Utilization of Sugar Sediment Waste for a Low Cost Lightweight Concrete Development with Environmental Impact Reduction

Article Preview

Abstract:

Waste sugar sediment was included in the mix of lightweight concrete. The optimum mix that we identified was 10% by weight replacement of lime by sugar sediment. The resultant product exhibited the highest compressive strength of approximately 5.5 N/mm2, and demonstrated that a substantial proportion of the 872 million kgs of waste sugar sediment produced in Thailand per year could be diverted from landfills, providing substantial economic and environmental benefits. Our analysis indicates that about 13 million kgs of lime could be replaced by an equal amount of sugar sediment, 13 million kgs, per year, if the improved composition of lightweight autoclaved aerated concrete is adopted by the construction industry on a wide scale. As the cost of lime is about 2 Baht per kg, and sugar sediment is essentially a free input, an estimated 26,000,000 Baht per year savings is achievable. The economic, environmental and health impacts of reducing this industrial waste going into landfill areas by 13 million kgs per year must also be seen as substantial.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

369-374

Citation:

Online since:

February 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. J. Hunag, H. Y. Wang, Y. W. Wu, Properties of the mechanical in controlled low-strength rubber lightweight aggregate concrete (CLSRLC), Constr. Build. Mater. 112 (2016) 1054–1058.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.016

Google Scholar

[2] A. Wongsa, Y. Zaetang, V. Sata, P. Chindaprasirt, Properties of lightweight fly ash geopolymer concrete containing bottom ash as aggregates, Constr. Build. Mater. 111 (2016) 637–643.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.135

Google Scholar

[3] N. Dulsang, P. Kasemsiri, P. Posi, S. Hiziroglu, P. Chindaprasirt, Characterization of an environment friendly lightweight concrete containing ethyl vinyl acetate waste, Mater. Design 96 (2016) 350–356.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.037

Google Scholar

[4] H. S. Tao, Research for developing aerated concrete by using fly ash with high calcium of Gehua power plant in Hongshan, Wuhan University of Technology, WuHan, (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] O. Koronthalyova, Moisture storage capacity and microstructure of ceramic brick and autoclaved aerated concrete, Constr. Build. Mater. 25 (2011) 879–885.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.098

Google Scholar

[6] I. B. Topcu, B. Isıkdag, Effect of expanded perlite aggregate on the properties of lightweight concrete, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 204 (2008) 34-38.

Google Scholar

[7] B. G. Ma, X. Zheng, Study on a new kind of aerated concrete containing efflorescence sand-phosphorus slag–lime, J. Build. Mater. 2(3) (1999) 223–228.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Wang, J. Yin, J. C. Chen, C. Q. Peng, Aerocrete made with low silicon tailings of Cheng Chao iron ore mine, J. Wuhan Univ. Tech. Mater. Sci. Ed. 15(2) (2000) 58–62.

Google Scholar

[9] N. Y. Mostafa, Influence of air-cooled slag on physicochemical properties of autoclaved aerated concrete, Cem. Concr. Res. 35 (2005) 1349–1357.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.10.011

Google Scholar

[10] Q. K. Wang, Y. Z. Chen, F. X. Li, T. Sun, B. B. Xu, Microstructure and properties of silty siliceous crushed stone-lime aerated concrete, J. Wuhan Univ. Tech. Mater. Sci. Ed. 21(2) (2006) 17–20.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02840830

Google Scholar

[11] F. X. Li, Y. Z. Chen, S. Z. Long, Experimental investigation on aerated concrete with addition of lead–zinc tailings, J. Southwest Jiao tong Univ. 43(6) (2008) 810–815.

Google Scholar

[12] H. Kurama, I. B. Topcu, C. Karakurt, Properties of the autoclaved aerated concrete produced from coal bottom ash, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 209 (2009) 767–773.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.02.044

Google Scholar

[13] X. Y. Huang, W. Ni, W. H. Cui, Z. J. Wang, L. P. Zhu, Preparation of autoclaved aerated concrete using copper tailings and blast furnace slag, Constr. Build. Mater. 27 (2012) 1–5.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.034

Google Scholar

[14] K. Jitchaiyaphum, T. Sinsiri, C. Jaturapitakkul, P. Chindaprasirt, Cellular lightweight concrete containing high-calcium fly ash and natural zeolite, Inter. J. Min. Met. Mater. 20(5) (2013) 462–471.

DOI: 10.1007/s12613-013-0752-1

Google Scholar

[15] M. Yuttitham, S. H. Gheewala, A. Chidthaisonga, Carbon footprint of sugar produced from sugarcane in eastern Thailand, J. Clean. Prod. 19 (2011) 2119-2127.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.07.017

Google Scholar

[16] International Sugar Statistics, 2008. The International Sugar Season Runs from September to August, ED & F Man e 2007/08, Oct/Sep basis Available from: http: /www. illovosugar. com.

Google Scholar

[17] Economic and Social Department: The Statistical Division, 2011. Crop production: Food and agricultural organization of United Nations, Available from: <http: /www. faostat. fao. org>.

Google Scholar

[18] Office of Cane and Sugar Board. Report on total cane crushing and sugar production 2013/2014. Thailand: Ministry of Industry.

Google Scholar

[19] A. Thongtha, S. Maneewan, C. Punlek, Y. Ungkoon, Investigation of the compressive strength, time lags and decrement factors of AAC-lightweight concrete containing sugar sediment waste, Energ. Build. 84 (2014) 516–525.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.08.026

Google Scholar

[20] A. Thongtha, S. Maneewan, C. Punlek, Y. Ungkoon, Improving mechanical properties of autoclaved aerated concrete by sugar sediment, Adv. Mater. Res. 807-809 (2013) 1266–1269.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.807-809.1266

Google Scholar

[21] A. M. Contreras, E. Rosa, M. Pe´rez, H. V. Langenhove, J. Dewulf, Comparative life cycle assessment of four alternatives for using by-products of cane sugar production, J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009) 772-779.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.001

Google Scholar

[22] M. Goedkoop, R. Spriensma, The eco-indicator99: A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment, third ed. (Methodology Report), (2001).

Google Scholar