Release of Sodium Salicylate from Hydrogels Prepared from Wheat and Arrowroot Starches

Article Preview

Abstract:

Sodium salicylate (SS), a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, was loaded into starch-based hydrogels and the release characteristics of SS therefrom was studied. The hydrogels were prepared from wheat and arrowroot starches and crosslinked with either glutaraldehyde or sodium tetraborate decahydrate (borax). SS was loaded into hydrogel at concentrations of 10 and 20%w/w based on dry weight of sample. The study of release characteristics was carried out by total immersion method for 24 h in an acetate buffer solution (pH 5.5) at 32°C as the same condition of human skin. A burst release of SS at the initial time followed by a gradual release to reach a plateau was observed. The maximum amounts of SS released from the hydrogels were about 8-22 mg. The amount of water retention of hydrogels was also determined at the same condition with that of the study of release. The hydrogels with the greater amount of water retention showed the higher release of SS. The hydrogels crosslinked with borax had higher amounts of SS released than those crosslinked with glutaraldehyde. The hydrogels containing 20% SS-loaded showed higher amounts of SS released than those containing 10% SS-loaded. The hydrogels prepared from arrowroot starch showed higher amounts of SS released than those prepared from wheat starch. From the study of release kinetics based on the Korsmeyer-Peppas model, the exponents of release (n) of all specimens were close to 1 which indicated Case II diffusion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

124-130

Citation:

Online since:

March 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] W.L. Yan and R. Bai: Water. Res. Vol. 39 (2005), p.688.

Google Scholar

[2] Q. Jiang, W. Zhou, J. Wang, R. Tanga, D. Zhang and X. Wang: Int. J. Biol. Macromol. Vol. 91 (2016), p.85.

Google Scholar

[3] G. Marcelo, M. López-González, I. Trabado, M.M. Rodrigo, M. Valiente and F. Mendicuti: Mater. Today. Commun. Vol. 7 (2016), p.73.

DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2016.04.004

Google Scholar

[4] S. Kiatkamjornwong, K. Mongkolsawat and M. Sonsuk: Polymer. Vol. 43 (2002), p.3915.

Google Scholar

[5] J.S. Lee, R.N. Kumae, H.D. Rozman and B.M.N. Azemi: Food. Chem. Vol. 91 (2005), p.203.

Google Scholar

[6] T. Qunyi and Z. Ganwei: Carbohyd. Polym. Vol. 62 (2005), p.74.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Yoshimura, R. Yoshimura, C. Seki and R. Fujioka: Carbohyd. Polym. Vol. 64 (2006), p.345.

Google Scholar

[8] Y. Kraipinit, D. Uttapap, V. Rungsardthong and C. Puttanlek, in: Characterization of hydrogels prepared from cassava and canna starches, Proceeding of the 46th Conference of Kasetsart University (Science) (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] K.C.S. Figueiredo, T.L.M. Alves and C.P. Borges: J. Appl. Polym. Sci. Vol. 111 (2009), p.3074.

Google Scholar

[10] S. Spoljaric, A. Salminen, N.D. Luong and J. Seppala: Eur. Polym. J. Vol. 56 (2014), p.105.

Google Scholar

[11] S. Gao, J. Guo and K. Nishinari: Carbohyd. Polym. Vol. 72 (2008), p.315.

Google Scholar

[12] N. Abhari, A. Madadlou, A. Dini and O. Hosseini naveh: Food. Chem. Vol. 214 (2017), p.16.

Google Scholar

[13] C. Bai, S. Zhang, L. Huang, H. Wang, W. Wang and Q. Ye: Carbohyd. Polym. Vol. 125 (2015), p.376.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Srichuwong, T.C. Sunarti, T. Mishima, N. Isono and M. Hisamatsu: Carbohyd. Polym. Vol. 60 (2005), p.529.

Google Scholar

[15] D.G. Medcalf and K.A. Gilles, in: Wheat Starches: I. Comparison of Physiochemical Properties, The 50th annual meeting, Kansa City. North Dakota State University, Fargo, Journal Series No. 62. (1965).

Google Scholar

[16] R. Rujiravanit, S. Kruaykitanon, A.M. Jamieson and S. Tokura: Macromol. Biosci. Vol. 3 (2003), p.604.

Google Scholar

[17] N.A. Peppas and A.R. Khare: Adv. Drug. Deliver. Rev. Vol. 11 (1993), p.1.

Google Scholar