Sustainability, Durability and Structural Advantages as Leverage in Promoting Aluminium Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

Light weight as a primary factor in combination with strength and durability properties of aluminium alloys brings financial benefits accruing not only from material procurement but along the whole chain of production, manufacturing, delivery and installation, maintenance and even disposal. A significant contribution in the quest to deliver more value has been the development in the last decade of harmonized design and execution standards, the Eurocodes, National Annexes and adapted codes or recommendations for specific applications. The sustainability issue can be dealt with in a more reliable way due to the comprehensive data tools and comparative analyses available nowadays. Experience with growing numbers of applications also delivers benchmark values for initial cost and maintenance requirements.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

13-21

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Kosteas, Aluminium Footbridges, Structures Lean in Weight and Life Cycle Cost, 5th Int´l Conf. Footbridge 2014, Imperial College, London, (2014).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Stacey, Aluminium: Flexible and Light - Towards Sustainable Cities, chapter Light and Strong: Bridges, pp.294-399, Cwningen Press, Llundain, (forthcoming) (2016).

Google Scholar

[3] D. Kosteas, Corrosion and Surface Protection on Aluminium Structures, A Glück GmbH internal unpublished compilation of measures in practice, November (2014).

Google Scholar

[4] D. Kosteas and C. Radlbeck, Konstruieren mit Aluminium (Constructing with Aluminium), in: U. Kuhlmann (Ed. ), Ernst & Sohn, Berlin, (2007).

DOI: 10.1002/9783433600733.ch4

Google Scholar

[5] C. Radlbeck and D. Kosteas, Sustainability of Aluminium as a Building Material, Proc. 9th INALCO, Cleveland, Ohio, pp.21-1 to 9, (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] C. Radlbeck, Ganzheitliche Analyse und Bewertung von tragenden Aluminiumkonstru-ktionen (Comprehensive Analysis and Evaluation of Aluminium Structures), PdD Thesis, Technical University Munich, (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] C. Radlbeck, E. Dienes and D. Kosteas, Sustainability of Aluminium in Buildings, Structural Engineering International, vol. 14 (2004), no. 3, pp.221-224.

DOI: 10.2749/101686604777963838

Google Scholar

[8] E. Dienes, C. Radlbeck and D. Kosteas, Sustainability by LCCA of Aluminium Structures, in: Final Conference Proceedings Improvement of Buildings` Structural Quality by New Technologies - COST 12, Innsbruck, 20. -22. Jan. 2005, pp.547-554.

DOI: 10.1201/9780203970843.ch63

Google Scholar

[9] C. Radlbeck, E. Dienes and D. Kosteas, Sustainable Competitiveness of Aluminium Building Products, in: Structural Survey, Vol. 23, No. 2, 2005, pp.131-137.

DOI: 10.1108/02630800510593693

Google Scholar

[10] C. Radlbeck, D. Kosteas and M. Schlinz, Aluminium – A Sustainable Building Material.

Google Scholar

[11] Bavarian Research Network for Recycling and Waste Managemen (BayFORREST) - Internet-based Simulation of Resource Requirements for Structures, Research Project F219, Lehr-stuhl für Bauinformatik, Techn. Univ. München, (2003).

Google Scholar

[12] Private correspondence M. Pygott/Carillion UK, Doncaster Station Footbridge project, 03. 11. (2015).

Google Scholar