Low Haze and Antifog Performance of 2-Layer Poly(Lactic Acid) Based Films

Article Preview

Abstract:

For fresh-cut and ready-to-eat packaging films, antifog additives (AFs) are commonly used to suppress the formation of water droplets on film surface. To date, the type and dosage of antifogging for PLA based film are less studied. Therefore, in this research, films incorporated with antifog additive were fabricated by cast extrusion technique. The migration behavior of commercial polyglycerol ester as selected AF was investigated. The cold fog test results showed that 3.5 and 5 wt% of AF in 20PBAT/80PLA single layer film can provide clear films without droplet of water within 7 days and 3 hours, respectively. For 2-layer films, the presented of AF in seal layer as 95(20PBAT/80PLA)/5 (polyglycerol ester) and core layer of PLA were prepared having different thicknesses of seal layer/core layer of 20/15 and 10/15 μm. The migration rate of AF in thin 2-layer film (10/15 μm) appeared to be higher than that in 20/15 μm film. Films’ surface could become clear without water droplet (rating scale > 8) within 4 days for 10/15 μm and 7 days for 20/15 μm films. Haze of films was analyzed by haze meter. Haze of 10/15 μm film was decreased from 7 to 4.4, while that of 20/15 μm film was also decreased from 10 to 7.9 when AF appeared on its surface. Both films can be a peelable PLA based lidding film product with low haze (< 10 %) and antifog performance (within 1 month). In addition, 10/15 μm film can be an easy peel lidding film since its peel strength was in an easy peel range (6-10 N/15 mm).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

326-331

Citation:

Online since:

August 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Information on http: /www. crodapolymeradditives. com.

Google Scholar

[2] E. Saldivar-Guerra, E. Vivaldo-Lima, Handbook of Polymer Synthesis, Characterization, and Processing. John Wiley & Sons, (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] E. Földes, Study of the Effects Influencing Additive Migration in Polymers. Die Angewandte Makromolekulare Chemie, 261 (1998) 65-76.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-9505(19981201)261-262:1<65::aid-apmc65>3.0.co;2-s

Google Scholar

[4] A. Göldel, G. Kasaliwal, P. Pötschke, Selective Localization and Migration of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in Blends of Polycarbonate and Poly(Styrene-Acrylonitrile), Macromolecular Rapid Communications, 30 (2009), 423-29.

DOI: 10.1002/marc.200800549

Google Scholar

[5] F. Tao, B. Nysten, A. Baudouin, J.M. Thomassin, D. Vuluga, C. Detrembleur, C Bailly, Influence of Nanoparticle–Polymer Interactions on the Apparent Migration Behaviour of Carbon Nanotubes in an Immiscible Polymer Blend, Polymer, 52 (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2011.08.035

Google Scholar

[6] A.P. O'Brien, I. Cooper, and P.A. Tice, Correlation of Specific Migration (Cf) of Plastics Additives with Their Initial Concentration in the Polymer (Cp), Food Additives & Contaminants, 14 (1997), 705-19.

DOI: 10.1080/02652039709374582

Google Scholar

[7] N. van der Avort, The Method of ICI Publication 90-6E Antifog Evaluation Tests for Agricultural and Food Packaging Film,. ICI Europe Ltd., publishers White & Farrell Ltd., England, (1993).

Google Scholar

[8] R. Al-Itry, K. Lamnawar, A. Maazouz, Improvement of Thermal Stability, Rheological and Mechanical Properties of PLA, PBAT and Their Blends by Reactive Extrusion with Functionalized Epoxy, Polymer Degradation and Stability, 97 (2012), 1898-914.

DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2012.06.028

Google Scholar

[9] R. Patel, V. Ratta, P. Saavedra, J. Li, Surface Haze and Surface Morphology of Blown Film Compositions, Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting, 21 (3), (2005), 217-231.

DOI: 10.1177/8756087905057247

Google Scholar