The Gephi Network Visualisation of the Guided Bone Regeneration Process Induced with Tissue Engineered Grafts

Article Preview

Abstract:

The goal of this study was to create a Gephi network visualisation of the guided bone regeneration induced by tissue-engineered grafts using a histological score. Bioengineered bone grafts were obtained using CD 1 mice mesenchymal stem cells seeded on red deer antler scaffolds. Both basal and complex osteogenic media were used as osteogenic inducers of mesenchymal stem cells in the bioengineering process.Bone defects (5 mm in diameter) in the cranial bone of CD1 mice were surgically induced. Bone reconstruction was not performed in surgically induced bone defects in the control group, consisting of 30 subjects. In the study group, consisting of 60 subjects, bone reconstruction was performed using tissue engineered bone grafts. Subjects were sacrificed 2 and 4 months after surgery. Bone regeneration was assessed using a histological record.Comparative analysis of the bone regeneration process between the groups was performed using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) , network analysis and the visual results were performed using Gephi software.The created Gephi network indicates a more advanced bone regeneration stage for subjects in the study group sacrificed after 4 months.The Gephi networks reveal the time evolution of the bone regeneration process, the nodes size and edges complexity increasing from subjects sacrificed at 2 months to those sacrificed at 4 months.At each stage, two and four months after surgery, bone regeneration was more advanced in the study group than in the control group and it was different for the two osteogenic media. We conclude that bone regeneration in critical size defects, as in our research, cannot be obtained without bone reconstruction.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

215-221

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] He Y, Zhang ZY, Zhu HG, Qiu W, Jiang X, Guo W, Experimental study on reconstruction of segmental mandible defects using tissue engineered bone combined bone marrow stromal cells with three dimensional tricalcium phosphate, J Craniofac Surg. 18(2007).

DOI: 10.1097/scs.0b013e31806901f5

Google Scholar

[2] Davo R, Malevez C, Rojas J, Immediate function in the atrophic maxilla using zygoma implants: a preliminary study, J Prosthet Dent. 97(2007)S44–S51.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(07)60007-9

Google Scholar

[3] Sjöström M, Sennerby L, Nilson H, Lundgren S, Reconstruction of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with free iliac crest grafts and implants: a 3-year report of a prospective clinical study, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 9(2007) 46–59.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2007.00034.x

Google Scholar

[4] Taylor GI, The current status of free vascularized bone grafts, Clin Plast Surg. 10(1983) 185–209.

Google Scholar

[5] Zhao J, Zhang Z, Wang S, Sun X, Zhang X, Chen J, Kaplan DL, Jiang X, Apatite-coated silk fibroin scaffolds to healing mandibular border defects in canines, Bone 45(2009) 517–527.

DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.05.026

Google Scholar

[6] Joshi A, An investigation of post-operative morbidity following graft surgery, Br Dent J. 196(2004) 215–218.

DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4810987

Google Scholar

[7] Clavero J, Lundgren S, Ramus or chin grafts for maxillary sinus inlay and local onlay augmentation: comparison of donor site morbidity and complications, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 5 (2003) 154–160.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00197.x

Google Scholar

[8] Crane GM, Ishaug SL, Mikos AG, Bone tissue engineering, Nat Med. 1(1995) 1322–1324.

DOI: 10.1038/nm1295-1322

Google Scholar

[9] Hollinger JO, Winn S, Bonadio J, Options for tissue engineering to address challenges of the agingSkeleton, Tissue Eng. 6(2000) 341–350.

DOI: 10.1089/107632700418065

Google Scholar

[10] Torroni A, Engineered bone grafts and bone flaps for maxillofacial defects: state of the art, J Oral Maxillofac Surg . 67(2009)1121–1127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.11.020

Google Scholar

[11] Lucaciu O, Băciuţ M, Băciuţ G, Câmpian R, Soriţău O, Bran S, Crişan B, Crişan L, Tissue engineered bone versus alloplastic commercial biomaterials in craniofacial reconstruction, Rom J Morphol Embryol. 51(2010) 129-36.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.695.215

Google Scholar

[12] Lucaciu O, Baciut M, Baciut M, Gheban D, Bran S, Hedesiu M, Nicola C, Soritau O, Gui D, Bone Regeneration in Craniofacial Reconstruction with Particulate Grafts obtained through Tissue Engineering , Particulate Sci Technol. 27(2009): 479-518.

DOI: 10.1080/02726350903328548

Google Scholar

[13] Lucaciu O, Gheban D, Soriţau O, Băciuţ M, Câmpian RS, Băciuţ G, Comparative assessment of bone regeneration by histometry and a histological scoring system, Rev Romana Med Lab. 23(2015): 31- 45.

DOI: 10.1515/rrlm-2015-0009

Google Scholar

[14] M Bastian, S Heymann, Gephi, An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks, gephi, org/publications/gephi-bastian-feb09. pdf.

DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v3i1.13937

Google Scholar

[15] ND Young et al, Whole-genome sequence of Schistosoma haematobium, Nature Genetics. 44(2012) 221-225.

Google Scholar

[16] T. Vanni,M. Fidas et al, International Scientific Collaboration in HIV and HPV: A Network Analysis, www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/pmc/articles/PMC3969316.

Google Scholar

[17] Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Jimi E, Osteoblasts/stromal cells stimulate osteoclast activation through expression of osteoclast differentiation factor/RANKL but not macrophage colonystimulating factor: receptor activator of NF-kappa B ligand, Bone. 25(1999).

DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(99)00210-0

Google Scholar

[18] Takami M, Woo JT, Nagai K, Osteoblastic cells induce fusion and activation of osteoclasts through a mechanism independent of macrophage-colony-stimulating factor production, Cell Tissue Res. 298(1999): 327-334.

DOI: 10.1007/s004419900092

Google Scholar

[19] Jensen ED, Pham L, Billington CJ Jr, Bone morphogenic protein 2 directly enhances differentiation of murine osteoclast precursors, J Cell Biochem. 109(2010) 672-682.

DOI: 10.1002/jcb.22462

Google Scholar

[20] Kaneko H, Arakawa T, Mano H, Direct stimulation ofosteoclastic bone resorption by bone morphogenetic protein(BMP)-2 and expression of BMP receptors in mature osteoclasts, Bone. 27(2000) 479-486.

DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00358-6

Google Scholar

[21] Tuominen T, Jamsa T, Tuukkanen J, Native bovine bone morphogenetic protein improves the potential of biocoral to heal segmental canine ulnar defects, Int Orthop. 24(2000) 289-294.

DOI: 10.1007/s002640000164

Google Scholar

[22] Barboza E, Caula A, Machado F, Potential of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in bone regeneration, Implant Dent. 8(1999) 360-367.

DOI: 10.1097/00008505-199904000-00006

Google Scholar

[23] Burdick JA, Frankel D, Dernell WS, Anseth KS, An initial investigation of photocurable three-dimensional lactic acid based scaffolds in a critical-sized cranial defect, Biomaterials. 24(2003) 1613-1620.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00538-0

Google Scholar