Interior Head Impact Analysis of Automotive Instrument Panel for Unrestrained Front Seat Passengers

Abstract:

This study presents the numerical and experimental interior head impact analysis of automotive instrument panel according to the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation 21 (ECE R21). To minimize the possible injury risk for unrestrained front seat passengers due to the interior head impact with the instrument panel, the panel design needs to meet the ECE R21 standard which defines a pendulum-type head form as the impactor. The measured acceleration response of the head form should not exceed 80g continuously for more than 3ms. Motivated by the need to develop a simulation-based technique to evaluate the design of the instrument panel, a numerical model based on the explicit dynamic finite element analysis (FEA) by using the commercial FEA solver, LS-DYNA, is developed. To minimize the experimental cost, a gravity-based impactor with a smaller impact speed is develop as the test apparatus for verification purpose. The simulated results agree well with the experimental data; the average accuracy for the maximum value of impact acceleration at the head form is 95.4%. After the verification, the standard test conditions (with higher impact speed) are performed to evaluate the design. The outcome of this study can provide an efficient and cost-effective method to predict and improve the design of the instrument panel for interior head impact protection.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 715)
• Pages: 186-191
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.715.186
• Online since: September 2016
• Authors: Chih Hsing Liu*, Yu Cheng Lai, Chen Hua Chiu, Meng Hsien Lin
• Keywords: Finite Element Analysis, Head Impact, Instrument Panel, Occupant Protection

References

[1] United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Regulation No. 21, Uniform provisions concerning the approval of vehicles with regard to their interior fittings, (2003).

[2] R. Mullen, T. Belytschko, An analysis of an unconditionally stable explicit method, Computers & Structures, 16: 6 (1983) 691-696.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7949(83)90060-3

[3] R.D. Cook, D.S. Malkus, M.E. Plesha, R.J. Witt, Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, 4th Edition, Wiley, (2001).

[4] T. Belytschko, H. -J. Yen, R. Mullen, Mixed methods for time integration, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 17-18 (1979) 259-275.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(79)90022-7

[5] T.J.R. Hughes, K.S. Pister, R.L. Taylor, Implicit-explicit finite elements in nonlinear transient analysis, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 17-18 (1979) 159-182.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(79)90086-0

[6] X. Ling, H.P. Cherukuri, Stability analysis of an explicit finite element scheme for plane wave motions in elastic solids, Computational Mechanics, 29 (2002) 430-440.

DOI: 10.1007/s00466-002-0353-8

[7] J.R. Koteras, R.B. Lehoucq, Estimating the critical time step in explicit dynamics using the Lanczos method, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 69: 13 (2007) 2780-2788.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1865

[8] Z.Q. Cheng, J.G. Thacker, W.D. Pilkey, W.T. Hollowell, S.W. Reagan, E.M. Sieveka, Experiences in reverse-engineering of a finite element automobile crash model, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design, 37: 11 (2001) 843-860.

DOI: 10.1016/s0168-874x(01)00071-3

[9] G.R. Consolazio, J.H. Chung, K.R. Gurley, Impact simulation and full scale crash testing of a low profile concrete work zone barrier, Computers & Structures 81: 13 (2003) 1359-1374.

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(03)00058-0

[10] L. Kwasniewski, C. Bojanowski, J. Siervogel, J.W. Wekezer, K. Cichocki, Crash and safety assessment program for paratransit buses, International Journal of Impact Engineering 36: 2 (2009) 235-242.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2008.05.003

[11] C. -H. Liu, and K. -M. Lee, Dynamic modeling of damping effects in highly damped compliant fingers for applications involving contacts, ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, 134 (2012) 011005-1-9.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4005270

[12] K. -M. Lee, C. -H. Liu, Explicit dynamic finite element analysis of an automated grasping process using highly damped compliant fingers, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 64: 5 (2012) 965-977.

DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2012.02.033

[13] C. -H. Liu, W. Chen, W. Su, C. -N. Sun, Numerical and experimental analysis of the automated demolding process for PDMS microfluidic devices with high-aspect ratio micropillars, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 80: 1 (2015).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-015-6959-8

[14] S. Tabacu, I. Tabacu, A. Hadar, Computational modelling of vehicle interior components for impact applications: Thickness analysis, International Journal of Crashworthiness, 16: 4 (2011) 421-438.

DOI: 10.1080/13588265.2011.606994

[15] X. Deng, S. Potula, H. Grewal, K.N. Solanki, M.A. Tschopp, M.F. Horstemeyer, Finite element analysis of occupant head injuries: Parametric effects of the side curtain airbag deployment interaction with a dummy head in a side impact crash, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 55 (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.03.016

[16] N. Li, H. Fang, C. Zhang, M. Gutowski, E. Palta, Q. Wang, A numerical study of occupant responses and injuries in vehicular crashes into roadside barriers based on finite element simulations, Advances in Engineering Software, 90 (2015) 22-40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.06.004

[17] K.A. Danelson, A.J. Golman, A.R. Kemper, F.S. Gayzik, H.C. Gabler, S.M. Duma, J.D. Stitzel, Finite element comparison of human and Hybrid III responses in a frontal impact, Accident Analysis & Prevention, 85 (2015) 125-156.

DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.09.010