Effect of Particle Size Distribution of Raw Materials on Properties of Magnesia-Alumina Refractory

Article Preview

Abstract:

Starting from different sizes of magnesia and bauxitewith sodium hexametaphosphate as anchoring agent, specimens obtained by suppression were sintered at 1500°C and 1550°C and heat preservation for 3h in the electric hearth furnace, respectively. The effect of particle size distribution of magnesia and bauxite on the properties of magnesia-alumina refractory materials was investigated. The composition of magnesia-alumina refractory which consists of various particle size distributions was determined, according to Andreasen packing model, with distribution coefficient (q) of 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40 and 0.50. The fractographs of the specimen were observed by scanning electron microscopy. The linear rate of change, apparent porosity, bulk density and crushing strength of these specimens were studied. The results showed: a crushing strength of 52.39 MPa, an apparent porosity value of 15.55% and a bulk density value of 2.91 g/cm3 were obtained via a particle size distribution coefficient of 0.30 at 1550°C. Simultaneously, the refractory materials had small linear rate of change.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

595-598

Citation:

Online since:

July 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K.Q. Liu, J. Naihuo Cailiao (Refractory, Chinese version) 40 (2006) 177-181.

Google Scholar

[2] P.W. Zhang, X.C. Li, B.Q. Zhu, J. Chin. Refract. 3 (2013) 28-31.

Google Scholar

[3] H.X. Li, Refractory application manual, first ed., Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] Z.D. Wang, K.J. Cao, J.Y. He. Induction Furnace Smelting, first ed., Chemical Industry Press, Beijing, 2007, pp.50-52.

Google Scholar

[5] J.J. Li, Y.L. Xie, J. Non-metal. Miner. 4 (1996) 3.

Google Scholar

[6] N. Li, H.Z. Gu, H.Z. Zhao, Refractory Materials, first ed., Metallurgical Industry Press, Beijing, 2010, pp.185-197.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Cemail, R. Brian, R. Frank, P. D. Warren, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 22 (2002) 745–754.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Kiennemann, E. Chabas, C. Ulrich, China's Refract. 24 (2015) 63-68.

Google Scholar

[9] Y.K. Kalpakli, Arch. Mater. Sci. Eng. 34 (2008) 81-88.

Google Scholar

[10] D.R. Dinger, J.E. Funk, Interceram 41 (1992) 95-97.

Google Scholar

[11] H.B. Liu, J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 19 (1991) 164-172.

Google Scholar

[12] R.N. Lumley, G.B. Schaffer, Scripta mater. 39 (1998) 1089-1094.

Google Scholar

[13] D.R. Dinger, J.E. Funk, Interceram 41 (1992) 332-334.

Google Scholar

[14] I.I. Nemets, V.V. Strokova, V. Zubashchenko, Indust. Ceram. 45 (2004) 214-216.

Google Scholar