On the Test Method for Determining Residual Stress on the Surface of Tempered Glass

Article Preview

Abstract:

The residual stress on the surface of tempered glass is very important for its safe service and the quality control. In this study, the sphere indentation and grazing angle surface polarimetry are compared to evaluate the surface residual stress of tempered glass. The test results showed that the measured results are similar, but the data dispersion of the sphere indentation method is little larger. The main reason is stemmed from the different tested area, of which residual stress is a mean value measured by the grazing angle polarization method. Yet for the indentation method, the residual stress in the micro region of glass is more susceptible to the inhomogeneity of material itself. However, it is difficult to select the right multiple optical path difference for the grazing angle polarization method, and it is only applicable when inspecting the tin surface of tempered glass, as well as the tin surface examination instrument. Thus, as a nondestructive testing method, indentation method can be widely used to measure the surface residual stress of glass without being influenced by other factors.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

19-23

Citation:

Online since:

April 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Park, W.R. Kim, H.T. Jeong, et al., Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 95 (2011) 184-189.

Google Scholar

[2] S. Jens, H. Jonas, A. Antti, K. Reijo, F. John. Engineering Structures, (2016).

Google Scholar

[3] W.K. Harn, Y.J. Lu. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 137.

Google Scholar

[4] Z.Y. Wang, Y.Q. Wang, Y.F. Liang, et al.. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, (2016).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Xie, J.S. Cheng, W.H. Zheng, X.C. Lou. Glass, 2003, (06): 21-23.

Google Scholar

[6] Y.W. Bao, Z.C. Chen, S.B. Su. Journal of Inorganic Materials, 2002, (04): 833-840.

Google Scholar

[7] Y.W. Bao, J.J. Yang, Y. Qiu, Y.F. Han. A glass strength assurance test method and its application in glass detection [P]. Beijing: CN1558203, 2004-12-29.

Google Scholar

[8] Evans, A.G. Fracture in Ceramics Materials, Plenum Press, New York, (1984).

Google Scholar

[9] Evans, A.G. Ceramic Containing System, NOYES PUBLICATIONS, Berkeley U.S.A., (1986).

Google Scholar

[10] Glass non-destructive on-line detection device [P]. Beijing: CN1651897, 2005-08-10.

Google Scholar

[11] K.L. Johnson, Contact Mechanics. London, UK: Cambidge University Press, (1985).

Google Scholar

[12] J.F. Li. Glass surface stress meter [P]. Beijing: CN205449356U, 2016-08-10.

Google Scholar

[13] GB / T 18144-2008, glass stress test method [S].

Google Scholar

[14] H.Y. Mu, W. Hu, F.H. Chen, et al.. Glass and Enamel, 2017, 45 (04): 6-12.

Google Scholar