Fracture Energy and Fracture Toughness of In Situ Calcium Hexaluminate (CA6)-Alumina Monolithic Refractory

Article Preview

Abstract:

One of main raw materials for monolithic refractory is calcium aluminate cement which provides CA6 hexagonal plate-like microstructure with self-toughening properties and fracture resistance. In the present study, in-situ CA6 was formed by using sintered alumina mixing with alumina cement in stoichiometric composition to achieve 100 mass% and 50 mass% of CA6 in alumina monolithic refractory with 2 mass% of silica addition. Samples were fired from 1400-1500°C for 5 h and characterized for physical and mechanical properties. The results showed that both samples could not obtain CA6 content as expected and apparent porosity did not exhibit in the same tendency. However, only proper amount of CA6 content could gain proper amount of apparent porosity which is the main effect of mechanical properties. Especially the formation of CA6 lower than 50 mass% with the presence of low melting phase caused low apparent porosity and led to high fracture toughness and effective fracture energy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

77-82

Citation:

Online since:

April 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Otroj, A. Daghighi, Microstructure and phase evolution of alumina-spinel self-flowing refractory castables containing nano-alumina particles, Ceram. Int. 37 (2011) 1003–1009.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.11.013

Google Scholar

[2] E.Y. Sako, M.A.L. Braulio, E. Zinngrebe, S.R. Laan, V.C. Pandolfelli, In-depth microstructural evolution analyses of cement-bonded spinel refractory castables: novel insights regarding spinel and CA6 Formation, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95 (2012).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05161.x

Google Scholar

[3] D. Asmi, I. Low, B. O'Connor, Physical, thermal, and mechanical Properties Of Al2O3-CaAl12O19 composites processed By in-situ reaction sintering, J. Sains Teknol. 12 (2006) 1–8.

Google Scholar

[4] D.W. Richerson, Modern ceramic engineering : properties, processing, and use in design, 3rd ed., Taylor & Francis group, New York, (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] A.G. Evans, T.G. Langdon, Structural ceramics, in: Prog. Mater. Sci., Pergamon, 1976: p.171–441.

Google Scholar

[6] R.L. Smith, J.J. Mecholsky Jr., S.W. Freiman, Estimation of fracture energy from the work of fracture and fracture surface area: I. Stable crack growth, Int. J. Fract. 156 (2009) 97–102.

DOI: 10.1007/s10704-009-9350-7

Google Scholar

[7] E.Y. Sako, M.A.L. Braulio, D.H. Milanez, P.O. Brant, V.C. Pandolfelli, Microsilica role in the CA6 formation in cement-bonded spinel refractory castables, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 (2009) 5552–5557.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.05.013

Google Scholar

[8] H. Sarpoolaky, K.G. Ahari, W.E. Lee, Influence of in situ phase formation on microstructural evolution and properties of castable refractories, Ceram. Int. 28 (2002) 487–493.

DOI: 10.1016/s0272-8842(01)00121-3

Google Scholar