Effect of Peptizing Agent Concentration on Morphology of Unsupported Alumina Membrane

Abstract:

Ceramic membranes have received significant attention from both academia and industry, as they show the great potential in several important applications such as H₂ separation, recovery of CO₂ from natural gas and reduction of green-house gas emission from flue gas. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of peptizing agent concentration on morphology of unsupported alumina membranes that are suitable for gas separation. The unsupported alumina membranes were prepared by the sol-gel method using aluminum-tri-sec-butoxide as a precursor and acetic acid as a peptizing agent. The particle size distributions of produced boehmite sols, as measured by dynamic light scattering technique, range from 10 to 600 nm. The increase in the concentration of acetic acid results in formation of particles of smaller median diameter. The pore volume and size distribution of unsupported alumina membranes were characterized by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method of adsorption of nitrogen gas. The pore size distributions of membranes were rather narrow in the range of 3 to 6 nm. The average diameter and volume of pores increase and the surface area decreases while the concentration of acetic acid increased.

• Periodical: Key Engineering Materials (Volume 766)
• Pages: 71-76
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.766.71
• Online since: April 2018
• Authors: Nantana Thongdee*, Sukasem Watcharamaisakul, Boris Golman
• Keywords: Ceramic Membrane, Mesoporous, Peptizing Agent, Sol-Gel

References

[1] C. Xianfu, Z. Wei, L. Yuqing, C. Yuanyuan, Q. Minghui, F. Yiqun, Preparation of high-flux g-alumina nanofiltration membranes by using a modified solegel method, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. (2015) 1-9.

[2] S. Benfer, U. Popp, H. Richter, C. Siewert, G. Tomandl, Development and characterization of ceramic nanofiltration membranes, Sep. Purif. Technol. 22-23 (2001) 231–237.

DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5866(00)00133-7

[3] H. Li , U. Schygulla, J. Hoffmann, P. Niehof , K. Haas-Santo, R. Dittmeyer, Experimental and modeling study of gas transport through composite ceramic membranes, Chem. Eng. Sci. 108 (2014) 94–102.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2013.12.030

[4] W. J . Koros, Y. H. Ma, T. Shimidzu, Terminology for membranes and membrane processes, Pure Appl. Chem. 68 (1996) 1479–1489.

DOI: 10.1351/pac199668071479

[5] K. Li, Ceramic Membrane for Separation and Reaction, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, London, (2007).

[6] Y. Quan, Y. An-Xiang, L. Chen, S. Ling-Dong, Z. Ya-Wen, D. Wen-Tao, L. Hai-Chao, Y. Chun-Hua, Facile synthesis for ordered mesoporous γ-Aluminas with high thermal stability, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130 (2008) 3465-3472.

[7] M. Amanipour, A. Safekordi, E.G. Babakhani, A. Zamaniyan, M. Heidari, Effect of synthesis conditions on performance of a hydrogen selective nano-composite ceramic membrane, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 37 (2012) 15359-15366.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.07.085

[8] S.M. Grant and M. Jaroniec, Effect of acid concentration on pore size in polymer-templated mesoporous alumina, J. Mater. Chem. 22 (2012) 86.

DOI: 10.1039/c1jm13592a

[9] M. Kosmulski, Chemical properties of material surfaces, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124 (2002) 1127-1127.