Numerical and Experimental Study of Quenching and Tempering Process of AISI 4130 Steel for Rocket Components

Article Preview

Abstract:

In manufacturing process of rocket components, quenching and tempering process can be used to achieve suitable hardness, ultimate tensile strength and yield strength of raw material. The trial and error of quenching and tempering process to succeed suitable properties of raw material will waste of budget and time. In this study, numerical analysis of quenching and tempering process on AISI 4130 steel was investigated comparative to actual heat treatment process to evaluate the agreement between them. The numerical analysis technique was used to seek suitable tempering temperature with specify quenching temperature at 870°C and soaking time for an hour. The result showed that suitable tempering temperature was 450°C to achieve as-required mechanical properties. The actual quenching and tempering process was performed by furnace heating to 860°C and soaking for 60 minutes, followed by 450°C tempering for 2 hours. The results will be comparatively concluded that they slightly differed from numerical analysis around 5%-12% and showed a good agreement between numerical analysis and experimental result.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

16-22

Citation:

Online since:

December 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Metal Hand Book, Vol. 4, 8th Edition, ASM, Metals Park, OH, USA, 1969, pp.201-208.

Google Scholar

[2] W. F. Brown Jr., H. Mindlin and C.Y. Ho: Aerospace Structure Metals Handbook, CINDAS/USAF CRDA Hand books Operation, Purdue University, 1997, p.1.

Google Scholar

[3] W. D. Callister Jr.: Materials Science and Engineering, 4th Edition, Department of Metallurgical Engineering, The University of Utah.

Google Scholar

[4] E. S. Jones: Rocket materials - a challenge for metallurgists, J. Met. 12 (6) (1960), pp.448-454.

Google Scholar

[5] Structural Alloys Hand Book, 1978, 1, Battle's Columbus Division, 505 King Avenue, Columbus, Ohio.

Google Scholar

[6] Metal Hand Book, 1978, Properties and Selection, Iron & Steel, 1, 9th Edition, ASM, pp.504-522.

Google Scholar

[7] K. W. Andrews: Empirical formulas for the calculation of some transformation temperatures,, JISI, vol. 203(1965), p.721.

Google Scholar

[8] J. S. Kirkaldy and D. Venugopalan: Prediction of microstructure and hardenability in low-alloy steels,, The metalurgical Society/AIME, pp.125-148, (1984).

Google Scholar

[9] W. Steven and A. G. Haynes: The temperature of formation of martensite and bainite in low-alloy steels. Some effects of chemical composition,, JISI, vol. 183(1956), p.349.

Google Scholar

[10] W. A. Johnson and R. F. Mehl: Reaction kinetics in processes of nucleation and growth,, trans. AIMME, vol. 135(1939), p.416.

Google Scholar

[11] D. P. Koistinen and R. E. Marburger: A general equation prescribing the extent of austenite-martensite transformation in pure iron-carbon alloys and plain carbon steels, acta metall., vol. 7(1959), pp.59-60.

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6160(59)90170-1

Google Scholar

[12] J. H. Houomon and L. D. Jaffe: Trans. AIME, vol. 162(1945), pp.223-249.

Google Scholar

[13] E. J. Pavlina, C.J. Van Tyne, Correlation of yield strength and tensile strength with hardness for steels,, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, vol. 17(6)( December 2008), pp.888-893.

DOI: 10.1007/s11665-008-9225-5

Google Scholar

[14] Fundamentals of Modern Manufacturing: Materials, Processes, and Systems, 4th Edition, 2010, USA.

Google Scholar