Role of MIMICS© in Reconstructive Neurosurgery - A Case Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the past few years, medicine has become more and more technical, or better yet more dependent on technology. The current paper presents a case study and is the proof of the efficiency, usefulness and future applicability of an interdisciplinary partnership between clinicians from neurosurgery medical imaging department and engineers. The clinical case analyzed was of a 37 years old woman who had suffered a major cranial trauma at the level of frontal bone. Each step taken for the patient’s treatment and her evolution was thoroughly analysed. The patient’s DICOM (CT) scan was imported in MIMICS© Materialise NV. Regarding the exercise, with the help of MIMICS, the appropriate surgical technique agreed upon by the multidisciplinary work group was frontal bone exposure and bone fragment removal. The MIMICS© utilisation should become a constant of medical activity and involve a wider range of specialities, because it offers a visual aid and suggestions for practical cases. It also offers a good economical alternative, and it is time effective

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

200-204

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Aydin, B. Kucukyuruk, B. Abuzayed, S. Aydin, G.Z. Sanus, Cranioplasty: Review of materials and techniques, J Neurosci Rural Pract., 2 (2011) 162–167.

DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.83584

Google Scholar

[2] N. Basheer, D. Gupta, A, K, Mahapatra, H. Gurjar, Cranioplasty following decompressive craniotomy in traumatic brain injury: Experience at Level - I apex trauma centre, Indian Journal of Neurotrauma (IJNT), 7 (2010) 139-144.

DOI: 10.1016/s0973-0508(10)80029-2

Google Scholar

[3] Z.Y. Ng, I. Nawaz, Computer-designed PEEK implants: a peek into the future of cranioplasty?, J Craniofac Surg., 25 (2014) 55-58.

DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e3182a2f7b6

Google Scholar

[4] A. Tasiou, K. Vagkopoulos, I. Georgiadis, A.G. Brotis, H. Gatos, K.N. Fountas, Cranioplasty optimal timing in cases of decompressive craniotomy after severe head injury: a systematic literature review, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery, 1 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.inat.2014.06.005

Google Scholar

[5] E.B. O'Reilly, S. Barnett, C. Madden, B. Weich, B. Mickey, S. Rozen, Computed-tomography modeled polyether ether ketone (PEEK) implants in revision cranioplasty, J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 68 (2015) 329-338.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2014.11.001

Google Scholar

[6] B. J. Kim, K.S. Hong, K.J. Park, D.H. Park, Y.G. Chung, S.H. Kang, Customized Cranioplasty Implants Using Three-Dimensional Printers and Polymethyl-Methacrylate Casting, J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 52 (2012) 541–546.

DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2012.52.6.541

Google Scholar

[7] J. Vekatesan, S.K. Kim, Chitosan Composites fore bone tissue engineering – an overview, Mar Drugs, 8 (2010) 2252-2266.

Google Scholar

[8] I.C. Stancu, D.M. Dragusin, E. Vasile, R. Trusca, I. Antoniac, D.S. Vasilescu, Porous calcium alginate-gelatin interpenetrated matrix and its biomineralization potential, JMS: MM, 22 (2011) 451-460.

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-011-4233-7

Google Scholar

[9] M.D. Vranceanu, I. Antoniac, F. Miculescu, R. Saban, The influence of the ceramic phase on the porosity of some biocomposites with collagen matrix used as bone substitutes, JOAM, 14 (2012) 671–677.

Google Scholar

[10] I. Antoniac, M.D. Vranceanu, A. Antoniac, The influence of the magnesium powder used as reinforcement material on the properties of some collagen based composite biomaterials, JOAM 15 (2013) 667-672.

Google Scholar

[11] J. Rau, I.V. Antoniac, G. Cama, V. Komlev, A. Ravaglioli, Bioactive Materials for Bone Tissue Engineering, Biomed Research International, article ID 3741428 (2016) 3 pages.

DOI: 10.1155/2016/3741428

Google Scholar

[12] R. Marinescu, I.V. Antoniac, D. Laptoiu, A. Antoniac, D. Grecu, Complications related to Biocomposite Screw Fixation in ACL Reconstruction Based on Clinical Experience and Retrieval Analysis, Materiale Plastice 52 (2015) 340-344.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-09230-0_43-1

Google Scholar

[13] T. Petreus, B.A. Stoica, O. Petreus, A. Goriuc, C.E. Cotrutz, I.V. Antoniac, L. Barbu-Tudoran, Preparation and cytocompatibility evaluation for hydrosoluble phosphorous acid-derivatized cellulose as tissue engineering scaffold material, JMS-MM, 25 (2014).

DOI: 10.1007/s10856-014-5146-z

Google Scholar

[14] E. Battistella, S. Mele, I. Foltran, I.G. Lesci, N. Roveri, P. Sabatino, L. Rimondini, Cuttlefish bone scaffold for tissue engineering: a novel hydrothermal transformation, chemical-physical, and biological characterization, Journal of Applied Biomaterials and Fundamental Materials, 10 (2012).

DOI: 10.5301/jabfm.2012.9257

Google Scholar