Removal of Copper (II) Ion: Effect of Polysulfone Support Thickness

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study was conducted to characterize the industrial wastewater containing Copper (II) ion and to evaluate the effect of different thickness of polysulfone as the support membrane in the fabrication of thin film composite membrane (TFC), on the removal of Copper (II) ion. From the wastewater analysis, it showed that the concentration of copper (II) ion are out of the acceptable range of Environmental Quality (Industrial Effluent) Regulations 2009. For the TFC, the polysulfone support membrane was prepared at two thicknesses, 60μm and 90μm. For each thickness, two formulations of thin layer were coated on it; i) A polymer blend of Polyvinyl Alcohol and Chitosan, and ii) Hybrid membrane as thin layer. Before undergo the treatment process, the pH of the wastewater sample was altered to 7 as the pre-treatment. The final result shows that composite membrane with hybrid membrane as thin layer with 90μm thickness of polysulfone membrane was the best membrane because it could remove 99.67% of copper (II) ion. Finally, the treated water can be discharged to the groundwater because the concentration of copper ion is less than 1 ppm, which it has fulfilled the Environmental Quality regulations. Keywords— Chitosan, Copper ion, composite membrane, hybrid membrane, industrial wastewater

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

29-38

Citation:

Online since:

March 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.A. Barakat, New trends in removing heavy metals from industrial wastewater, Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 4 (2011) 361-377.

DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2010.07.019

Google Scholar

[2] R. Singh, Hybrid membrane systems—applications and case studies. Hybrid Membrane Systems for Water Purification, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-185617442-8/50004-x

Google Scholar

[3] A.K. Shrivastava, A review on copper pollution and its removal from water bodies by pollution control technologies, Indian Journal of Environmental Protection. 29 (2009) 552-560.

Google Scholar

[4] Environmental Requirements Department of Environment, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment (2010).

Google Scholar

[5] F. Fu, Q. Wang, Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewaters: A review, Journal of Environmental Management. 92 (2011) 407-418.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.011

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Huang, J. R. Du, Y. Zhang, D. Lawless, X. Feng, Removal of mercury (II) from wastewater by polyvinylamine-enhanced ultrafiltration, Sep. Purif. Technol. 154 (2015) 1–10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.09.003

Google Scholar

[7] C.Y. Wu, H. Mouri, S.S. Chen, D. Z. Zhang, M. Koga, J. Kobayashi, Removal of trace-amount mercury from wastewater by forward osmosis, Journal of Water Process Engineering, 14 (2016) 108-116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.10.010

Google Scholar

[8] H. Ramadan, A. Ghanem, A., H. El-Rassy, Mercury removal from aqueous solutions using silica, polyacrylamide and hybrid silica-polyacrylamide aerogels, Chem. Eng. J. 159 (2010) 107-115.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2010.02.051

Google Scholar

[9] M. Arbabi, N. Golshani, Removal of copper ions Cu (II) from industrial wastewater, International Journal of Epidemiologic Research. 3 (2016) 283-293.

Google Scholar

[10] A.L. Ahmad, S.Y. Olatunji, Z. A. Jawad, Thickness Effect on the Morphology and Permeability of CO2/N2 Gases in Asymmetric Polyetherimide Membrane, J. Phys. Sci. 28 (2017) 201–213.

DOI: 10.21315/jps2017.28.s1.13

Google Scholar

[11] ASTM D888 ASTM D888. Standard Test Method for Dissolved Oxygen in Water.

Google Scholar

[12] ASTM D1252-9. standard test methods for chemical oxygen demand (dichromate oxygen demand) of water.

DOI: 10.1520/d1252-06r20

Google Scholar

[13] ASTM D5907-13. Standard Test Methods for Filterable Matter (Total Dissolved Solids) and Nonfilterable Matter (Total Suspended Solids) in Water.

DOI: 10.1520/d5907-96a

Google Scholar

[14] N.A. Sulaiman, N. Z. K. Shaari, N.A. Rahman, Removal of Cu (II) and Fe (II) Ions Through Thin Film Composite (TFC) With Hybrid Membrane, J. Eng. Sci. Tech. (2016) 36-49.

Google Scholar

[15] M.A. Zulfikar, A. W. Mohammad, A. A. Kadhum, N. Hilal, Synthesis and characterization of poly(methyl methacrylate)/SiO2 hybrid membrane, Mater. Sci. Eng., A. 452-453 (2007) 422-426.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2006.10.147

Google Scholar

[16] F. Shi, Y. Ma, J. Ma, P. Wang, W. Sun, Preparation and characterization of PVDF / TiO2 hybrid membranes with different dosage of nano-TiO2, J. Memb. Sci. 389 (2012) 522–531.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.11.022

Google Scholar

[17] C. K. Yeom, K. H. Lee, A study on desorption resistance in pervaporation of single component through dense membranes, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 63 (1997) 221–232.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4628(19970110)63:2<221::aid-app9>3.0.co;2-x

Google Scholar

[18] C. Ding, J. Yin, B. Deng, Effects of Polysulfone (PSf) Support Layer on the Performance of Thin-Film Composite (TFC) Membranes, J Chem Proc Eng. 1 (2014) 1-8.

DOI: 10.17303/jce.2014.102

Google Scholar

[19] Z. Xie, Hybrid Organic-Inorganic Pervaporation Membranes for Desalination, thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, (2012).

Google Scholar

[20] A. Raisi, A. Aroujalian, Aroma compound recovery by hydrophobic pervaporation: the effect of membrane thickness and coupling phenomena, Sep. Purif. Technol. 82 (2011) 53–62.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.08.018

Google Scholar