.457-64, (2000).

Google Scholar

[21] K. Ramamurthy, E.K. Kunhanandan, G.I. S Ranjani:, A classification of studies on the properties of foam concrete, Cement & Concrete Composites, pp.388-396, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.04.006

Google Scholar