The Effect of Thickness on the Fracture Strength and Failure Modes of Zirconia Crowns

Article Preview

Abstract:

To explore the effect of thickness on the fracture strength and failure modes of zirconia crowns, four crown models with different thickness (1.2 mm, 1.0 mm, 0.8 mm, 0.6 mm) with the same shape were designed by Dental Designer software in CAD/CAM system. They were manufactured to 40 zirconia crowns by CAM carving machine. The fracture strength and the failure modes of each crown was measured, while porcelain fused to metal (PFM) crowns as control. The average fracture strength of different zirconia crowns were recorded as below: 1308.38 ± 111.38 N (Group 0.6 mm), 1841.60 ± 68.21 N (Group 0.8 mm), 2429.88 ± 315.03 N (Group 1.0 mm), 3068.31 ± 233.88 N (Group 1.2 mm). There was no significant difference between Group 1.0 mm and Group 1.2 mm (P > 0.05), and statistical significance was obtained among every other two groups (P < 0.05). The failure modes of different thickness zirconium crowns are similar. There are more broken pieces from thicker crowns compared to thinner ones. It is concluded that the thickness can influence the fracture strength of zirconia crown. With the increase of the thickness, the fracture strength of the zirconium crowns also increases. We recommend zirconia crowns thicker than or at least 1.0 mm in dental practice.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

629-632

Citation:

Online since:

July 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Palinkas M, Nassar MS, Cecflio FA, et a1. Age and gender influence on maximal bite force and masticatory muscles thickness. Arch Oral Biol, 2010, 55(10): 797-802.

DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2010.06.016

Google Scholar

[2] Varga S, Spalj S, Lapter Varga M, et a1. Maximum voluntary molar bite force in subjects with normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod, 2011, 33(4): 427-33.

DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq097

Google Scholar

[3] Donovan TE. Porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) alternatives. J Esthet Restor Dent, 2009, 21 (1): 4-6.

Google Scholar

[4] Hui Wang, Jihua Chen, Changxi Shi. The effect of thickness on the fracture resistance of hot pressable ceramic crowns. J Practical Dent, 2003, 9(3): 263-265.

Google Scholar

[5] Kim JH, Park JH, Park YB, et a1. Fracture load of zirconia crowns according to the thickness and marginal design of coping. J Prosthet Dent, 2012, 108(2): 96-101.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(12)60114-0

Google Scholar

[6] Jang GW, Kim HS, Choe HC, et a1. Fracture strength and mechanism of dental ceramic crown with zirconia thickness. Procedia Engineering, 2011 (10): 1556-1560.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2011.04.260

Google Scholar