A Damage Mechanics Based Cohesive Zone Model with Damage Gradient Extension for Creep-Fatigue-Interaction

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper a novel Cohesive Zone Model (CZM) is derived within the framework of continuum thermodynamics to describe cracking and delamination behaviour of coatings at high-temperatures. The separation variable in the Traction-Separation-Law (TSL) is decomposed into elastic and inelastic part. For evolution of inelastic separation, a power-law in combination with a damage evolution law is used to consider the tertiary stage of inelastic separation of the interface, additionally. Thereby, damage evolution is related to the corresponding thermodynamic driving force and the inelastic opening rate. For reasons of simplicity the resulting thermo-mechanical problem only considers heat conduction through the interface. Due to the fact that standard Newton-Raphson procedure gets unstable (e.g. snap-back) when softening occurs which is the case by using a CZM, this model is enhanced with the damage gradient, similar to approaches in phase field modelling. Further on, this extension is done to investigate if it is possible to overcome the size dependence of CZMs. Finally, the model is reduced to pure Mode I opening and an example for a Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) is analysed by the finite difference method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

253-259

Citation:

Online since:

February 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G. Barenblatt, The formation of equilibrium cracks during brittle fracture. General ideas and hypotheses. Axially-symmetric cracks, ZAMM 23 (1959) 622–636.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1

Google Scholar

[2] D. Dugdale, Yielding of steel sheets containing slits, J. Mech. Phy. Solid. 8 (1960) 100–104.

Google Scholar

[3] A. Needleman, An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface, in: Non-Linear Fracture, Springer Netherlands, 1990, p.21–40.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2444-9_2

Google Scholar

[4] V. Tvergaard, J. W. Hutchinson, The relation between crack growth resistance and fracture process parameters in elastic-plastic solids, J. Mech. Phy. Solid. 40 (1992) 1377–1397.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-5096(92)90020-3

Google Scholar

[5] J. Bouvard, J. Chaboche, F. Feyel, F. Gallerneau, A cohesive zone model for fatigue and creep-fatigue crack growth in single crystal superalloys, Int. J. Fatigue 31 (2009) 868–879.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.002

Google Scholar

[6] M. Musto, G. Alfano, A novel rate-dependent cohesive-zone model combining damage and visco-elasticity, Comput. Struct. 118 (2013) 126–133.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2012.12.020

Google Scholar

[7] S. H. Song, G. H. Paulino, W. G. Buttlar, A bilinear cohesive zone model tailored for fracture of asphalt concrete considering viscoelastic bulk material, Eng. Fract. Mech. 73 (2006) 2829–2848.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2006.04.030

Google Scholar

[8] Y. F. Gao, A. F. Bower, A simple technique for avoiding convergence problems in finite element simulations of crack nucleation and growth on cohesive interfaces, Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. 12 (2004) 453–463.

DOI: 10.1088/0965-0393/12/3/007

Google Scholar

[9] R. de Borst, L. Sluys, H.-B. Mühlhaus, J. Pamin, Fundamental Issues in Finite Element Analyses of Localization of Deformation, Eng. Computation. 10 (1993) 99–121.

DOI: 10.1108/eb023897

Google Scholar

[10] A. Needleman, Some Issues in Cohesive Surface Modeling, Procedia IUTAM 10 (2014) 221–246.

DOI: 10.1016/j.piutam.2014.01.020

Google Scholar

[11] J. Nordmann, P. Thiem, N. Cinca, K. Naumenko, M. Krüger, Analysis of iron aluminide coated beams under creep conditions in high-temperature four-point bending tests, J. Strain Anal. Eng. 53 (2018) 255–265.

DOI: 10.1177/0309324718761305

Google Scholar

[12] K. Naumenko, H. Altenbach, Modeling High Temperature Materials Behavior for Structural Analysis, Springer International Publishing, (2016).

Google Scholar

[13] M. Fagerström, R. Larsson, A thermo-mechanical cohesive zone formulation for ductile fracture, J. Mech. Phy. Solid. 56 (2008) 3037–3058.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmps.2008.06.002

Google Scholar

[14] C. Miehe, F.Welschinger, M. Hofacker, Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field FE implementations, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 83 (2010) 1273–1311.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.2861

Google Scholar

[15] Y. Mi, M. A. Crisfield, G. A. O. Davies, H. B. Hellweg, Progressive Delamination Using Interface Elements, J. Compo. Mater. 32 (1998) 1246–1272.

DOI: 10.1177/002199839803201401

Google Scholar