Effect of Special Segment Aspect Ratio on Seismic Performance of Special Truss Moment Frames (STMFs)

Article Preview

Abstract:

Special Truss Moment Frame (STMF), a relatively new type of seismic force resisting system dissipates energy through plastic hinge formation in a well-defined region known as special segment. The aspect ratio of special segment plays an important role during dissipation of energy in terms of moment and rotation developed at the end of special segment. Higher aspect ratio lowers the rotational demand while lower aspect ratio increases the rotational demand at the end of special segment. ANSI/AISC 341 specifies that aspect ratio of any panel shall not exceed 1.5 nor be less than 0.67 in the special segment. This paper presents an investigation on the effect of aspect ratio of special segment during seismic event and explore the possibility of higher aspect ratio. The investigation is carried out using FEMA P695 involving nonlinear static as well as dynamic analyses based on collapse probability. In this paper the variation of aspect ratio is taken as 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5 and 3 considering 9-story comprised perimeter STMF with five bays having 150 ft. by 150 ft. in plan. For carrying out nonlinear analysis all the archetypes were modelled in a nonlinear analysis software Perform-3D. The evaluation of collapse carried out by performing incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) using scaled ground motion based on total collapse uncertainty as per FEMA P695.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

709-717

Citation:

Online since:

February 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. M. Itani, S. C. Goel, Seismic behavior of open-web truss-moment frames, J. Struct. Eng. 120 (1994) 1763–1780.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1994)120:6(1763)

Google Scholar

[2] A. M. Itani, S. C. Goel, Seismic-resistant special truss-moment frames, J. Struct. Eng. 120 (1994) 1781–1797.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1994)120:6(1781)

Google Scholar

[3] H. S. Basha, S. C. Goel, Seismic resistant moment frames with ductile vierendeel segment, Research report, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, (1994).

Google Scholar

[4] H. S. Basha, S. C. Goel, Special truss moment frames with Vierendeel middle panel, Eng. Struct. 17 (1995) 352–358.

DOI: 10.1016/0141-0296(95)00018-3

Google Scholar

[5] G. J. Parra-Montesinos, S. C. Goel, K. Y. Kim, Behavior of Steel Double-Channel Built-Up Chords of Special Truss Moment Frames under Reversed Cyclic Bending, J. Struct. Eng. 132 (2006) 1343–1351.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2006)132:9(1343)

Google Scholar

[6] S. H. Chao, S. C. Goel, Performance-based plastic design of seismic resistant special truss moment frames, Research report, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] S. Simasathien, S. H. Chao, Enhanced Seismic Performance of STMFs and STF system for seismmically active areas, Research report, University of Texas, Arlington, (2016).

Google Scholar

[8] ANSI/AISC 341-16, Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings, American Institute of steel construction, Chicago, IL, (2016).

DOI: 10.1201/b11248-16

Google Scholar

[9] FEMA P695, Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors, Federal emergency management agency, Washington, June (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] ASCE/SEI 7-10, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American society of civil engineers, Reston, Virginia, (2010).

DOI: 10.1061/9780784412916.err

Google Scholar

[11] ANSI/AISC 360-16, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of steel construction, Chicago, IL (2016).

Google Scholar

[12] PERFORM-3D, User Guide PERFORM-3D Nonlinear Analyses and Performance Assessment for 3D Structures, Computers and structures Inc., Berkely, California, (2011).

Google Scholar

[13] ASCE/SEI 41-13, Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings, American society of civil engineers, Reston, Virginia, (2013).

Google Scholar

[14] D. Vamvatsikos, C. Allin Cornell, Incremental dynamic analysis, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(2002) 491–514.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.141

Google Scholar