Paper Titles

Mechanical Properties and Thermal Conductivity of Lightweight Clay Bricks Fabricated with a Powdered Marble Dust Additive
p.465

Tensile Behavior of Composite Concrete Reinforced Sugar Palm Fiber
p.471

Minimally Invasive Detection Technologies for the Defects in Ancient Timber Structural Building
p.476

Influence of Replacement Rate of Fine Aggregate by Blast Furnace Slag Sand on Fresh Properties of Mortar
p.483

An Effect on Properties of Hybrid Fibres Bio-Composite: Sustainable on Rural Building Materials
p.491

Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Wood-Plastic Composites
p.499

Effect of Alkaline Activators to Engineering Properties of Geopolymer-Based Materials Synthesized from Red Mud
p.508

Evaluation on Roles of Activated Silicon and Aluminum Oxides for Formation of Geopolymer from Red Mud and Silica Fume
p.513

Leaching Behavior and Immobilization of Heavy Metals in Geopolymer Synthesized from Red Mud and Fly Ash
p.518

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 777An Effect on Properties of Hybrid Fibres...

An Effect on Properties of Hybrid Fibres Bio-Composite: Sustainable on Rural Building Materials

Article Preview

Abstract:

These are developed to the Eco-composite structure for using of the rural building materials. The chemical and physical properties were carried associated with Ratchaburi lateritic red soil and cellulose fibers for product development. Also mechanical testing, thermal conductivity, leachability, environmental toxic and Finite element analysis (FEA) were conducted for product evaluation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Green Building Materials

Advanced Materials and Engineering Materials VII

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 777)

Pages:

491-498

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.777.491

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2018

Authors:

Weerapol Namboonruang*

Keywords:

Eco Soil Cement Composite Block, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Leachability Property, Pineapple Cellulose Fibres, Sugarcane Cellulose Fibres

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Libo Yan, Bohumil Kasal, Liang Huang. A review of recent research on the use of cellulosic fibres, their fibre fabric reinforced cementitious, geo-polymer and polymer composites in civil engineering. Composites Part B, 92 (2016) 94-132.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.02.002

[2] Cook DJ, Pama RP, Weerasingle HL. Coir fibre reinforced cement as a low cost roofing material. Build Environ 1978;13(3):193-8.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-1323(78)90043-4

[3] Aziz MA, Paramasivam P, Lee SL. Concrete reinforced with natural fibres. New Reinf Concr 1984;1:106-40.

[4] Ghavami K, Toledo Filho RD, Barbosa NP. Behavior of composite soil reinforced with natural fibres. Cem Concr Compos 1999;21(1):39-48.

DOI: 10.1016/s0958-9465(98)00033-x

[5] Silva FA, Toledo Filho RD, Fairbairn EMR. Physical and mechanical properties of durable sisal fiber-cement composites. Constr Build Mater 2010;24(5):777-85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.030

[6] Reis J. Fracture and flexural characterization of natural fibre-reinforced polymer concrete. Constr Build Mater 2006;20(9):673-8.

[7] Zhu HX, Yan LB, Zhang R, Qiu XM. Size-dependent and tunable elastic properties of hierarchical honeycombs with regular square and equilateral triangular cells. Acta Mater 2012;60(12):4927-39.

DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.05.009

[8] Yan L, Chouw N. Behavior and analytical modeling of natural flax fibre reinforced polymer tube confined plain concrete and coir fibre reinforced concrete. J Compos Mater 2013;47(17): 2133-48.

DOI: 10.1177/0021998312454691

[9] Piattoni Q, Quagliarini Q, Lenci S. Experimental analysis and modelling of the mechanical behaviour of earthen bricks. Const Build Mater 2011;25: 2067–75.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.11.039

[10] Delgado MCJ, Guerrero IC. Earth building in Spain. Const Build Mater 2006;20:679–90.

[11] Morel J, Pkla A, Walker P. Compressive strength testing of compressed earth blocks. Const Build Mater 2007;21:303–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.021

[12] Silveira D, Varum H, Costa A, Martins T, Pereira H, Almeida J. Mechanical properties of adobe bricks in ancient constructions. Const Build Mater 2012;28:36–44.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.046

[13] Sofia A. Lima, Humberto Varum, Almir Sales, Victor F. Neto. Analysis of the mechanical properties of compressed earth block masonry using the sugarcane bagasse ash. Construction and Building Materials 35 (2012) 829–837.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.127

[14] ASTM, Standard C90, Standard Specification for Load bearing Concrete Masonry Units, in, American Standard Testing and Materials (ASTM), West Conshohocken, PA,USA, (1996).

[15] Specification for interlocking block (non- bearing load type).TCPS:602-2547,2004, Bureau of Thai Industrial Standard, Bangkok.

[16] USEPA, Toxicity characteristics leaching procedure (TCLP), Method 1311, Cincinnati, (1982).

[17] Standard for Structural clay load - bearing tile. TIS-102-2517,1974, Bureau of Thai Industrial Standard, Bangkok.

[18] ASTM D4318-17, Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2017).

[19] ASTM D422-63(2007)e2, Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2007).

[20] ASTM C150 / C150M-17, Standard Specification for Portland Cement, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, (2017).