Tensile Behavior of Composite Concrete Reinforced Sugar Palm Fiber

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study aims to assess the benefit brought by fibers content, and fiber length on the splitting tensile behavior of sugar palm fibers reinforced concrete composites. Three fiber lengths of 5, 20, and 40 mm in four-fiber content, namely 1%, 2%, 3%, and 4% by a mass ratio fiber per cement, were utilized in this investigation. The values of tensile strength and density are reported for ages up to 28 days. The result observes that the addition of sugar palm fibers increased the tensile strength of concrete and the density of sugar palm fiber in concrete decreases with the addition of sugar palm fiber. The mix of 1% fiber content and 20 mm length fiber gave higher tensile strength compared to other mixes.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

471-475

Citation:

Online since:

August 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] R.H. Lumingkewas, H. Purnomo, G. Ausias, T. Lecompte, A. Perrot, D. Priadi, I. Katili, Properties of Indonesian coconut fibers for cement-based materials reinforcement, Proceeding, Third International Conference Natural Poly, Bio-Mat, and Gels, Kerala, India, (2012).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.742.92

Google Scholar

[2] Onuaguluchi O., Banthia N: Plant-based natural fiber reinforced cement composites: A review, Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 68 (2016), pp.96-108.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2016.02.014

Google Scholar

[3] Lumingkewas RH., Ausias G., Lecompte T., Perrot A., Katili I., Purnomo H., S.P. Hadiwardoyo: Effect of fibers content on the tensile properties of coconut fibers reinforced cement mortar composites, Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 742 (2013).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.742.92

Google Scholar

[4] Lumingkewas RH., A. Husen, R. Andrianus: Effect of Fibers Length and Fibers Content on the Splitting Tensile Strength of Coconut Fibers Reinforced Concrete Composites. Key Eng.Mat. Vol. 748 (2017), pp.311-315.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.748.311

Google Scholar

[5] Lumingkewas RH, Purnomo H., Ausias G., D.Priadi., Lecompte T., Perrot A: Tensile Characteristics of coconut fibers reinforced mortar composites, Advanced Materials Research, 651 (2013) 269-273.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.651.269

Google Scholar

[6] Wang W., Huang G: Characterization, and utilization of natural coconut fibers composite Material Design 30 (2009) 2741–4.

Google Scholar

[7] Asasutjarit C, Charoenvai S., Hirunlabh J, Khedari J: Materials and mechanical properties of retreated coir-based green composites, Composites: Part B, 40 (2009): 633–637.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.009

Google Scholar

[8] Bachtiar D, Sapuan SM, Zainudin ES, Khalina A, Dahlan KZM: The tensile properties of single sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) fiber. IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng Vol. 11 (2010), pp.1-6.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/11/1/012012

Google Scholar

[9] Razak HA, Ferdiansyah T: Toughness characteristics of Arenga pinnata fiber concrete, J Nat Fibers Vol. 2 (2005), p.89–103.

DOI: 10.1300/j395v02n02_06

Google Scholar

[10] Ishak MR., Sapuan SM., Leman Z., Rahman MZA., Anwar UMK.: Characterization of sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) fibers, J Therm Anal Calorim Vol. 109 (2012), p.981–989.

DOI: 10.1007/s10973-011-1785-1

Google Scholar

[11] Sahari J, Sapuan SM, Ismarrubie ZN, Rahman MZA: Physiochemical properties of different parts of sugar palm fiber. Fibers Text East Eur Vol. 20 (2012), p.23–6.

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM C496. Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens, Annual Book of ASTM Standards: American Society of Testing Materials; (2004).

Google Scholar

[13] M.L. Sanyang, S.M. Sapuan, M. Jawaid, M.R. Ishak, J. Sahari: Recent developments in sugar palm (Arenga pinnata) based biocomposites and their potential industrial applications: A review, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews Vol. 54 (2016).

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.037

Google Scholar