Design and Analysis of Automotive Bumper Covers in Transient Loading Conditions

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents the analysis methods for design of automotive bumper covers. The bumper covers are plastic structures attached to the front and rear ends of an automobile and are expected to absorb energy in a minor collision. One requirement in design of the bumper covers is to minimize the bumper deflection within a limited range under specific loadings at specific locations based on the design guideline. To investigate the stiffness performance under various loading conditions, a numerical model based on the explicit dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) using the commercial FEA solver, LS-DYNA, is developed to analyze the design. The experimental tests are also carried out to verify the numerical model. The thickness of the bumper cover is a design variable which usually varies from 3 to 4 mm depending on locations. To improve the stiffness of the bumper, an optimal design for the bumper under a pre-defined loading condition is identified by using the topology optimization approach, which is an optimal design method to obtain the optimal layout of an initial design domain under specific boundary conditions. The outcome of this study provides an efficient and cost-effective method to predict and improve the design of automotive bumper covers.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

174-179

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Matsui, Effects of vehicle bumper height and impact velocity on type of lower extremity injury in vehicle–pedestrian accidents, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37: 4 (2005) 633-640.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2005.03.005

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Matsui, M. Hitosugi, K. Mizuno, Severity of vehicle bumper location in vehicle-to-pedestrian impact accidents, Forensic Science International, 212: 1–3 (2011) 205-209.

DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.06.012

Google Scholar

[3] E.M. Ossiander, T.D. Koepsell, B. McKnight, Will the light truck bumper height-matching standard reduce deaths in cars?, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 51 (2013) 292-300.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.004

Google Scholar

[4] M.M. Davoodi, S.M. Sapuan, A. Aidy, N.A. Abu Osman, A.A. Oshkour, W.A.B. Wan Abas, Development process of new bumper beam for passenger car: A review, Materials & Design, 40 (2012) 304-313.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.03.060

Google Scholar

[5] G. Belingardi, A.T. Beyene, E.G. Koricho, B. Martorana, Alternative lightweight materials and component manufacturing technologies for vehicle frontal bumper beam, Composite Structures, 120 (2015) 483-495.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.10.007

Google Scholar

[6] D. -H. Kim, H. -G. Kim, H. -S. Kim, Design optimization and manufacture of hybrid glass/carbon fiber reinforced composite bumper beam for automobile vehicle, Composite Structures, 131 (2015) 742-752.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2015.06.028

Google Scholar

[7] Z.Q. Cheng, J.G. Thacker, W.D. Pilkey, W.T. Hollowell, S.W. Reagan, E.M. Sieveka, Experiences in reverse-engineering of a finite element automobile crash model, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 37: 11 (2001) 843-860.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-874x(01)00071-3

Google Scholar

[8] G.R. Consolazio, J.H. Chung, K.R. Gurley, Impact simulation and full scale crash testing of a low profile concrete work zone barrier, Computers & Structures, 81: 13 (2003) 1359-1374.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(03)00058-0

Google Scholar

[9] L. Kwasniewski, C. Bojanowski, J. Siervogel, J.W. Wekezer, K. Cichocki, Crash and safety assessment program for paratransit buses, International Journal of Impact Engineering, 36: 2 (2009) 235-242.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.05.003

Google Scholar

[10] N. Li, H. Fang, C. Zhang, M. Gutowski, E. Palta, Q. Wang, A numerical study of occupant responses and injuries in vehicular crashes into roadside barriers based on finite element simulations, Advances in Engineering Software, 90 (2015) 22-40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.06.004

Google Scholar

[11] C. -H. Liu, and K. -M. Lee, Dynamic modeling of damping effects in highly damped compliant fingers for applications involving contacts, ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 134 (2012) 011005-1-9.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4005270

Google Scholar

[12] K. -M. Lee, C. -H. Liu, Explicit dynamic finite element analysis of an automated grasping process using highly damped compliant fingers, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 64: 5 (2012) 965-977.

DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.02.033

Google Scholar

[13] C. -H. Liu, W. Chen, W. Su, C. -N. Sun, Numerical and experimental analysis of the automated demolding process for PDMS microfluidic devices with high-aspect ratio micropillars, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 80: 1 (2015).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-6959-8

Google Scholar

[14] R.R. Magalhaes, C.H.O. Fontes, S.A.B. Vieira de Melo, Stress analysis of a front bumper fascia using the boundary element method, Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 36: 8 (2012) 1296-1300.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2012.02.008

Google Scholar

[15] H.A. Eschenauer, N. Olhoff, Topology optimization of continuum structures: a review, ASME Applied Mechanics Reviews, 54: 4 (2001) 331-390.

DOI: 10.1115/1.1388075

Google Scholar

[16] G.I.N. Rozvany, Stress ratio and compliance based methods in topology optimization - a critical review, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 21: 2 (2001) 109-119.

DOI: 10.1007/s001580050175

Google Scholar

[17] G.I.N. Rozvany, A critical review of established methods of structural topology optimization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 37: 3 (2009) 217-237.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-007-0217-0

Google Scholar

[18] O. Sigmund, K. Maute, Topology optimization approaches, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 48(6) (2013) 1031-1055.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6

Google Scholar

[19] C. -H. Liu, G. -F. Huang, A topology optimization method with constant volume fraction during iterations for design of compliant mechanisms, ASME Journal of Mechanisms and Robotics, 8: 4 (2016) 044505-1-7.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4032812

Google Scholar

[20] M. Cavazzuti, A. Baldini, E. Bertocchi, D. Costi, E. Torricelli, P. Moruzzi, High performance automotive chassis design: a topology optimization based approach, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 44: 1 (2011), 45-56.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-010-0578-7

Google Scholar

[21] C. Li, I.Y. Kim, J. Jeswiet, Conceptual and detailed design of an automotive engine cradle by using topology, shape, and size optimization, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 51: 2 (2015) 547-564.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-014-1151-6

Google Scholar