Measurement of the High Temperature Elastic Modulus of Alumina Ceramics by Different Testing Methods

Article Preview

Abstract:

Alumina ceramics are widely used in the demanding high temperature applications in which the high temperature elastic moduli (EHT) is a key property for their reliability and safety. In this paper, the elastic modulus of alumina was determined by dynamic method (impulse excitation technique) and static tests (three-point bending test and four-point bending test). For the static tests, the relative method was applied to determine the accurate deflection measurement in the heating furnace. The measured results revealed that the modulus of alumina slowly decreased from RT to 1000 °C and rapidly decreased with the increasing temperatures from 1000 °C to 1300°C. The EHT evaluated by dynamic method were higher than that tested by static tests with the reason of that impulse excitation technique only applied small forces onto a sample such that defects activity is negligible. Also the resonant frequencies couldn’t be measured easily at high temperature, because the vibration signal emitted by the sample was weak. The static approaches combined with relative method were beyond the limit to high temperatures, and they can be also used to evaluate the ultra-high temperature modulus.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

24-30

Citation:

Online since:

April 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Liu, F.F. Min, J.B. Zhu, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 546 (2012) 328–331.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Pabst, E. Gregorová, M. Černý, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33 (2013) 3085-3093.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Puchegger, F. Dose F, D. Loidl, et al., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 27 (2007) 35-39.

Google Scholar

[4] W. Pabst, E. Gregorová, In: Caruta B.M. editor, New developments in materials science research, Nova Science Publishers, New York, 2007, p.77–137.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Werner, J. Fruhstorfer, A. Mertke, et al., Ceram. Int. 42 (2016) 15718-15724.

Google Scholar

[6] D. Hasselman, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 52 (1969) 600-604.

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Joliff, J. Absi, M. Huger, et al., Comput. Mater. Sci. 44 (2008) 826-831.

Google Scholar

[8] A.P. Luz, T. Santos Jr., J. Medeiros, et al., Ceram. Int. 39 (2013) 6189-6197.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Werner, C.G. Aneziris, S. Dudczig, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 96 (2013) 2958–2965.

Google Scholar

[10] B. Qi, J. Absi, N. Tessier-Doyen, Comput. Mater. Sci. 46 (2009) 996-1001.

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM C674-13, Standard Test Method for Flexural Properties of Ceramic Whiteware Materials, (2013).

Google Scholar

[12] GB/T 10700-2006, Test methods for elastic moduli of fine ceramics (advanced ceramics, advanced technical ceramics) — Bending method, (2006).

DOI: 10.3403/30325697u

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM C623-92, Standard Test Method for Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio for Glass and Glass-Ceramics by Resonance, (2015).

DOI: 10.1520/c0623

Google Scholar

[14] ASTM C1548-02, Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio of Refractory Materials by Impulse Excitation of Vibration, (2012).

DOI: 10.1520/c1548-02r07

Google Scholar

[15] ASTM C1259-15, Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio for Advanced Ceramics by Impulse Excitation of Vibration, (2015).

DOI: 10.1520/c1259-21

Google Scholar

[16] E. Nonnet, N. Lequeux, P. Boch, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 19 (1999) 1575-1583.

Google Scholar

[17] E.W. Neuman, G.E. Hilmas, W.G. Fahrenholtz, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 35 (2015) 463-476.

Google Scholar

[18] G.D. Girolamo, F.Marra, C. Blasi, et al., Ceram. Int. 40 (2014) 11433-11436.

Google Scholar

[19] Z. Liu, Y.W. Bao, D.T. Wan, et al., Ceram. Int. 41 (2015) 12835–12840.

Google Scholar

[20] ASTM E1875-13, Standard Test Method for Dynamic Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio by Sonic Resonance, (2014).

DOI: 10.1520/e1875-00e01

Google Scholar

[21] Y.W. Bao, Y.C. Zhou, X.X. Bu, et al., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 458 (2007) 268-274.

Google Scholar

[22] F.P. Beer, E.R. Johnston, J.T. Dewolf, et al., Mechanics of Materials, 6th ed., McGraw–Hill, (2012).

Google Scholar

[23] D.T. Wan, Y.W. Bao, X.G. Liu, et al., Adv. Mater. Res. 177 (2011) 114-117.

Google Scholar

[24] E.W. Neuman, G.E. Hilmas, W.G. Fahrenholtz, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33 (2013) 2889-2899.

Google Scholar

[25] J.B. Wachtman, D.G. Lam, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 42 (1959) 254–260.

Google Scholar

[26] A. Hauert, A. Rossoll, A. Mortensen, Compos. Part A 40 (2009) 524-529.

Google Scholar

[27] O. Bahr, P. Schaumann, B. Bollen, et al., Mat. Des. 45 (2013) 421-429.

Google Scholar

[28] M. Alfano, L. Pagnotta, G. Stigliano, et al., 3rd WSEAS International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Mechanics, Dec 2007, Tenerife, pp.14-16.

Google Scholar

[29] A.P. Luz, M. Huger, V.C. Pandolfelli, Ceram. Int. 37 (2011) 2335-2345.

Google Scholar