Electrophoretic Deposition of PEEK/45S5 Bioactive Glass Coating on Porous Titanium Substrate: Influence of Processing Conditions and Porosity Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

Commercially pure titanium (cp Ti) is typically accepted as one of the best in vitro and in vivo bone replacement biomaterial, due to its excellent balance between biomechanical and biofunctional properties. In that context, the aim of this work is to prove the hypothesis of a simultaneous solution to certain specific limitations of cpTi, which can often compromise the reliability of implants: (i) stress-shielding phenomenon, and (ii) a deficient biointerface with bone, which reduces the osseointegration. Porous samples of cp Ti, grade IV, were obtained by space-holder technique (50 vol.% NH4HCO3, 800 MPa, at 1250 oC during 2h, under high vacuum), to produce a good balance between Young ́s Modulus and yield strength. Different types of porous samples were manufactured by considering different size particles ranges of NH4HCO3: 100-200μm, 250-355μm and 355-500μm. Afterwards, they were coated with a PEEK/45S5 bioactive glass composite by electrophoretic deposition, to be finally sintered at 350oC for 1h. The coatings homogeneity, infiltration efficiency, adhesion and cracking, were studied in order to establish correlations with processing conditions (time of deposition, applied voltage, composition, concentration and stability of the colloidal suspension). Detailed structural characterization of the coatings was performed (SEM and XRD), besides the contact angle and contact profilometry testing. Additional mechanical and chemical insights were achieved by evaluating both the tribo-mechanical (instrumented microindentation and micro-scratch testing) and electrochemical behaviors (potentiodynamic polarization and in vitro corrosion tests in SBF). All these results allowed us to determine the optimal balance of properties for a porous substrate (space holder of 250-355μm) with a coating obtained for 65 V, 2 min, 6 mm (distance between electrodes), 10 g/L bioactive glass and 20 g/l PEEK. The high adhesion estimated between the bioactive/biopolymer coatings and the porous titanium substrates (excellent infiltration) suggest that this new biocomposite is a good candidate for load-bearing applications.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

343-350

Citation:

Online since:

August 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D. F. Williams, On the mechanisms of biocompatibility, Biomaterials 29 (2008) 2941–2953.

Google Scholar

[2] D. R. Sumner, J. O. Galante, Determinants of stress shielding: design versus materials versus interface, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 274 (1992) 202–212.

DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199201000-00020

Google Scholar

[3] Information on http: /www. njrcentre. org. uk.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Torres, J. J. Pavón, I. Nieto, J. A. Rodríguez, Conventional Powder Metallurgy Process and Characterization of Porous Titanium for Biomedical Applications, Metall and Materi Trans B 42 (2011) 891–900.

DOI: 10.1007/s11663-011-9521-6

Google Scholar

[5] I. -H. Oh, N. Nomura, N. Masahashi, S. Hanada, Mechanical properties of porous titanium compacts prepared by powder sintering, Scripta Materialia 49 (2003) 1197–1202.

DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2003.08.018

Google Scholar

[6] J. Parthasarathy, B. Starly, S. Raman, A. Christensen, Mechanical evaluation of porous titanium (Ti6Al4V) structures with electron beam melting (EBM), J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 3 (2010) 249–259.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.10.006

Google Scholar

[7] J. P. Li, J. R. de Wijn, C. A. Van Blitterswijk, K. de Groot, Porous Ti6Al4V scaffold directly fabricating by rapid prototyping: Preparation and in vitro experiment, Biomaterials 27 (2006) 1223–1235.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.08.033

Google Scholar

[8] C. E. Wen, M. Mabuchi, Y. Yamada, K. Shimojima, Y. Chino, T. Asahina, Processing of biocompatible porous Ti and Mg, Scripta Materialia 45 (2001) 1147–1153.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(01)01132-0

Google Scholar

[9] V. Goriainov, R. Cook, J. M. Latham, D. G. Dunlop, R. O. C. Oreffo, Bone and metal: An orthopaedic perspective on osseointegration of metals, Acta Biomaterialia 10 (2014) 4043–4057.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.06.004

Google Scholar

[10] A. R. Boccaccini, S. Keim, R. Ma, Y. Li, I. Zhitomirsky, Electrophoretic deposition of biomaterials, Journal of The Royal Society Interface 7 (2010) S581–S613.

DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2010.0156.focus

Google Scholar

[11] L. L. Hench, Bioceramics: From Concept to Clinic, Journal of the American Ceramic Society 74 (1991) 1487–1510.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1991.tb07132.x

Google Scholar

[12] Chen, Q., Cordero-Arias, L., Roether, J. A., Cabanas-Polo, S., Virtanen, S., Boccaccini, A. R., Alginate/Bioglass (R) composite coatings on stainless steel deposited by direct current and alternating current electrophoretic deposition. Surface and Coatings Technology 233 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.01.042

Google Scholar

[13] F. Pishbin, A. Simchi, M. P. Ryan, A. R. Boccaccini, Electrophoretic deposition of chitosan/45S5 Bioglass® composite coatings for orthopaedic applications, Surface and Coatings Technology 205 (2011) 5260–5268.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.05.026

Google Scholar

[14] T. Moskalewicz, S. Seuss, A. R. Boccaccini, Microstructure and properties of composite polyetheretherketone/Bioglass® coatings deposited on Ti–6Al–7Nb alloy for medical applications, Applied Surface Science 273 (2013) 62–67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.174

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Torres, J. A. Rodríguez, S. Arias, M. Echeverry, S. Robledo, V. Amigo, J. J. Pavón, Processing, characterization and biological testing of porous titanium obtained by space-holder technique, Journal of Materials Science 47 (2012) 6565–6576.

DOI: 10.1007/s10853-012-6586-9

Google Scholar

[16] ASTM F67-13, Standard Specification for Unalloyed Titanium, for Surgical Implant Applications (UNS R50250, UNS R50400, UNS R50550, UNS R50700), (2013) ASTM International.

DOI: 10.1520/f0067

Google Scholar

[17] J. Currey, in: Black JH, Garth (eds), Handbook of Biomaterials Properties. Springer, London, (1998).

Google Scholar

[18] J. Black, G. Hastings, Handbook of Biomaterials Properties, Chapman and Hall, London, (1998).

Google Scholar

[19] G. Ryan, A. Pandit, and D.P. Apatsidis, Biomaterials 27 (13) (2006) 2651–2670.

Google Scholar

[20] ASTM B962-15, Standard Test Methods for Density of Compacted or Sintered Powder Metallurgy (PM) Products Using Archimedes' Principle, (2015) ASTM International.

DOI: 10.1520/b0962-15

Google Scholar

[21] ASTM E9-09, Standard Test Methods of Compression Testing of Metallic Materials at Room Temperature, (2009) ASTM International.

Google Scholar

[22] T. Moskalewicz, S. Seuss & A.R. Boccaccini, Microstructure and properties of composite polyetheretherketone/Bioglass® coatings deposited on Ti–6Al–7Nb alloy for medical applications, Applied Surface Science 273 (2013) 62–67.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.01.174

Google Scholar

[23] ASTM C1624-05(2015), Standard Test Method for Adhesion Strength and Mechanical Failure Modes of Ceramic Coatings by Quantitative Single Point Scratch Testing, (2015) ASTM International.

DOI: 10.1520/c1624-05r15

Google Scholar

[24] S. Borjas, E. J. Gil, L. Cordero, J.J. Pavón, J.A. Rodríguez, A.R. Boccaccini, Y. Torres, Electrophoretic Deposition and Characterization of Chitosan/45S5 Bioactive Glass Composite Coatings on Porous Titanium for Biomedical Applications, Key Engineering Materials 654 (2015).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.654.189

Google Scholar

[25] A. C. Jones, C. H. Arns, D. W. Hutmacher, B. K. Milthorpe, A. P. Sheppard , M. A. Knackstedt, The correlation of pore morphology, interconnectivity and physical properties of 3D ceramic scaffolds with bone ingrowth, Biomaterials 30 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.10.056

Google Scholar

[26] E. A. Vogler, Structure and reactivity of water at biomaterial surfaces, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 74 (1998) 69-117.

DOI: 10.1016/s0001-8686(97)00040-7

Google Scholar

[27] G. Welsch, R. Boyer, E. W. Collings, Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys. ASM International, (1993).

Google Scholar

[28] J. R. Jones, Reprint of: Review of bioactive glass: From Hench to hybrids, Acta Biomaterialia 23 (2015) S53–S82.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.07.019

Google Scholar

[29] S. Lopez-Esteban, E. Saiz, S. Fujino, T. Oku, K. Suganuma, A. P. Tomsia, Bioactive glass coatings for orthopedic metallic implants, Journal of the European Ceramic Society 23 (2003) 2921–2930.

DOI: 10.1016/s0955-2219(03)00303-0

Google Scholar

[30] J. E. Mark, Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook, Springer New York, New York, (2007).

Google Scholar