Proposal for a Short Patch Test Series of Dental Materials for Patients with Suspected Oral Contact Allergy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The selection of patch test haptens contained in oral rehabilitation materials is not an easy task, therefore baseline series and additional dental series are used for screening and to increase the chance for the detection of patient's contact sensitizations. Moreover, the clinical relevance of positive patch tests must be evaluated. We conducted a biomedical literature search, covering a period of thirty years, using the keywords: contact, allergy, dental, allergens, patch, patients, screening, in order to evaluate many studies including large numbers of patients, tested to various hapten series, in different departments, for the detection of the most common contact allergens involved in dental contact hypersensitivity. We propose a short patch test series of oral rehabilitation materials for patients including six metal haptens present in dental alloys for inlays, crowns, bridges and dentures, one monofunctional methacrylate and one epoxy prepolymer present in dental composite resins, dentin bonding agents and prosthetic materials, one epoxy resin type present in root canal sealants, three odorant constituents contained in provisional restorative and root canal filling materials, periodontal dressings and dental impression materials. Contact allergy to dental haptens is a constant studied subject, but the cost of patch testing with screening and additional or extensive series is relevant, therefore the proposal of a shorter dental material series for patients is aimed to promote sustainability of oral rehabilitation and contact hypersensitivity care and to reduce costs in some real-world settings.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

65-76

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.D. Johansen, K. Aalto-Korte, T. Agner, K.E. Andersen, A. Bircher, M. Bruze, A. Cannavó, A. Giménez-Arnau, M. Gonçalo, A. Goossens, S.M. John, C. Lidén, M. Lindberg, V. Mahler, M. Matura, T. Rustemeyer, J. Serup, R. Spiewak, J.P. Thyssen, M. Vigan, I.R. White, M. Wilkinson, W. Uter, European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice, Contact Dermatitis. 73 (2015).

DOI: 10.1111/cod.12432

Google Scholar

[2] P. Podmore, D. Burrows, E.A. Bingham, Prediction of patch test results, Contact Dermatitis. 11 (1984) 283 - 284.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1984.tb01010.x

Google Scholar

[3] S. Francalanci, S. Giorgini, L. Ricci, A. Sertoli, Patch testing by additional series of allergens: results of further experiences, Am. J. Contact. Dermat. 12 (2001) 203 - 207.

DOI: 10.1097/01206501-200112000-00004

Google Scholar

[4] A. Teik-Jin Goon, M. Bruze, E. Zimerson, C.L. Goh, M. Isaksson, Contact allergy to acrylates/methacrylates in the acrylate and nail acrylics series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens, Contact Dermatitis. 57 (2007).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01151.x

Google Scholar

[5] E. Czarnobilska, K. Lach, L. Odrzywolek, L. Sliwa, K. Obtulowicz, R. Spiewak, Detection of contact allergy: Using more extensive test series increases the diagnostic efficacy of patch tests, Przegl. Lek. 67 (2010) 103 - 106.

Google Scholar

[6] K. Canese, PubMed celebrates its 10th anniversary!, N.L.M. Tech. Bull. 352 (2006) e5.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Isaksson, Dental materials, in: J.D. Johansen et al. (Eds. ), Contact Dermatitis, Springer- Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp.763-791.

Google Scholar

[8] A.T.J. Goon , M.A.I. Isaksson, Hand eczema from acrylate compounds in dentistry, in: A. Alikhan et al. (Eds. ), Textbook of Hand Eczema, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014, pp.169-183.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39546-8_17

Google Scholar

[9] T.W. Kim, W.I. Kim, J.H. Mun, M. Song, H.S. Kim, B.S. Kim, M.B. Kim, H.C. Ko, Patch testing with dental screening series in oral disease, Ann Dermatol. 27 (2015) 389 - 393.

DOI: 10.5021/ad.2015.27.4.389

Google Scholar

[10] Z. Khamaysi, R. Bergman, S. Weltfriend, Positive patch test reactions to allergens of the dental series and the relation to the clinical presentations, Contact Dermatitis. 55 (2006) 216 - 218.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00905.x

Google Scholar

[11] E.A. Yontchev, Studies of individuals with orofacial discomfort complaints. An investigation of a group of patients who related their sufferings to effects of dental materials and constructions, Swed. Dent. J. Suppl. 38 (1986) 1 - 45.

Google Scholar

[12] T. van Joost, J. van Ulsen, L.A. van Loon, Contact allergy to denture materials in the burning mouth syndrome, Contact Dermatitis. 18 (1988) 97 - 99.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1988.tb02748.x

Google Scholar

[13] R.O. Dutrée-Meulenberg, M.M. Kozel, T. van Joost, Burning mouth syndrome: a possible etiologic role for local contact hypersensitivity, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 26 (1992) 935 - 940.

DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70136-4

Google Scholar

[14] J. Helton, F. Storrs, The burning mouth syndrome: lack of a role for contact urticaria and contact dermatitis, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 31 (1994) 201 - 205.

DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(94)70146-6

Google Scholar

[15] M. Gebhart, J. Geier, Evaluation of patch test results with denture material series, Contact Dermatitis. 34 (1996) 191 - 195.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02172.x

Google Scholar

[16] R. Marino, P. Capaccio, L. Pignataro, F. Spadari, Burning mouth syndrome: the role of contact hypersensitivity, Oral Dis. 15 (2009) 255 - 258.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01515.x

Google Scholar

[17] P.D. Pigatto, G. Guzzi, P. Persichini, S. Barbadillo, Recovery from mercury-induced burning mouth syndrome due to mercury allergy, Dermatitis. 15 (2004) 75 - 77.

DOI: 10.2310/6620.2004.03021

Google Scholar

[18] P. Koch, F.A. Bahmer, Oral lichenoid lesions, mercury hypersensitivity and combined hypersensitivity to mercury and other metals: histologically-proven reproduction of the reaction by patch testing with metal salts, Contact Dermatitis. 33 (1995).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1995.tb02046.x

Google Scholar

[19] J.A. Yiannias, R.A. el-Azhary, J.H. Hand, S.Y. Pakzad, R.S. Rogers 3rd, Relevant contact sensitivities in patients with the diagnosis of oral lichen planus, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 42 (2000) 177 - 182.

DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(00)90123-3

Google Scholar

[20] L. Wong, S. Freeman, Oral lichenoid lesions (OLL) and mercury in amalgam fillings, Contact Dermatitis. 48 (2003) 74 - 79.

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.480204.x

Google Scholar

[21] L.A. Garner, Contact dermatitis to metals, Dermatol. Ther. 17 (2004) 321 - 327.

Google Scholar

[22] M. Mehulić, K. Mehulić, P. Kos, D. Komar, M. Katunarić, Expression of contact allergy in undergoing prosthodontic therapy patients with oral diseases, Minerva Stomatol. 54 (2005) 303 - 309.

Google Scholar

[23] M.A. Lomaga, S. Polak, M. Grushka, S. Walsh, Results of patch testing in patients diagnosed with oral lichen planus, J. Cutan. Med. Surg. 13 (2009) 88-95.

DOI: 10.2310/7750.2008.08017

Google Scholar

[24] D. Koutis, S. Freeman, Allergic contact stomatitis caused by acrylic monomer in a denture, Australas. J. Dermatol. 42 (2001) 203 - 206.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-0960.2001.00517.x

Google Scholar

[25] S. Freeman, R. Stephens, Cheilitis: analysis of 75 cases referred to a contact dermatitis clinic, Am. J. Contact. Dermat. 10 (1999) 198-200.

DOI: 10.1097/01206501-199912000-00003

Google Scholar

[26] D. Schena, F. Fantuzzi, G. Girolomoni, Contact allergy in chronic eczematous lip dermatitis, Eur. J. Dermatol. 18 (2008) 688 - 692.

Google Scholar

[27] Y. Lavy, D. Slodownik, A. Trattner, A. Ingber, Toothpaste allergy as a cause of cheilitis in Israeli patients, Dermatitis. 20 (2009) 95 - 98.

DOI: 10.2310/6620.2009.08058

Google Scholar

[28] M. Tomka, A. Machovcová, D. Pelclová, J. Petanová, M. Arenbergerová, J. Procházková, Orofacial granulomatosis associated with hypersensitivity to dental amalgam, Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. Endod. 112 (2011) 335 - 341.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.030

Google Scholar

[29] G. Richter, J. Geier, Dental materials-problem substances in allergologic diagnosis? I: Analysis of test results in patients with mouth mucosa/dental material problems, Hautarzt. 47 (1996) 839 - 843.

Google Scholar

[30] A. Schnuch, W. Uter, J. Geier, P.J. Frosch, T. Rustemeyer, Contact allergies in healthcare workers. Results from the IVDK, Acta Derm Venereol. 78 (1998) 358 - 363.

DOI: 10.1080/000155598443060

Google Scholar

[31] A. Ehrlich, D.V. Belsito, Allergic contact dermatitis to gold, Cutis. 65 (2000) 323 - 326.

Google Scholar

[32] D. Wray, S.R. Rees, J. Gibson, A. Forsyth, The role of allergy in oral mucosal diseases, Q.J.M. 93 (2000) 507 - 511.

Google Scholar

[33] L. Kanerva, T. Rantanen, K. Aalto-Korte, T. Estlander, M. Hannuksela, R.J. Harvima, T. Hasan, M. Horsmanheimo, R. Jolanki, K. Kalimo, A. Lahti, K. Lammintausta, A. Lauerma, A. Niinimäki, K. Turjanmaa, A.M. Vuorela, A multicenter study of patch test reactions with dental screening series, Am. J. Contact. Dermat. 12 (2001).

DOI: 10.1097/01206501-200106000-00004

Google Scholar

[34] M. Hosoki, E. Bando, K. Asaoka, H. Takeuchi, K. Nishigawa, Assessment of allergic hypersensitivity to dental materials, Biomed. Mater. Eng. 19 (2009) 53 - 61.

DOI: 10.3233/bme-2009-0563

Google Scholar

[35] U. Raap, M. Stiesch, H. Reh, A. Kapp, T. Werfel, Investigation of contact allergy to dental metals in 206 patients, Contact Dermatitis. 60 (2009) 339 - 343.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01524.x

Google Scholar

[36] R.R. Torgerson, M.D. Davis, A.J. Bruce, S.A. Farmer, R.S. Rogers 3rd, Contact allergy in oral disease, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 57 (2007) 315 - 321.

Google Scholar

[37] D. Ditrichova, S. Kapralova, M. Tichy, V. Ticha, J. Dobesova, E. Justova, M. Eber, P. Pirek, Oral lichenoid lesions and allergy to dental materials, Biomed. Pap. Med. Fac. Univ. Palacky Olomouc. Czech Repub. 151 (2007) 333 - 339.

DOI: 10.5507/bp.2007.057

Google Scholar

[38] P.C. Schalock, J.P. Thyssen, Metal hypersensitivity reactions to implants: opinions and practices of patch testing dermatologists, Dermatitis. 24 (2013) 313 - 320.

DOI: 10.1097/der.0b013e3182a67d90

Google Scholar

[39] A. Bakula, L. Lugović-Mihić, M. Situm, J. Turcin, A. Sinković, Contact allergy in the mouth: diversity of clinical presentations and diagnosis of common allergens relevant to dental practice, Acta Clin. Croat. 50 (2011) 553 - 561.

Google Scholar

[40] J. Muris, A. Goossens, M. Gonçalo, A.J. Bircher, A. Giménez-Arnau, C. Foti, M. Bruze, K.E. Andersen, T. Rustemeyer, A.J. Feilzer, C.J. Kleverlaan, Sensitization to palladium in Europe, Contact Dermatitis. 72 (2015) 11 - 19.

DOI: 10.1111/cod.12295

Google Scholar

[41] A.T. Goon, M. Isaksson, E. Zimerson, C.L. Goh, M. Bruze, Contact allergy to (meth)acrylates in the dental series in southern Sweden: simultaneous positive patch test reaction patterns and possible screening allergens, Contact Dermatitis. 55 (2006).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00922.x

Google Scholar

[42] K. Aalto-Korte, K. Alanko, O. Kuuliala, R. Jolanki, Methacrylate and acrylate allergy in dental personnel, Contact Dermatitis. 57 (2007) 324 - 330.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01237.x

Google Scholar

[43] A.M. Drucker, M.D. Pratt, Acrylate contact allergy: patient characteristics and evaluation of screening allergens, Dermatitis. 22 (2011) 98-101.

DOI: 10.2310/6620.2011.10093

Google Scholar

[44] L. Ramos, R. M. Cabral Gonçalo, Allergic contact dermatitis caused by acrylates and methacrylates - a 7-year study, Contact Dermatitis. 71 (2014) 102 -107.

DOI: 10.1111/cod.12266

Google Scholar

[45] L. Fonacier, D.I. Bernstein, K. Pacheco, D.L. Holness, J. Blessing-Moore, D. Khan, D. Lang, R. Nicklas, J. Oppenheimer, J. Portnoy, C. Randolph, D. Schuller, S. Spector, S. Tilles, D. Wallace, Contact dermatitis: a practice parameter - update 2015, J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 3 (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.02.009

Google Scholar

[46] Y. Issa, A.J. Duxbury, T.V. Macfarlane, P.A. Brunton, Oral lichenoid lesions related to dental restorative materials, Br. Dental J. 198 (2005) 361 - 366.

DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4812176

Google Scholar

[47] D. Ditrichova, S. Kapralova, M. Tichy, V. Ticha, J. Dobesov, Oral lichenoid lesions and allergy to dental material, Biomed. 151 (2007) 333 - 339.

DOI: 10.5507/bp.2007.057

Google Scholar

[48] R. Sharma, S. Handa, D. De, B.D. Radotra, V. Rattan, Role of dental restoration materials in oral mucosal lichenoid lesions, Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 81 (2015) 478 - 484.

DOI: 10.4103/0378-6323.162341

Google Scholar

[49] I. Al-Hashimi, M. Schifter, P.B. Lockhart, D. Wray, M. Brennan, C.A. Migliorati, T. Axéll, A.J. Bruce, W. Carpenter, E. Eisenberg, J.B. Epstein, P. Holmstrup, M. Jontell, F. Lozada-Nur, R. Nair, B. Silverman, K. Thongprasom, M. Thornhill, S. Warnakulasuriya, I. van der Waal, Oral lichen planus and oral lichenoid lesions: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations, Oral Surg. Oral. Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 103 (2007).

DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2006.11.001

Google Scholar

[50] J. Muris, C.J. Kleverlaan, T. Rustemeyer, M.E. von Blomberg, I.M. van Hoogstraten, A.J. Feilzer, R.J. Scheper, Sodium tetrachloropalladate for diagnosing palladium sensitization, Contact Dermatitis. 67 (2012) 94-100.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02061.x

Google Scholar

[51] F.D. Popescu, S.M. Popescu, F, Popescu, Hypersensitivity to palladium in patients with allergic contact dermatitis to nickel needing prostethic restorations. in: C.E. Lupusoru, L. Tartau (Eds. ), Adverse effects of pharmacologic active substances: from bench to bedside, Iasi, Junimea Publishing House, 2009, pp.63-69.

Google Scholar

[52] F.D. Popescu, S.M. Popescu, M. Burlibasa, Platinum group metals as contact allergens in oral rehabilitation, Metalurgia International. 15 (2010) 12 - 18.

Google Scholar

[53] J.C. Wataha, R.L. Messer, Casting alloys, Dent. Clin. North. Am. 48 (2004) 499-512.

Google Scholar

[54] J.C. Wataha, J.L. Drury, W.O. Chung, Nickel alloys in the oral environment, Expert. Rev. Med. Devices. 10 (2013) 519 - 539.

DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2013.811868

Google Scholar

[55] J.F. López-Alías, J. Martinez-Gomis, J.M. Anglada, M. Peraire, Ion release from dental casting alloys as assessed by a continuous flow system: Nutritional and toxicological implications, Dent. Mater. 22 (2006) 832 - 837.

DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2005.11.011

Google Scholar

[56] W. Elshahawy , I. Watanabe, Biocompatibility of dental alloys used in dental fixed prosthodontics, Tanta Dental Journal. 11 (2014) 150 - 159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tdj.2014.07.005

Google Scholar

[57] M. Stark, Y. Lerman, A. Kapel, A. Pardo, Y. Schwarz, L. Newman, L. Maier, E. Fireman, Biological exposure metrics of beryllium-exposed dental technicians, Arch. Environ. Occup. Health. 69 (2014) 89 - 99.

DOI: 10.1080/19338244.2012.744736

Google Scholar

[58] P. Turić, J. Lipozencić, V. Milavec-Puretić, S.M. Kulisić, Contact allergy caused by fragrance mix and Myroxylon pereirae (balsam of Peru) - a retrospective study, Coll. Antropol. 35 (2011) 83 - 87.

Google Scholar

[59] B.M. Hausen, Contact allergy to balsam of Peru. II. Patch test results in 102 patients with selected balsam of Peru constituents, Am. J. Contact Dermat. 12 (2001) 93 - 102.

DOI: 10.1097/01206501-200106000-00006

Google Scholar